IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/hebarc/18340.html

Business Organization and Coordination in Marketing Specialty Hogs: A Comparative Analysis of Two Firms from Iowa

Author

Listed:
  • Hueth, Brent
  • Ibarburu, Maro A.
  • Kliebenstein, James B.

Abstract

We study business organization and coordination of specialty-market hog production using a comparative analysis of two Iowa pork niche-marketing firms. We describe and analyze each firm's management of five key organizational challenges: planning and logistics, quality assurance, process verification and management of "credence attributes," business structure, and profit sharing. Although each firm is engaged in essentially the same activity, there are substantial differences across the two firms in the way production and marketing are coordinated. These differences are partly explained by the relative size and age of each firm, thus highlighting the importance of organizational evolution in agricultural markets, but are also partly the result of a formal organizational separation between marketing and production activities in one of the firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Hueth, Brent & Ibarburu, Maro A. & Kliebenstein, James B., 2005. "Business Organization and Coordination in Marketing Specialty Hogs: A Comparative Analysis of Two Firms from Iowa," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18340, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18340
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18340/files/wp050415.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.18340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian L. Buhr, 2004. "Case Studies of Direct Marketing Value-Added Pork Products in a Commodity Market," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 266-279.
    2. Dimitri, Carolyn & Greene, Catherine R., 2002. "Recent Growth Patterns In The U.S. Organic Foods Market," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33715, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Brian L. Buhr, 2004. "Case Studies of Direct Marketing Value-Added Pork Products in a Commodity Market," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 266-279.
    4. Lokman Zaibet & Maury Brendahl, 1997. "Gains from ISO certification in the UK meat sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(4), pages 375-384.
    5. P. Lynn Kennedy & R. Wes Harrison & Nicholas G. Kalaitzandonakes & H. Christopher Peterson & Ronald P. Rindfuss, 1997. "Perspectives on evaluating competitiveness in agribusiness industries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(4), pages 385-392.
    6. Gary W. Brester, 1999. "Vertical Integration of Production Agriculture Into Value-Added Niche Markets: The Case of Wheat Montana Farms & Bakery," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 276-285.
    7. Jennifer Grannis & Dawn D. Thilmany, 2002. "Marketing natural pork: An empirical analysis of consumers in the mountain region," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 475-489.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brent Hueth & Maro Ibarburu & James Kliebenstein, 2007. "Marketing Specialty Hogs: A Comparative Analysis of Two Firms from Iowa," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 720-733.
    2. Furtan, H. & Sauer, J., . "Determinants of Food Industry Performance – Survey Data and Regressions for Denmark," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44.
    3. W. H. Furtan & J. Sauer, 2008. "Determinants of Food Industry Performance: Survey Data and Regressions for Denmark," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 555-573, September.
    4. Inderhees, Philipp & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2006. "Farmers' strategies in globalization markets: Empirical results from Germany," 98th Seminar, June 29-July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece 10053, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Ortmann, Gerald F., 2000. "Promoting competitiveness in South African agriculture and agribusiness: The role of institutions," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(4), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Paudel, Krishna P. & Park, Timothy A. & Pandit, Mahesh, "undated". "U.S. Farmers' Decision to Choose Direct Sales Channel: A Fractional Seemingly Unrelated Semiparametric Model," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258370, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Zalewski, Romuald I. & Skawinska, Eulalia, 2002. "Determinants of Quality Management Efficiency in Polish Food Processing Industry," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24891, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Traversac, Jean-Baptiste & Rousset, Sylvain & Perrier-Cornet, Philippe, 2011. "Farm resources, transaction costs and forward integration in agriculture: Evidence from French wine producers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 839-847.
    9. Lohr, Luanne, 2002. "Benefits of U.S. organic agriculture," MPRA Paper 24327, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. O’Dierno, Linda J. & Govindasamy, Ramu & Puduri, Venkata S. & Myers, Joseph J. & Islam, Sho, 2006. "Consumer Perceptions and Preferences for Organic Aquatic Products: Results from the Telephone Survey," P Series 36743, Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics.
    11. Henson, Spencer J. & Sparling, David & Herath, Deepananda P.B. & Dessureault, Simon, 2005. "Traceability in the Canadian Dairy Processing Sector," Economic and Market Information 55303, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    12. Wang, H. Holly & Ge, Yuanlong, 2008. "Will Too Many Lower Quality Fruits Damage The Organic Market," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 36976, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Herzfeld, Thomas & Drescher, Larissa S. & Grebitus, Carola, 2011. "Cross-national adoption of private food quality standards," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 401-411, June.
    14. Michal Chocholousek & Zuzana Hlouskova & Tereza Simova & Jan Huml, 2021. "Agriculture farms product differentiation assessment in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(3), pages 81-89.
    15. Nicholson, Charles F. & Stephenson, Mark W., 2006. "Financial Performance and Other Characteristics of On-Farm Dairy Processing Enterprises in New York, Vermont and Wisconsin," Research Bulletins 121583, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    16. Nehring, Richard & Gillespie, Jeffrey & Harris, J. Michael Harris, "undated". "The Economics and Productivity of Organic versus Non-organic U.S. Dairy Farms," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273123, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Schroeter, Christiane & Cai, Xiaowei, 2011. "It’s All About Produce: Flexing the Muscles of Western U.S. Organic Spinach Consumption," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13.
    18. Laurian J. Unnevehr & Helen H. Jensen, 2001. "Industry Compliance Costs: What Would They Look Like in a Risk-Based Integrated Food System?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 01-wp278, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    19. Bernard, Daria J. & Mathios, Alan D., 2005. "Factors Affecting Consumer Choice and Willingness to Pay for Milk Attributes," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19366, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Choi, Hee Jung & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 2012. "Demand Analysis of Fluid Milk with Different Attributes," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124746, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.