IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saeasm/34999.html

Soyfood Consumption Pattern: Effects of Product Attributes and Household Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Rimal, Arbindra
  • Moon, Wanki
  • Balasubramanian, Siva K.

Abstract

Effects of perceived attributes of soyfoods on the consumption pattern for six different soyfood products were evaluated. Perceived attributes included convenience, health benefits, and taste. Six soyfood products were tofu, vegetable burgers, soy milk, soy supplements, meat substitutes, and soy cheese. This study used conceptual model that highlights the role of perceived attributes in a demand model by combining Lancaster's characteristics model with Fishbein's multi-attribute model. Zero-inflated negative binomial model (ZINB) was used as an empirical specification to address the zero consumption of soyfood products. Results show that perceived health attribute of soyfood had differential effects across the six soyfood products. While having a significant effect on other products, it did not influence tofu consumption decision. Convenience of preparation and consumption, and tastefulness had strong impacts consistently across all five types of soyfood products. The study identified several socio-economic characteristics of consumers that had a significant relationship with soyfood consumption patterns. However, these characteristics had varying effects across the six soyfood products. Implications for food industry are discussed in relation to the differential effects of health attributes and socio-demographic profiles.

Suggested Citation

  • Rimal, Arbindra & Moon, Wanki & Balasubramanian, Siva K., 2007. "Soyfood Consumption Pattern: Effects of Product Attributes and Household Characteristics," 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama 34999, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:saeasm:34999
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.34999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/34999/files/sp07ri01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.34999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moon, Wanki & Balasubramanian, Siva K. & Rimal, Arbindra, 2005. "Perceived Health Benefits and Soy Consumption Behavior: Two-Stage Decision Model Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van & Hoehn, John P., 1991. "Contingent Valuation and Food Safety: The Case of Pesticide Residues in Food," Staff Paper Series 201042, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rimal, Arbindra & Moon, Wanki & Balasubramanian, Siva K., 2006. "Estimating the Effect of FDA Allowed Health Claims on the Consumption of Soy-based Foods," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21151, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Rimal, Arbindra & Moon, Wanki & Balasubramanian, Siva K., 2008. "Changes in Soy Based Food Consumption, 2001 and 2007," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6888, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Sanders, Dwight R. & Moon, Wanki & Kuethe, Todd H., 2007. "Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Fresh Pork Attributes," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 25(2), pages 1-17.
    4. Chang, Jae Bong & Moon, Wanki & Balasubramanian, Siva K., 2009. "Health Concerns and Consumer Preferences for Soy Foods: Choice Modeling Approach," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49591, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Maynard, Leigh J. & Burdine, Kenneth H. & Meyer, A. Lee, 2003. "Market Potential for Locally Produced Meat Products," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 34(2), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Akgungor, Sedef & Miran, Bulent & Abay, Canan, 1999. "Consumer Willingness To Pay For Reduced Pesticide Residues In Tomatoes: The Turkish Case," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21578, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Osman GULSEVEN & Michael WOHLGENANT, 2017. "What are the factors affecting the consumers' milk choices?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(6), pages 271-282.
    8. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1993. "Research Needs in the Valuation of Food Safety and Nutrition," Staff Paper Series 201172, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    9. Osman Gulseven & Michael Wohlgenant, 2015. "A quality-based approach to estimating quantitative elasticities for differentiated products: an application to retail milk demand," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 2077-2096, September.
    10. Baker, Gregory A. & Crosbie, Peter J., 1993. "Measuring Food Safety Preferences: Identifying Consumer Segments," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Owens, Nicole N. & Swinton, Scott M. & Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1995. "Farmer Demand for Safer Pesticides," Staff Paper Series 201201, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    12. Vivien Foster & Susana Mourato, 2000. "Valuing the Multiple Impacts of Pesticide Use in the UK: A Contingent Ranking Approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Baker, Gregory A., 1998. "Strategic Implications Of Consumer Food Safety Preferences," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(4), pages 1-13.
    14. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van & Hoehn, John P., 1991. "Consumer Perspectives on Food Safety Issues: The Case of Pesticide Residues in Fresh Produce," Staff Paper Series 201045, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    15. Stavroula Malla & Jill E. Hobbs & Eric K. Sogah, 2016. "Estimating the Potential Benefits of New Health Claims in Canada: The Case of Soluble Fiber and Soy Protein," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(2), pages 173-197, June.
    16. Mischen, Pamela A. & Conklin, Neilson C., "undated". "The Role Of Usda Grade Standards In Quality Determination," Pesticide Use and Produce Quality: Proceedings of a Workshop 260055, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium (FAMC).
    17. Senauer, Benjamin, 1993. "The Impact Of Reduced Agricultural Chemical Use On Food: A Review Of The Literature For The United States," Working Papers 14450, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    18. Balasubramanian, Siva K. & Moon, Wanki & Rimal, Arbindra & Coker, Kesha, 2009. "Antecedents Factors that Influence Soy Consumption: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49593, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Gregory A. Baker & Peter J. Crosbie, 1994. "Consumer preferences for food safety attributes: A market segment approach," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(4), pages 319-324.
    20. Moon, Wanki & Balasubramanian, Siva K. & Rimal, Arbindra, 2011. "Health claims and consumers' behavioral intentions: The case of soy-based food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 480-489, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saeasm:34999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.