IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2504.11258.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Liam Welsh
  • Udit Grover
  • Sebastian Jaimungal

Abstract

Climate change is a major threat to the future of humanity, and its impacts are being intensified by excess man-made greenhouse gas emissions. One method governments can employ to control these emissions is to provide firms with emission limits and penalize any excess emissions above the limit. Excess emissions may also be offset by firms who choose to invest in carbon reducing and capturing projects. These projects generate offset credits which can be submitted to a regulating agency to offset a firm's excess emissions, or they can be traded with other firms. In this work, we characterize the finite-agent Nash equilibrium for offset credit markets. As computing Nash equilibria is an NP-hard problem, we utilize the modern reinforcement learning technique Nash-DQN to efficiently estimate the market's Nash equilibria. We demonstrate not only the validity of employing reinforcement learning methods applied to climate themed financial markets, but also the significant financial savings emitting firms may achieve when abiding by the Nash equilibria through numerical experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Liam Welsh & Udit Grover & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2025. "Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit Markets," Papers 2504.11258, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.11258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.11258
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seifert, Jan & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese & Wagner, Michael, 2008. "Dynamic behavior of CO2 spot prices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 180-194, September.
    2. Hitzemann, Steffen & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese, 2018. "Equilibrium Price Dynamics of Emission Permits," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 1653-1678, August.
    3. Steven Campbell & Yichao Chen & Arvind Shrivats & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2021. "Deep Learning for Principal-Agent Mean Field Games," Papers 2110.01127, arXiv.org.
    4. Eirik Amundsen & Fridrik Baldursson & Jørgen Mortensen, 2006. "Price Volatility and Banking in Green Certificate Markets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 35(4), pages 259-287, December.
    5. René Carmona & Gökçe Dayanıklı & Mathieu Laurière, 2022. "Mean Field Models to Regulate Carbon Emissions in Electricity Production," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 897-928, September.
    6. Arvind Shrivats & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2020. "Optimal Generation and Trading in Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) Markets," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1-2), pages 99-131, July.
    7. Tiziano De Angelis & Peter Tankov & Olivier David Zerbib, 2023. "Climate Impact Investing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7669-7692, December.
    8. René Aïd & Sara Biagini, 2023. "Optimal dynamic regulation of carbon emissions market," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 80-115, January.
    9. Joseph E. Aldy & Zachery M. Halem, 2024. "The Evolving Role of Greenhouse Gas Emission Offsets in Combating Climate Change," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(2), pages 212-233.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Welsh, Liam & Jaimungal, Sebastian, 2024. "Nash equilibria in greenhouse gas offset credit markets," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    2. Dena Firoozi & Arvind V Shrivats & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2021. "Principal agent mean field games in REC markets," Papers 2112.11963, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    3. Liam Welsh & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2024. "Nash Equilibria in Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit Markets," Papers 2401.01427, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    4. St'ephane Cr'epey & Mekonnen Tadese & Gauthier Vermandel, 2024. "Sensitivity Analysis of emissions Markets: A Discrete-Time Radner Equilibrium Approach," Papers 2411.06185, arXiv.org.
    5. Arvind Shrivats & Dena Firoozi & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2020. "A Mean-Field Game Approach to Equilibrium Pricing in Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Markets," Papers 2003.04938, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    6. Arvind V. Shrivats & Dena Firoozi & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2022. "A mean‐field game approach to equilibrium pricing in solar renewable energy certificate markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 779-824, July.
    7. Arvind Shrivats & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2019. "Optimal Behaviour in Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) Markets," Papers 1904.06337, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    8. Estelle Cantillon & Aurélie Slechten, 2018. "Information Aggregation in Emissions Markets with Abatement," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 132, pages 53-79.
    9. Coulon, Michael & Khazaei, Javad & Powell, Warren B., 2015. "SMART-SREC: A stochastic model of the New Jersey solar renewable energy certificate market," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 13-31.
    10. Jeitschko, Thomas D. & Kim, Soo Jin & Pal, Pallavi, 2024. "Curbing price fluctuations in cap-and-trade auctions under changing demand expectations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Huang, Zhehao & Dong, Hao & Jia, Shuaishuai, 2022. "Equilibrium pricing for carbon emission in response to the target of carbon emission peaking," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Steven Campbell & Yichao Chen & Arvind Shrivats & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2021. "Deep Learning for Principal-Agent Mean Field Games," Papers 2110.01127, arXiv.org.
    13. Wegener, Christoph & Kruse-Becher, Robinson & Klein, Tony, 2024. "EU ETS Market Expectations and Rational Bubbles," VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges 302359, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    14. Pahle, Michael & Quemin, Simon & Osorio, Sebastian & Günther, Claudia & Pietzcker, Robert, 2025. "The emerging endgame: The EU ETS on the road towards climate neutrality," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Hui, Wang & Xin-gang, Zhao & Ling-zhi, Ren & Fan, Lu, 2021. "An agent-based modeling approach for analyzing the influence of market participants’ strategic behavior on green certificate trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    16. Steffen Hitzemann & Marliese Uhrig-Homburg, 2019. "Empirical performance of reduced-form models for emission permit prices," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 389-418, October.
    17. Gianmarco Del Sarto & Marta Leocata & Giulia Livieri, 2024. "A Mean Field Game approach for pollution regulation of competitive firms," Papers 2407.12754, arXiv.org.
    18. Dubois, Loick & Sahuc, Jean-Guillaume & Vermandel, Gauthier, 2025. "A general equilibrium approach to carbon permit banking," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    19. Grüll, Georg & Taschini, Luca, 2011. "Cap-and-trade properties under different hybrid scheme designs," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 107-118, January.
    20. Fang, Sheng & Lu, Xinsheng & Li, Jianfeng & Qu, Ling, 2018. "Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis of carbon emission allowance and stock returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 551-566.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.11258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.