IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/339005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

U.S. Agricultural Policy Review, 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Baldwin, Katherine
  • Williams, Brian
  • Sichko, Christopher
  • Tsiboe, Francis
  • Toossi, Saied
  • Jones, Jordan W.
  • Turner, Dylan
  • Raszap Skorbiansky, Sharon

Abstract

This is the 2022 edition of the annual series documenting developments in U.S. agricultural policies, with a focus on policies related to production agriculture, agrofood value chains, and food and nutrition assistance. Developments related to production agriculture include temporary assistance programs in response to extreme weather and the continuing effects of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic; changes to standing farm programs, including commodity programs, conservation programs, credit programs, and crop insurance; the development of new programs, including the Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities, and the allocation of additional resources for existing USDA conservation programs to support the adoption of certain practices with climate mitigation benefits; the introduction of new measures and programs focused on improving equity; updates to USDA organic regulations and the launch of new programs to support producers transitioning to organic operations; and developments in certain laws and regulations overseen by agencies other than USDA that affect the agricultural sector. In 2022, developments in agrofood value chain policies related to the continued economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and supply chain vulnerabilities. In the realm of food and nutrition assistance, 2022 saw the continued development of temporary changes to existing food assistance programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; the establishment of a new permanent Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer program; the implementation of various emergency actions to respond to reduced infant formula availability; and the release of a National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health in conjunction with the White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health.

Suggested Citation

  • Baldwin, Katherine & Williams, Brian & Sichko, Christopher & Tsiboe, Francis & Toossi, Saied & Jones, Jordan W. & Turner, Dylan & Raszap Skorbiansky, Sharon, 2023. "U.S. Agricultural Policy Review, 2022," Economic Information Bulletin 339005, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:339005
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339005/files/eib-260.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jones, Jordan & Toossi, Saied & Hodges, Leslie, 2022. "The Food and Nutrition Assistance Landscape: Fiscal Year 2021 Annual Report," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 2022(Economic ), June.
    2. Goodrich, Brittney & Kiesel, Kristin & Bruno, Ellen, 2021. "Differential Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on California’s Produce and Nut Industries," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(01), June.
    3. Buzby, Jean C. & Farah-Wells, Hodan & Hyman, Jeffrey, 2014. "The Estimated Amount, Value, and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States," Economic Information Bulletin 164262, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Toossi, Saied & Jones, Jordan W., 2023. "The Food and Nutrition Assistance Landscape: Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Report," Economic Information Bulletin 337564, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baldwin, Katherine & Williams, Brian & Turner, Dylan & Tsiboe, Francis & Raszap Skorbiansky, Sharon & Sichko, Christopher & Jones, Jordan W. & Toossi, Saied, 2024. "U.S. Agricultural Policy Review, 2023," Economic Information Bulletin 349026, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Hrozencik, R. Aaron & Perez-Quesada, Gabriela & Bocinsky, Kyle, 2024. "The Stocking Impact and Financial-Climate Risk of the Livestock Forage Disaster Program," Economic Research Report 340568, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Bahrami, Shahin & Rouhi Rad, Mani & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2024. "Land Tenure and Conservation in Agriculture: Evidence from Nationwide Farm-level Data," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343986, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Jones, Jordan W. & Toossi, Saied, 2024. "The Food and Nutrition Assistance Landscape: Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Report," Economic Information Bulletin 344130, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Jordan W. & Toossi, Saied, 2024. "The Food and Nutrition Assistance Landscape: Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Report," Economic Information Bulletin 344130, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Baldwin, Katherine & Williams, Brian & Turner, Dylan & Tsiboe, Francis & Raszap Skorbiansky, Sharon & Sichko, Christopher & Jones, Jordan W. & Toossi, Saied, 2024. "U.S. Agricultural Policy Review, 2023," Economic Information Bulletin 349026, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Toossi, Saied & Todd, Jessica E. & Guthrie, Joanne & Ollinger, Michael, 2024. "The National School Lunch Program: Background, Trends, and Issues, 2024 Edition," Economic Information Bulletin 347312, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Sebastian K. Stankiewicz & Rafael Auras & Susan Selke, 2019. "Modeling American Household Fluid Milk Consumption and their Resulting Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    6. Hosni, Hanin & Giannakas, Konstantinos, 2022. "An Economic Analysis of a “Portion Size Reduction” Policy," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322331, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Ziqian Dong & Fang Li & Babak Beheshti & Alan Mickelson & Marta Panero & Nada Anid, 2016. "Autonomous real-time water quality sensing as an alternative to conventional monitoring to improve the detection of food, energy, and water indicators," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 6(1), pages 200-207, March.
    8. Ellison, Brenna & Kalaitzandonakes, Maria, 2020. "Food Waste and Covid-19: Impacts along the Supply Chain," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 10(164), September.
    9. Yu, Yang & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2021. "The effect of sell-by dates on purchase volume and food waste," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Beegle, Jeffrey R. & Borole, Abhijeet P., 2018. "Energy production from waste: Evaluation of anaerobic digestion and bioelectrochemical systems based on energy efficiency and economic factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-351.
    11. Rabbitt, Matthew P. & Hales, Laura J. & Burke, Michael P. & Coleman-Jensen, Alisha, 2023. "Household Food Security in the United States in 2022," Economic Research Report 338945, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Schmidt, Thomas G. & Baumgardt, Sandra & Blumenthal, Antonia & Burdick, Bernhard & Claupein, Erika & Dirksmeyer, Walter & Hafner, Gerold & Klockgether, Kathrin & Koch, Franziska & Leverenz, Dominik & , 2019. "Wege zur Reduzierung von Lebensmittelabfällen - Pathways to reduce food waste (REFOWAS): Maßnahmen, Bewertungsrahmen und Analysewerkzeuge sowie zukunftsfähige Ansätze für einen nachhaltigen Umgang mit," Thünen Reports 73,2, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    13. Delgado, Luciana & Schuster, Monica & Torero, Maximo, 2017. "Reality of Food Losses: A New Measurement Methodology," MPRA Paper 80378, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Johnson, Lisa K. & Dunning, Rebecca D. & Gunter, Chris C. & Dara Bloom, J. & Boyette, Michael D. & Creamer, Nancy G., 2018. "Field measurement in vegetable crops indicates need for reevaluation of on-farm food loss estimates in North America," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 136-142.
    15. Sandra Hoffmann & Lydia Ashton & Jae‐Wan Ahn, 2021. "Food safety: A policy history and introduction to avenues for economic research," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 680-700, June.
    16. Bohan Hou & Wenwen Yu & Zhengtong Chen & Jin Yu, 2023. "How Does the Farmland Management Scale Affect Grain Losses at Harvest? Analysis of Mediating Effect of Agricultural Input Based on Harvesting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Toossi, Saied & Jones, Jordan W., 2023. "The Food and Nutrition Assistance Landscape: Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Report," Economic Information Bulletin 337564, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Beata Bilska & Marzena Tomaszewska & Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska, 2022. "The Management of Meals in Food Service Establishments in the Context of Food Waste—Results of Focus Group Interviews with Employees and Owners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Brenna Ellison & Linlin Fan & Norbert L.W. Wilson, 2022. "Is it more convenient to waste? Trade‐offs between grocery shopping and waste behaviors," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(S1), pages 75-89, November.
    20. Marzena Tomaszewska & Beata Bilska & Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska, 2022. "The Influence of Selected Food Safety Practices of Consumers on Food Waste Due to Its Spoilage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:339005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.