IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/icarpp/344991.html

Farmer Producer Organizations in India: Challenges and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Nikam, V.
  • Veesam, H.
  • Kiran Kumara, T.M.
  • Chand, P.

Abstract

Farmers’ collectives such as the FPOs that combine the spirit of cooperation and principles of business can significantly contribute to agricultural growth and rural development by improving the scale economies in the production and marketing of agricultural commodities, especially in agrarian economies dominated by smallholders. Farmers benefit from their association with FPOs in several ways — better and affordable access to technologies, inputs, information, services, finances and markets, higher price realization, less price risk, and reduction in transaction costs. Recognizing these benefits, the Government of India has increasingly focused on establishing and nurturing FPOs to strengthen backward and forward linkages of agriculture for the benefit of the smallholders who are a force to reckon with in Indian agriculture. Currently, there are more than 24000 FPOs registered under the Indian Companies Act, undertaking several agricultural activities, and 10,000 more FPOs are to be nurtured by 2027-28 under the central sector scheme. However, our understanding of the performance of FPOs in terms of their socio-economic impacts, inclusiveness, governance and financial viability is limited. This paper, based on an extensive review of literature, synthesizes empirical evidence on the impacts of FPOs at the farm, market and society levels, identifies their weaknesses and strengths in terms of financial viability and governance, and assesses the institutional and policy requirements for making FPOs as a preferred vehicle for inclusive agricultural development. I congratulate the authors of this paper for their painstaking efforts in compiling and synthesizing information on different dimensions of FPOs and putting these succinctly in this paper. I hope the findings may serve as evidence-based feedback to policymakers and institutions promoting FPOs, and for FPOs themselves to take corrective measures to improve their outreach and performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikam, V. & Veesam, H. & Kiran Kumara, T.M. & Chand, P., 2023. "Farmer Producer Organizations in India: Challenges and Prospects," Policy Papers 344991, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:icarpp:344991
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344991/files/pp40.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Anjani & Saroj, Sunil & Joshi, P.K. & Takeshima, Hiroyuki, 2018. "Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from a panel data analysis of smallholder dairy farmers in Bihar, India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 24-36.
    2. Hazell, Peter & Poulton, Colin & Wiggins, Steve & Dorward, Andrew, 2010. "The Future of Small Farms: Trajectories and Policy Priorities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1349-1361, October.
    3. Verma, Smriti & Sonkar, Vinay Kumar & Kumar, Anjani & Roy, Devesh, . "Are farmer producer organizations a boon to farmers? the evidence from Bihar, India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 32(Conferenc).
    4. Surender Mor & Supran Sharma, 2012. "Technical efficiency and supply chain practices in dairying: The case of India," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(2), pages 85-91.
    5. Linda Shaw, 2006. "Overview of Corporate Governance Issues for Co-operatives," World Bank Publications - Reports 26128, The World Bank Group.
    6. Roy, Devesh & Thorat, Amit, 2008. "Success in High Value Horticultural Export Markets for the Small Farmers: The Case of Mahagrapes in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1874-1890, October.
    7. Markelova, Helen & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Hellin, Jon & Dohrn, Stephan, 2009. "Collective action for smallholder market access," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-7, February.
    8. Priscilla, L & Chauhan, AK, 2019. "Economic impact of cooperative membership on dairy farmers in Manipur: a propensity score matching approach," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 32(01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ags:icar24:344991 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Hery Toiba & Moh Shadiqur Rahman & Rachman Hartono & Dwi Retnoningsih, 2024. "Improving dairy farmers’ welfare in Indonesia: Does cooperative membership matter?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 1003-1019, December.
    3. von Braun, Joachim & Mirzabaev, Alisher, 2015. "Small Farms: Changing Structures and Roles in Economic Development," Discussion Papers 210464, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    4. Yanyuan Zhang & Xintong Wu, 2023. "Risk Management Effects of Insurance Purchase and Organization Participation: Which Is More Effective?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Sukhpal Singh, 2023. "(Farmer) Producer Companies in India as new generation cooperatives: Case studies of performance and impact from West Bengal, India," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 1007-1029, September.
    6. Wanglin Ma & Hongyun Zheng & Yueji Zhu & Jianling Qi, 2022. "Effects of cooperative membership on financial performance of banana farmers in China: A heterogeneous analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 5-27, March.
    7. Hao, Jinghui & Heerink, Nico & Heijman, Wim & Bijman, Jos, "undated". "Cooperatives Membership And Smallholder Farmers’ Welfare - Evidence From Shaanxi And Shandong Provinces, China," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260914, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Ellen Verhofstadt & Miet Maertens, 2014. "Smallholder cooperatives and agricultural performance in Rwanda: do organizational differences matter?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(S1), pages 39-52, November.
    9. Ray, Soumyajit & Raghunathan, Kalyani & Bhanjdeo, Arundhita & Heckert, Jessica, 2024. "Can farmer collectives empower women and improve their welfare? Mixed methods evidence from India," IFPRI discussion papers 2267, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. McNamara, Paul E. & Lee, Han Bum, "undated". "Strengthening Nutrition and Improving Livelihoods through Linking Women Farmers to Markets," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258091, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Xiaolu Wei & Junhu Ruan, 2022. "Influences of Government Policies and Farmers’ Cognition on Farmers’ Participation Willingness and Behaviors in E-Commerce Interest Linkage Mechanisms during Farmer–Enterprise Games," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Elisabeth Fischer & Matin Qaim, 2014. "Smallholder Farmers and Collective Action: What Determines the Intensity of Participation?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(3), pages 683-702, September.
    13. Kleemann, Linda, 2011. "Organic pineapple farming in Ghana: A good choice for smallholders?," Kiel Working Papers 1671, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    14. Verena Bitzer & Pieter Glasbergen & Bas Arts, 2013. "Exploring the potential of intersectoral partnerships to improve the position of farmers in global agrifood chains: findings from the coffee sector in Peru," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(1), pages 5-20, March.
    15. Agbo, Maxime & Rousselière, Damien & Salanié, Julien, 2015. "Agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling: A cooperative–non-cooperative game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 56-71.
    16. Verhofstadt, Ellen & Maertens, Miet, 2013. "Cooperative membership and agricultural performance: Evidence from Rwanda," Working Papers 157389, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    17. Luitfred Kissoly & Anja Faße & Ulrike Grote, 2017. "The integration of smallholders in agricultural value chain activities and food security: evidence from rural Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1219-1235, December.
    18. Atiqur Rahman, 2017. "Smallholder Agriculture and Inclusive Rural Transformation," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 40(1-2), pages 119-147.
    19. Latynskiy, Evgeny & Berger, Thomas, 2016. "Networks of Rural Producer Organizations in Uganda: What Can be Done to Make Them Work Better?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 572-586.
    20. Nalini Bikkina & Rama Mohana R. Turaga & Vaibhav Bhamoriya, 2018. "Farmer producer organizations as farmer collectives: A case study from India," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(6), pages 669-687, October.
    21. Kumar, Anjani & Saroj, Sunil & Joshi, P.K. & Takeshima, Hiroyuki, 2018. "Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from a panel data analysis of smallholder dairy farmers in Bihar, India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 24-36.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:icarpp:344991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ncapgin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.