Doubly weighted M-estimation for nonrandom assignment and missing outcomes
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Komunjer, Ivana, 2005.
"Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation for conditional quantiles,"
Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 137-164, September.
- Komunjer, Ivana, 2002. "Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Conditional Quantiles," Working Papers 1139, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
- V. Joseph Hotz & Guido W. Imbens & Jacob A. Klerman, 2006.
"Evaluating the Differential Effects of Alternative Welfare-to-Work Training Components: A Reanalysis of the California GAIN Program,"
Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(3), pages 521-566, July.
- V. Joseph Hotz & Guido W. Imbens & Jacob A. Klerman, 2006. "Evaluating the Differential Effects of Alternative Welfare-to-Work Training Components: A Re-Analysis of the California GAIN Program," NBER Working Papers 11939, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Sergio Firpo, 2007.
"Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 259-276, January.
- Sergio Firpo, 2004. "Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 605, Econometric Society.
- Thomas J. Kane & Douglas O. Staiger, 2008. "Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation," NBER Working Papers 14607, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Sebastian Calónico & Jeffrey Smith, 2017. "The Women of the National Supported Work Demonstration," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(S1), pages 65-97.
- Markus Frölich & Martin Huber, 2014.
"Treatment Evaluation With Multiple Outcome Periods Under Endogeneity and Attrition,"
Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(508), pages 1697-1711, December.
- Frölich, Markus & Huber, Martin, 2014. "Treatment Evaluation with Multiple Outcome Periods under Endogeneity and Attrition," IZA Discussion Papers 7972, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Frölich, Markus & Huber, Martin, 2014. "Treatment evaluation with multiple outcome periods under endogeneity and attrition," Economics Working Paper Series 1404, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
- Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2007.
"Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems,"
Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 1281-1301, December.
- Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2004. "Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems," CeMMAP working papers CWP05/04, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2004. "Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems," CeMMAP working papers 05/04, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Martin Huber & Blaise Melly, 2015. "A Test of the Conditional Independence Assumption in Sample Selection Models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(7), pages 1144-1168, November.
- Raj Chetty & John N. Friedman & Jonah E. Rockoff, 2014.
"Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(9), pages 2593-2632, September.
- Raj Chetty & John N. Friedman & Jonah E. Rockoff, 2013. "Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates," NBER Working Papers 19423, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Chetty, Nadarajan & Friedman, John & Rockoff, Jonah E., 2014. "Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates," Scholarly Articles 30749073, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- James Heckman & Hidehiko Ichimura & Jeffrey Smith & Petra Todd, 1998.
"Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(5), pages 1017-1098, September.
- James Heckman & Hidehiko Ichimura & Jeffrey Smith & Petra Todd, 1998. "Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data," NBER Working Papers 6699, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Joshua Angrist & Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández-Val, 2006.
"Quantile Regression under Misspecification, with an Application to the U.S. Wage Structure,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 539-563, March.
- Joshua Angrist & Victor Chernozhukov & Ivan Fernandez-Val, 2004. "Quantile Regression under Misspecification, with an Application to the U.S. Wage Structure," NBER Working Papers 10428, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Shadish, William R. & Clark, M. H. & Steiner, Peter M., 2008. "Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random and Nonrandom Assignments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(484), pages 1334-1344.
- Sergio Firpo & Nicole M. Fortin & Thomas Lemieux, 2009.
"Unconditional Quantile Regressions,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 953-973, May.
- SErgio Firpo & Nicole M. Fortin & Thomas Lemieux, 2006. "Unconditional Quantile Regressions," Textos para discussão 533, Department of Economics PUC-Rio (Brazil).
- Sergio Firpo & Nicole M. Fortin & Thomas Lemieux, 2007. "Unconditional Quantile Regressions," NBER Technical Working Papers 0339, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Jinyong Hahn, 1998. "On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 315-332, March.
- LaLonde, Robert J, 1986.
"Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 604-620, September.
- Robert J. LaLonde, 1984. "Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data," Working Papers 563, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
- Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2009.
"GMM redundancy results for general missing data problems,"
Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 47-55, July.
- Artem Prokhorov & Peter Schmidt, 2008. "GMM Redundancy Results for General Missing Data Problems," Working Papers 08003, Concordia University, Department of Economics.
- Heckman, J.J. & Hotz, V.J., 1988.
"Choosing Among Alternative Nonexperimental Methods For Estimating The Impact Of Social Programs: The Case Of Manpower Training,"
University of Chicago - Economics Research Center
88-12, Chicago - Economics Research Center.
- James J. Heckman, 1989. "Choosing Among Alternative Nonexperimental Methods for Estimating the Impact of Social Programs: The Case of Manpower Training," NBER Working Papers 2861, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Martin Huber, 2014.
"Treatment Evaluation in the Presence of Sample Selection,"
Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(8), pages 869-905, November.
- Martin Huber, 2009. "Treatment evaluation in the presence of sample selection," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2009 2009-07, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
- White, Halbert, 1983.
"Corrigendum [Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models],"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(2), pages 513-513, March.
- White, Halbert, 1982. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-25, January.
- Sergio Firpo & Cristine Pinto, 2016.
"Identification and Estimation of Distributional Impacts of Interventions Using Changes in Inequality Measures,"
Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 457-486, April.
- Firpo, Sergio, 2010. "Identification and Estimation of Distributional Impacts of Interventions Using Changes in Inequality Measures," IZA Discussion Papers 4841, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Rahul Singh, 2021. "Generalized Kernel Ridge Regression for Causal Inference with Missing-at-Random Sample Selection," Papers 2111.05277, arXiv.org.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2009.
"Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation,"
Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 5-86, March.
- Guido Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2008. "Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation," CeMMAP working papers CWP24/08, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. & Imbens, Guido, 2009. "Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," Scholarly Articles 3043416, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Guido M. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2008. "Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," NBER Working Papers 14251, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Imbens, Guido W. & Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2008. "Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," IZA Discussion Papers 3640, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Flores, Carlos A. & Mitnik, Oscar A., 2009.
"Evaluating Nonexperimental Estimators for Multiple Treatments: Evidence from Experimental Data,"
IZA Discussion Papers
4451, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Carlos A. Flores & Oscar A. Mitnik, 2009. "Evaluating Nonexperimental Estimators for Multiple Treatments: Evidence from Experimental Data," Working Papers 2010-10, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
- Carlos A. Flores & Oscar A. Mitnik, 2009. "Evaluating Nonexperimental Estimators for Multiple Treatments: Evidence from Experimental Data," Working Papers 2010-9, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
- Donald, Stephen G. & Hsu, Yu-Chin, 2014.
"Estimation and inference for distribution functions and quantile functions in treatment effect models,"
Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P3), pages 383-397.
- Stephen G. Donald & Yu-Chin Hsu, 2012. "Estimation and Inference for Distribution Functions and Quantile Functions in Treatment Effect Models," IEAS Working Paper : academic research 12-A016, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Zhao, Jun, 2020.
"Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators,"
Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 101-122.
- Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna & Jun B. Zhao, 2018. "Doubly Robust Difference-in-Differences Estimators," Papers 1812.01723, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
- Ozkan Eren & Serkan Ozbeklik, 2014. "Who Benefits From Job Corps? A Distributional Analysis Of An Active Labor Market Program," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 586-611, June.
- Alejo, Javier & Galvao, Antonio F. & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel, 2018. "Quantile continuous treatment effects," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 13-36.
- Rothstein, Jesse & Von Wachter, Till, 2016.
"Social Experiments in the Labor Market,"
Department of Economics, Working Paper Series
qt7957p9g6, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Rothstein, Jesse & von Wachter, Till, 2016. "Social Experiments in the Labor Market," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt6605k20b, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Rothstein, Jesse & von Wachter, Till, 2016. "Social Experiments in the Labor Market," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt6605k20b, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
- Jesse Rothstein & Till von Wachter, 2016. "Social Experiments in the Labor Market," NBER Working Papers 22585, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Sergio Firpo & Cristine Pinto, 2016.
"Identification and Estimation of Distributional Impacts of Interventions Using Changes in Inequality Measures,"
Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 457-486, April.
- Firpo, Sergio, 2010. "Identification and Estimation of Distributional Impacts of Interventions Using Changes in Inequality Measures," IZA Discussion Papers 4841, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Vivian C. Wong & Peter M. Steiner & Kylie L. Anglin, 2018. "What Can Be Learned From Empirical Evaluations of Nonexperimental Methods?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(2), pages 147-175, April.
- Dettmann, E. & Becker, C. & Schmeißer, C., 2011. "Distance functions for matching in small samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 1942-1960, May.
- Denis Conniffe & Vanessa Gash & Philip J. O'Connell, 2000. "Evaluating State Programmes - “Natural Experiments” and Propensity Scores," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 31(4), pages 283-308.
- A. Smith, Jeffrey & E. Todd, Petra, 2005.
"Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?,"
Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1-2), pages 305-353.
- Jeffrey Smith & Petra Todd, 2003. "Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?," University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP) Working Papers 20035, University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP).
- Dettmann, Eva & Becker, Claudia & Schmeißer, Christian, 2010. "Is there a Superior Distance Function for Matching in Small Samples?," IWH Discussion Papers 3/2010, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
- Dehejia Rajeev, 2015. "Experimental and Non-Experimental Methods in Development Economics: A Porous Dialectic," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 47-69, June.
- James Heckman & Salvador Navarro-Lozano, 2004.
"Using Matching, Instrumental Variables, and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(1), pages 30-57, February.
- Heckman, James J. & Navarro, Salvador, 2003. "Using Matching, Instrumental Variables and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models," IZA Discussion Papers 768, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Heckman, James & Navarro-Lozano, Salvador, 2003. "Using matching, instrumental variables and control functions to estimate economic choice models," Working Paper Series 2003:4, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
- James J. Heckman & Salvador Navarro-Lozano, 2003. "Using Matching, Instrumental Variables and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models," NBER Working Papers 9497, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Difang Huang & Jiti Gao & Tatsushi Oka, 2025.
"Semiparametric single-index estimation for average treatment effects,"
Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 843-885, July.
- Difang Huang & Jiti Gao & Tatsushi Oka, 2022. "Semiparametric Single-Index Estimation for Average Treatment Effects," Papers 2206.08503, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
- Difang Huang & Jiti Gao & Tatsushi Oka, 2022. "Semiparametric Single-Index Estimation for Average Treatment Effects," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 10/22, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
- Arun Advani & Toru Kitagawa & Tymon Słoczyński, 2019.
"Mostly harmless simulations? Using Monte Carlo studies for estimator selection,"
Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 893-910, September.
- Arun Advani & Toru Kitagawa & Tymon S{l}oczy'nski, 2018. "Mostly Harmless Simulations? Using Monte Carlo Studies for Estimator Selection," Papers 1809.09527, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
- Advani, Arun & Kitagawa, Toru & Słoczyński, Tymon, 2019. "Mostly Harmless Simulations? Using Monte Carlo Studies for Estimator Selection," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1192, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Advani, Arun & Kitagawa, Toru & Sloczynski, Tymon, 2019. "Mostly Harmless Simulations? Using Monte Carlo Studies for Estimator Selection," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 411, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
- Ferraro, Paul J. & Miranda, Juan José, 2014. "The performance of non-experimental designs in the evaluation of environmental programs: A design-replication study using a large-scale randomized experiment as a benchmark," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PA), pages 344-365.
- James J. Heckman & Petra E. Todd, 2009.
"A note on adapting propensity score matching and selection models to choice based samples,"
Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 12(s1), pages 230-234, January.
- Heckman, James J. & Todd, Petra E., 2009. "A Note on Adapting Propensity Score Matching and Selection Models to Choice Based Samples," IZA Discussion Papers 4304, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- James J. Heckman & Petra E. Todd, 2009. "A Note on Adapting Propensity Score Matching and Selection Models to Choice Based Samples," NBER Working Papers 15179, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Advani, Arun & Sloczynski, Tymon, 2013.
"Mostly Harmless Simulations? On the Internal Validity of Empirical Monte Carlo Studies,"
IZA Discussion Papers
7874, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Advani, Arun & Kitagawa, Toru & Sloczynski, Tymon, 2018. "Mostly Harmless Simulations? On the Internal Validity of Empirical Monte Carlo Studies," IZA Discussion Papers 11862, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Arun Advani & Toru Kitagawa & Tymon Sloczynski, 2018. "Mostly Harmless Simulations? On the Internal Validity of Empirical Monte Carlo Studies," Working Papers 124, Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School.
- Arun Advani & Toru Kitagawa & Tymon Sloczynski, 2018. "Mostly harmless simulations? On the internal validity of empirical Monte Carlo studies," CeMMAP working papers CWP56/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Arun Advani & Tymon Sloczynski, 2013. "Mostly harmless simulations? On the internal validity of empirical Monte Carlo studies," CeMMAP working papers CWP64/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Arun Advani & Tymon Słoczyński, 2013. "Mostly harmless simulations? On the internal validity of empirical Monte Carlo studies," CeMMAP working papers 64/13, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
More about this item
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-ECM-2020-12-14 (Econometrics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2011.11485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2011.11485.html