IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudarb/122100.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Marketing and Merchandising Practices for Fresh Sweet Corn in Supermarkets -- Challenges and Opportunities for the New York State Fresh Sweet Corn Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Cuellar, Sandra
  • Uva, Wen-fei L.

Abstract

This study focused on investigating key issues related to marketing fresh sweet corn through supermarket firms and implications for the New York sweet corn industry. In summer 2002, a survey was conducted with supermarket firms that operate stores in the market area of three Northeast States - New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Executives from 25 supermarket firms responded to the survey. Participating firms operated 921 stores, and their 2000 sales ranged from $21 million to $10.5 billion with total retail sales of $24.5 billion in the year. The majority of supermarket firms in the study sourced fresh sweet corn directly from grower/shippers during the summer season (July – September). During the rest of the year, wholesalers become more important as the main source of this product due to their competitive advantage of being able to source product from different regions. The three most important methods used by supermarket firms to identify their fresh sweet corn suppliers are 1) personal relationships/referrals, 2) sales calls from grower/shippers, and 3) “other” ways, such as memory from previous years, through their wholesalers, and from terminal markets. Large firms also emphasized their use of shippers’ directories and field offices. The three most important characteristics sought in suppliers of fresh sweet corn by participating supermarket firms are supplier’s ability to provide consistent quality, ability to make daily deliveries, and the prospect of developing a good relationship. During the summer season, fresh sweet corn grown in New York State plays an important role among supermarket firms in the trading area studied. Its major competitor is sweet corn from New Jersey. Small and medium firms, as well as firms in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, preferred white corn, while large firms and firms in New York State preferred bi-color corn. These preferences are determined by customers’ preferences and demands. During the summer season, most of the fresh sweet corn marketed by participating supermarket firms is marketed bulk and un-shucked. The market share of tray-packed fresh sweet corn, either partially shucked or completely shucked, is still very small. Other forms of fresh sweet corn that supermarket firms would be interested in selling in their stores are mainly related to value-added and/or ready-to-cook products, such as microwave-ready trays. Results confirmed that supermarkets mainly promote fresh sweet corn during the traditional holidays of Memorial Day, the 4th of July and Labor Day. Quality, availability and price are the other factors that determine when supermarket firms run a promotion on fresh sweet corn. According to participating supermarket firms, the most effective strategies to promote fresh sweet corn, and where the biggest expansion efforts should be focused, are: locally-grown, in-store display features, store flyers and discount sales. Participating supermarket firms that purchased fresh sweet corn grown in New York State rated taste and quality of the New York product as good. Availability, shelf-life and shipping containers were rated somewhat lower -- between average and good. Medium-size supermarket firms were less satisfied with New York products’ attributes. In general, dependability of New York grower/shippers was rated as good. On-time delivery was also rated good except by medium-size supermarket firms and by New York State firms. Promotional support from New York sweet corn suppliers was the attribute with the lowest rating across all firm categories and particularly among New York State firms. These results clearly indicate that there are opportunities for the New York sweet corn industry to improve fresh sweet corn sales through supermarkets in the trading area of the study. Supermarkets of different sizes and in different regions (States of New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania in this study) have different needs and expectations. Sweet corn grower/shippers need to strive to meet the needs and ensure the satisfaction of their various clients.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuellar, Sandra & Uva, Wen-fei L., 2004. "Marketing and Merchandising Practices for Fresh Sweet Corn in Supermarkets -- Challenges and Opportunities for the New York State Fresh Sweet Corn Industry," Research Bulletins 122100, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122100
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.122100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/122100/files/Cornell_Dyson_rb0406.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.122100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schmit, Todd M. & Kaiser, Harry M., 2007. "Optimal Seasonal Allocation of Generic Dairy Advertising Expenditures," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 187-199, April.
    2. Uva, Wen-fei L., 2004. "Sweet Corn Marketing Channels In New York State -- A New York Sweet Corn Grower Survey," Research Bulletins 122097, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    3. Kaufman, Phillip R. & Handy, Charles R. & McLaughlin, Edward W. & Park, Kristen & Green, Geoffrey M., 2000. "Understanding The Dynamics Of Produce Markets: Consumption And Consolidation Grow," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33747, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Uva, Wen-fei L., 2004. "Sweet Corn Marketing Channels In New York State -- A New York Sweet Corn Grower Survey," Research Bulletins 122099, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uva, Wen-fei L., 2004. "Sweet Corn Marketing Channels In New York State -- A New York Sweet Corn Grower Survey," Research Bulletins 122097, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Uva, Wen-fei L., 2004. "Sweet Corn Marketing Channels In New York State -- A New York Sweet Corn Grower Survey," Research Bulletins 122099, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uva, Wen-fei L., 2004. "Sweet Corn Marketing Channels In New York State -- A New York Sweet Corn Grower Survey," Research Bulletins 122097, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Li, Chenguang & Sexton, Richard J., 2009. "Impacts of Retailers’ Pricing Strategies for Produce Commodities on Farmer Welfare," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51720, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Padilla Bernal Luz Evelia & Reyes Rivas Eliver & Pérez Veyna Oscar, 2012. "Evaluación de un cluster bajo agricultura protegida en México," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 57(3), pages 219-237, julio-sep.
    4. Xia, Tian & Sancewich, Brian, 2012. "Retail Markets and Buyer Power in Agricultural Procurements," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124929, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Uva, Wen-fei L., 2004. "Sweet Corn Marketing Channels In New York State -- A New York Sweet Corn Grower Survey," Research Bulletins 122099, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    6. Omar Ahumada & J. Villalobos, 2011. "A tactical model for planning the production and distribution of fresh produce," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 339-358, October.
    7. Alwin Dsouza & Ashok K. Mishra & Scott Webster, 2023. "Vertical coordination and post‐harvest losses: Implications on food loss," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 460-486, March.
    8. Kuchler, Fred & Stewart, Hayden, 2008. "Price Trends Are Similar for Fruits, Vegetables, and Snack Foods," Economic Research Report 56447, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Hinson, Roger A. & Sinoha, Ramona & Reaves, Dixie Watts, 2006. "Industry Concentration Impacts on Business Strategies Used by Small Produce Wholesalers," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35291, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. Sterns, James A. & Codron, Jean-Marie, 2001. "Why Adopt Integrated Crop Production? A Perspective From The French Fruit Sector," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20715, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Leroux, Nicole & Wortman, Max S., Jr. & Mathias, Eric D., 2001. "Dominant Factors Impacting The Development Of Business-To-Business (B2b) E-Commerce In Agriculture," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14.
    12. Padilla-Bernal, Luz E. & Thilmany, Dawn D. & Loureiro, Maria L., 2003. "An Empirical Analysis of Market Integration and Efficiency for U.S. Fresh Tomato Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Pei-Chun Lin & Liang-Shan Wu, 2009. "How supermarket chains in Taiwan select suppliers of fresh fruit and vegetables via direct purchasing," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 1237-1255, September.
    14. Paul N. Wilson & Gary D. Thompson, 2003. "Time Integration: Agribusiness Structure for Competitive Advantage," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 30-43.
    15. Ballenger, Nicole & Offutt, Susan, 2001. "Should Governments Support Food Product Differentiation Schemes?," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 171986, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Woods, Timothy A. & Saghaian, Sayed H. & Ona, Lucia Y., 2009. "Will Higher Shipping Costs Drive the U.S. to Source More Localized Produce?," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46872, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    17. Chenarides, Lauren & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2016. "Store Choice and Consumer Behavior in Food Deserts: An Empirical Application of the Distance Metric Method," 2017 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 6-8, 2017, Chicago, Illinois 250118, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Saoli Chanda & Mahadev Bhat & Kateel G. Shetty & Krishnaswamy Jayachandran, 2021. "Technology, Policy, and Market Adaptation Mechanisms for Sustainable Fresh Produce Industry: The Case of Tomato Production in Florida, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Rickard, Bradley J. & Schmit, Todd M. & Gomez, Miguel I. & Lu, Hao, 2011. "Does the Name Matter? Developing Brands for Patented Fruit Varieties," Working Papers 126603, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    20. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.