IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404508.html

1 Risk and Returns: Economic Drivers of Agrivoltaics Adoption in the U.S. Midwest

Author

Listed:
  • Mwebaze, Paul
  • Khanna, Madhu
  • Majeed, Fahd
  • Mishra, Bijesh
  • Miao, Ruiqing

Abstract

Utility-scale solar expansion across U.S. croplands is intensifying food–energy land-use conflicts, particularly in the Midwest. Agrivoltaics (AV), the co-location of photovoltaic systems with agricultural production, offers a potential land-use solution, but its scalability depends on farmer adoption. This study examines how financial incentives, operational requirements, and behavioral factors shape AV adoption decisions using a discrete choice experiment with 177 farmers across 12 Midwestern states (708 choice observations). The experiment evaluates attributes that directly affect farm profitability, risk exposure, and management complexity, including lease payments, income variability, land share under panels, and requirements for new equipment or crop switching. We model adoption as a joint discrete–continuous decision, capturing both the likelihood of adoption and the extent of land allocation to AV. Results show that higher lease payments significantly increase both the probability of adoption and land allocation, highlighting the importance of stable and attractive compensation. In contrast, operational complexity, particularly requirements for new equipment, reduces adoption and generates substantial implicit costs in willingness-to-accept (WTA) estimates. Behavioral characteristics also matter: farmers with higher discount rates are less likely to adopt, whereas risk-tolerant farmers are more willing to participate. Latent class analysis further reveals substantial heterogeneity, distinguishing a majority of low-propensity farmers with little likelihood of adoption from a smaller AV-responsive segment whose adoption is more sensitive to lease compensation. Overall, the findings suggest that financially attractive and operationally simple AV contracts will be critical for scaling adoption while preserving agricultural production.

Suggested Citation

  • Mwebaze, Paul & Khanna, Madhu & Majeed, Fahd & Mishra, Bijesh & Miao, Ruiqing, 2026. "1 Risk and Returns: Economic Drivers of Agrivoltaics Adoption in the U.S. Midwest," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404508, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404508
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404508/files/AAEA%202026%20Selected%20Paper%20ID%20126524.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeddies, Hendrik Hilmar & Parlasca, Martin & Qaim, Matin, 2025. "Agrivoltaics increases public acceptance of solar energy production on agricultural land," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387.
    3. Wagner, Johanna & Bühner, Charlotte & Gölz, Sebastian & Trommsdorff, Max & Jürkenbeck, Kristin, 2024. "Factors influencing the willingness to use agrivoltaics: A quantitative study among German farmers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Yavorsky & Elisabeth Honka & Keith Chen, 2021. "Consumer search in the U.S. auto industry: The role of dealership visits," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-52, March.
    2. Laser, Falk & Hellwig, Michael, 2019. "Agony of Choice – Trading off Stability and Competition in the Banking Markets," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203536, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Cheng, Leilei & Yin, Changbin & Chien, Hsiaoping, 2015. "Demand for milk quantity and safety in urban China: evidence from Beijing and Harbin," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(2), April.
    4. Sebastian Heidenreich & Andrea Phillips-Beyer & Bruno Flamion & Melissa Ross & Jaein Seo & Kevin Marsh, 2021. "Benefit–Risk or Risk–Benefit Trade-Offs? Another Look at Attribute Ordering Effects in a Pilot Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(1), pages 65-74, January.
    5. Juan Carlos Suárez Serrato & Owen Zidar, 2016. "Who Benefits from State Corporate Tax Cuts? A Local Labor Markets Approach with Heterogeneous Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(9), pages 2582-2624, September.
    6. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Huang, Chia-Jung & Fu, Chiang, 2020. "Incorporating continuous representation of preferences for flight departure times into stated itinerary choice modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 10-20.
    7. Frith, Michael J., 2019. "Modelling taste heterogeneity regarding offence location choices," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    8. Saraswata Chaudhuriy & David T. Frazierz & Eric Renault, 2016. "Indirect Inference with Endogenously Missing Exogenous Variables," CIRANO Working Papers 2016s-15, CIRANO.
    9. Gao, Kun & Sun, Lijun & Yang, Ying & Meng, Fanyu & Qu, Xiaobo, 2021. "Cumulative prospect theory coupled with multi-attribute decision making for modeling travel behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-21.
    10. Conte, Anna & Scarsini, Marco & Sürücü, Oktay, 2016. "The impact of time limitation: Insights from a queueing experiment," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 260-274, May.
    11. Johannes Buggle & Thierry Mayer & Seyhun Orcan Sakalli & Mathias Thoenig, 2023. "The Refugee’s Dilemma: Evidence from Jewish Migration out of Nazi Germany," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(2), pages 1273-1345.
    12. David Müller & Vladimir Shikhman, 2022. "Network manipulation algorithm based on inexact alternating minimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 627-664, October.
    13. Teodora Boneva & Marta Golin & Katja Kaufmann & Christopher Rauh, 2026. "Beliefs about Maternal Labour Supply," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 136(674), pages 373-401.
    14. Bhat, Chandra R. & Mondal, Aupal & Asmussen, Katherine E. & Bhat, Aarti C., 2020. "A multiple discrete extreme value choice model with grouped consumption data and unobserved budgets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 196-222.
    15. Eric Delattre & Anne-Laure Samson, 2012. "Stratégies de localisation des médecins généralistes français : mécanismes économiques ou hédonistes ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 455(1), pages 115-142.
    16. Uddin, Md Azhar & Gao, Zhifeng & Farnsworth, Derek & Borisova, Tatiana & Bolques, Alejandro, 2022. "Mitigation of Hypothetical Bias in Estimating Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Best Management Practice Labels," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322431, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Petrolia, Daniel & Interis, Matthew & Hwang, Joonghyun, 2015. "Single-Choice, Repeated-Choice, and Best-Worst Elicitation Formats: Do Results Differ and by How Much?," Working Papers 212479, Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    18. Raj Chandra & GianCarlo Moschini & Gabriel E. Lade, 2025. "Geographical indications and welfare: Evidence from US wine demand," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(2), pages 670-695, March.
    19. Webb, Edward J.D. & Hess, Stephane, 2021. "Joint modelling of choice and rating data: Theory and examples," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    20. Iryna Y. Johnson, 2019. "Destinations of Admitted Out-of-State Students: A Case of One Institution," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(3), pages 315-337, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.