IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/277296.html

The Global Food Security Safety Dilemma of Fertiliser Technology Use: An Analysis of Policy-Induced Mediation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang, T.
  • Malik, T.
  • Nielsen, K.

Abstract

The world s natural population growth has generated a paradoxical challenge between food security and safety (environmental quality). In this paper, we address this question to establish the security safety paradox by examining increased fertiliser use on decreasing land endowment, and we establish how policy inducement reflects on the food security versus safety issue. Based on the generalised method of moment estimations and panel data of 72 countries from 2002 to 2010, we for the first time answer this question and offer insightful developments in this direction. Firstly, we observe that shrinking land endowment has significant direct and indirect impacts (agricultural protection and food trade policies). Our analysis demonstrates that a decrease in the land endowment increases the fertiliser use intensity. Secondly, policy for agricultural protection induces different effects on security and safety issues in development and world economies. Developed countries have introduced policies to reduce fertiliser usage trading food security for safety. By contrast, developing countries have introduced policies to increase food security trading food safety for security. Thus, developed countries tend to import food from developing countries to bridge the gap, and developing countries achieve economic gains. Acknowledgement : This research was supported by the fundings sponsered by an agreement between FAO and CSC of China, Humanities and Social Science Fund from Ministry of Education (16YJC790112, 15YJA790093), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71673041) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (N150604006). We would like to thank participants at the 2015 CES conference in Chengdu and at the 2016 sino-Korea regional economics conference in Kyungsung University, Korea for helpful comments.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang, T. & Malik, T. & Nielsen, K., 2018. "The Global Food Security Safety Dilemma of Fertiliser Technology Use: An Analysis of Policy-Induced Mediation," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277296, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277296
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277296/files/1574.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Millstone, Erik, 2009. "Science, risk and governance: Radical rhetorics and the realities of reform in food safety governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 624-636, May.
    2. Hertel, Thomas W., 2015. "The Challenges of Sustainably Feeding a Growing Planet," 2015 Conference (59th), February 10-13, 2015, Rotorua, New Zealand 202525, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    4. Antle, John M & Heidebrink, Gregg, 1995. "Environment and Development: Theory and International Evidence," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(3), pages 603-625, April.
    5. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    6. Wilson, John S. & Otsuki, Tsunehiro, 2004. "To spray or not to spray: pesticides, banana exports, and food safety," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 131-146, April.
    7. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    8. John G Knight & David K Holdsworth & Damien W Mather, 2007. "Country-of-origin and choice of food imports: an in-depth study of European distribution channel gatekeepers," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 38(1), pages 107-125, January.
    9. Schreinemachers, Pepijn & Tipraqsa, Prasnee, 2012. "Agricultural pesticides and land use intensification in high, middle and low income countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 616-626.
    10. Amarendra Singh & K. Narayanan, 2015. "Impact of economic growth and population on agrochemical use: evidence from post-liberalization India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1509-1525, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang, Tao & Malik, Tariq H. & Nielsen, Klaus, 2020. "The impact of population pressure on global fertiliser use intensity, 1970–2011: An analysis of policy-induced mediation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Amarendra Singh & K. Narayanan, 2015. "Impact of economic growth and population on agrochemical use: evidence from post-liberalization India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1509-1525, December.
    3. Tamazian, Artur & Bhaskara Rao, B., 2010. "Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 137-145, January.
    4. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    5. Sebri, Maamar, 2009. "La Zone Méditerranéenne Face à la Pollution de L’air : Une Investigation Econométrique [The Mediterranean Zone in front of Air pollution: an Econometric Investigation]," MPRA Paper 32382, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Mina Baliamoune-Lutz, 2017. "Trade and Environmental Quality in African Countries: Do Institutions Matter?," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 43(1), pages 155-172, January.
    7. Ajanaku, B.A. & Collins, A.R., 2021. "Economic growth and deforestation in African countries: Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis applicable?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Fang, Wen Shwo & Miller, Stephen M. & Yeh, Chih-Chuan, 2012. "The effect of ESCOs on energy use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 558-568.
    9. Managi, Shunsuke & Jena, Pradyot Ranjan, 2008. "Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 432-440, April.
    10. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Butkus, Mindaugas, 2017. "Environmental Kuznets Curve of greenhouse gas emissions including technological progress and substitution effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 237-248.
    11. Arminen, Heli & Menegaki, Angeliki N., 2019. "Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 621-634.
    12. Huang, Bwo-Nung & Hwang, M.J. & Yang, C.W., 2008. "Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: A dynamic panel data approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 41-54, August.
    13. Yi-Bin Chiu, 2012. "Deforestation and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Developing Countries: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 60(2), pages 177-194, June.
    14. James Temitope Dada & Folorunsho Monsur Ajide & Adams Adeiza, 2022. "Shadow Economy and Environmental Pollution in West African Countries: The Role of Institutions," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 14(3), pages 366-389, September.
    15. Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj & Tisdell, Clement Allan, 2017. "On environmental impacts of market-based reforms: Evidence from the European and Central Asian transition economies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 44-52.
    16. Makarov, Igor & Alataş, Sedat, 2024. "Production- and consumption-based emissions in carbon exporters and importers: A large panel data analysis for the EKC hypothesis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    17. Brännlund Runar & Karimu Amin & Söderholm Patrik, 2017. "Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions and the role of growth and institutions: a parametric and non-parametric analysis," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(2), pages 359-390, April.
    18. Panagiotis Nikolaos Fotis & Victoria Pekka, 2017. "The effect of renewable energy use and economic growth on pollution in the EUROZONE," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 88-99.
    19. Prathibha Joshi & Kris Aaron Beck, 2015. "Biological Oxygen Demand and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(02), pages 1-15.
    20. Barra, Cristian & Zotti, Roberto, 2016. "Investigating the impact of national income on environmental pollution. International evidence," MPRA Paper 74149, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.