IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Technological Change In The U.S. Beef And Pork Sectors: Impacts On Farm-Wholesale Marketing Margins And Livestock Prices

Listed author(s):
  • Marsh, John M.
  • Brester, Gary W.
Registered author(s):

    Real livestock prices and farm-wholesale marketing margins have steadily declined over the past 20 years. Many studies have examined the effects of increasing packer concentration on these declines. However, most have generally failed to account directly for technological change in livestock production and red meat slaughtering. We estimate reduced form models for beef and pork farm-wholesale marketing margins and cattle and hog prices that specifically include measures of technological change. Empirical results indicate that meat packing technology has reduced real margins and technological change embodied in cattle and hog production accounts for substantial declines in real slaughter cattle and hog prices. When technological change is explicitly considered, we find that increasing packer concentration: (1) does not affect real farm-wholesale marketing margins, (2) positively affects real slaughter cattle prices, and (3) does not affect real slaughter hog prices.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics in its series Trade Research Center Research Discussion Papers with number 29242.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 1999
    Handle: RePEc:ags:motrdp:29242
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    306 Linfield Hall, Bozeman, MT 59715-0292

    Phone: (406) 994-3701
    Fax: (406) 994-4838
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Lee, Jung-Hee & Brorsen, B. Wade, 1994. "Effect of Risk Aversion on Feeder Cattle Prices," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(02), pages 386-392, December.
    2. Ted C. Schroeder & Clement E. Ward & James R. Mintert & Derrell S. Peel, 1998. "Value-Based Pricing of Fed Cattle: Challenges and Research Agenda," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 125-134.
    3. Eales, James S., 1994. "The Inverse Lewbel Demand System," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(01), July.
    4. Dunn, James E. & Heien, Dale, 1985. "The Demand For Farm Output," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(01), July.
    5. Lustgarten, Steven, 1979. "Gains and Losses from Concentration: A Comment," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(1), pages 183-190, April.
    6. James Kliebenstein & Peter F. Orazem, 1999. "The Structure of Wages and Benefits in the U.S. Pork Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(1), pages 144-163.
    7. Brester, Gary W. & Mustek, Douglas C., 1995. "The Effect of Market Concentration on Lamb Marketing Margins," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(01), pages 172-183, July.
    8. John M. Marsh, 1999. "The Effects of Breeding Stock Productivity on the U.S. Beef Cattle Cycle," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(2), pages 335-346.
    9. Brester, Gary W. & Schroeder, Ted C. & Mintert, James R., 1997. "Challenges to the Beef Industry," Choices, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 12(4).
    10. Brester, Gary W. & Musick, Douglas C., 1995. "The Effect Of Market Concentration On Lamb Marketing Margins," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(01), July.
    11. Donald W. Anderson & Brian C. Murray & Jackqueline L. Teague & Richard C. Lindrooth, 1998. "Exit from the Meatpacking Industry: A Microdata Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(1), pages 96-106.
    12. Quail, Gwen & Marion, Bruce & Geithman, Frederick & Marquardt, Jeffrey, 1986. "The Impact of Packer Buyer Concentration on Live Cattle Prices," Working Papers 204089, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Food System Research Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:motrdp:29242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.