IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersab/309836.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Size and Growth of the Nutritionally Improved Foods Market

Author

Listed:
  • Frazão, Elizabeth
  • Allshouse, Jane E.

Abstract

Sales of "nutritionally improved" food items grew at a faster pace than sales of "regular versions" in U.S. supermarkets between 1989 and 1993 even though nutritionally improved foods generally cost more. This study covered 37 food categories (such as cookies, hot dogs, and ice cream) and divided each category into two groups: "nutritionally improved versions" and "regular versions." The study used supermarket scanner data for the period. Volume share of nutritionally improved versions of the foods expanded from 36 percent in 1989 to 39 percent in 1993, and the dollar share of the nutritionally improved versions increased from 26 percent in 1989 to 30 percent in 1993. Volume sales for the 37 food categories increased a total of 10.9 billion units from 1989 to 1993, with nutritionally improved versions accounting for 78 percent of that increase. Dollar sales for the 37 food groups overall increased $11.3 billion in the same time period, with nutritionally improved versions accounting for 55 percent of that increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Frazão, Elizabeth & Allshouse, Jane E., 1996. "Size and Growth of the Nutritionally Improved Foods Market," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309836, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309836
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309836/files/aib723.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309836?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tippett, Katherine S. & Goldman, Joseph D., 1994. "Diets More Healthful, But Still Fall Short of Dietary Guidelines," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    2. Dumagan, Jesus C. & Hackett, John W., 1995. "U.S. Trends in Eating Away from Home, 1982-89: A Survey By Eating Occasion, Type of Foodservice Establishment and Kind of Food," Statistical Bulletin 154891, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Biing-Hwan & Yen, Steven T., 2007. "The U.S. Grain Consumption Landscape: Who Eats Grain, in What Form, Where, and How Much?," Economic Research Report 55967, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Blaylock, James & Smallwood, David & Kassel, Kathleen & Variyam, Jay & Aldrich, Lorna, 1999. "Economics, food choices, and nutrition," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2-3), pages 269-286, May.
    3. Teisl, Mario F. & Levy, Alan S., 1997. "Does Nutrition Labeling Lead To Healthier Eating?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 28(3), pages 1-10, October.
    4. Liddell, Sterling & Bailey, DeeVon, 2001. "Market Opportunities And Threats To The U.S. Pork Industry Posed By Traceability Systems," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16.
    5. Roe, Brian E. & Teisl, Mario F., 1998. "The Economics Of Labeling: An Overview Of Issues For Health And Environmental Disclosure," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-11, October.
    6. Unnevehr, Laurian J. & Villamil, Anne P. & Hasler, Clare, 1999. "Measuring Consumer Demand for Functional Foods and the Impact of Health Labeling Regulation," New Economic Approaches to Consumer Welfare and Nutrition - FAMC 1999 Conference 260291, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium (FAMC).
    7. Ricciuto, Laurie E. & Tarasuk, Valerie S., 2007. "An examination of income-related disparities in the nutritional quality of food selections among Canadian households from 1986-2001," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 186-198, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Kevin & Ali, Murad & Veeman, Michele & Unterschultz, Jim & Le, Theresa, 2002. "Relative Importance Rankings for Pork Attributes by Asian-Origin Consumers in California: Applying an Ordered Probit Model to a Choice-Based Sample," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 67-79, April.
    2. Hui, Jianguo & McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E. & Jones, Dewitt, 1995. "An Empirical Investigation Of Importance Ratings Of Meat Attributes By Louisiana And Texas Consumers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-8, December.
    3. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Hawkes, Gerard F. & Park, Kristen & Perosio, Debra J., 1995. "Supermarket Bakery Consumers: Attitudes, Preferences, Behaviors," Research Bulletins 122993, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 1998. "Assessing Concerns About The Fat Content Of Meats Among Primary Grocery Shoppers In Louisiana And Southeast Texas," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 1-6, February.
    5. Frazão, Elizabeth, 1995. "The American Diet: Health and Economic Consequences," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309727, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Saltos, Etta & Davis, Carole & Welsh, Susan & Guthrie, Joanne & Tamaki, Junko, 1994. "Using Food Labels to Follow the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: A Reference," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309722, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 2001. "An Analysis Of Nutritional Label Use In The Southern United States," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-5, March.
    8. Variyam, Jayachandran N. & Blaylock, James R. & Smallwood, David M., 1998. "Informational Effects Of Nutrient Intake Determinants On Cholesterol Consumption," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.