IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/tragwp/7216.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade-distorting SPS and TBT regulations in the EU? A qualitative assessment from the market for live plants and cut flowers

Author

Listed:
  • Drogue, Sophie
  • Gozlan, Estelle

Abstract

Using specific estimation of ad-valorem equivalents, the paper compares sectors where observed trade flows are significantly lower than predicted flows, with sectors where a SPS/TBT measure is notified in the TRAINS database. Only three sectors are found where a significant negative coefficient matches a notified regulation. Focusing on the market for live plants and cut flowers, the paper provides a description of existing EU import requirements and discusses recent trends in relevant private standards and certification schemes. The trade-restrictiveness of EU and private standards is then assessed based on the results of a survey conducted among exporters of flowers in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Drogue, Sophie & Gozlan, Estelle, 2007. "Trade-distorting SPS and TBT regulations in the EU? A qualitative assessment from the market for live plants and cut flowers," Working Papers 7216, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:tragwp:7216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/7216
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Disdier, Anne-Celia & Fontagne, Lionel & Mimouni, Mondher, 2007. "The Impact of Regulations on Agricultural Trade: Evidence from SPS and TBT Agreements," Working Papers 18869, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    2. van Uffelen, Ruud L.M. & de Groot, Nico S.P., 2005. "Floriculture world wide; production, trade and consumption patterns show market opportunities and challenges," Paper Series 29148, Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
    3. Otsuki, Tsunehiro & Wilson, John S. & Sewadeh, Mirvat, 2001. "Saving two in a billion: : quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards on African exports," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 495-514, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:tragwp:7216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://tradeag.vitamib.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.