IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v136y2026i674p373-401..html

Beliefs about Maternal Labour Supply

Author

Listed:
  • Teodora Boneva
  • Marta Golin
  • Katja Kaufmann
  • Christopher Rauh

Abstract

We provide representative evidence on the perceived returns to maternal labour supply. A mother’s decision to work is perceived to have sizeable impacts on child skills, family outcomes, and the mother’s future labour market outcomes. Beliefs about the impact of additional household income can account for some, but not all, of the perceived positive effects. We further document labour supply intentions under different policy scenarios related to childcare availability and quality, two factors that are perceived as important. Finally, we show that perceived returns are predictive of labour supply intentions, over and above what can be explained by other factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Teodora Boneva & Marta Golin & Katja Kaufmann & Christopher Rauh, 2026. "Beliefs about Maternal Labour Supply," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 136(674), pages 373-401.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:136:y:2026:i:674:p:373-401.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueaf067
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:136:y:2026:i:674:p:373-401.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.