IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404449.html

Value of Improving Canal Conveyance Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Wei
  • Rouhi Rad, Mani
  • Bahrami, Shahin
  • Nayga, Rodolfo
  • Hrozencik, Aaron

Abstract

Surface water for irrigation is commonly delivered through canals and ditches, where conveyance losses can be substantial. Despite the policy relevance of improving the delivery infrastructure, there are no empirical estimates of the value of improvements in canal conveyance efficiency. In this paper, we estimate the willingness to pay for improving conveyance efficiency by exploiting the relationship between canal conveyance efficiency and producers’ investments in on-farm irrigation technology across two river basins in Colorado. We show that producers are more likely to invest in on-farm irrigation efficiency when canal conveyance efficiency is lower, consistent with private adaptation to losses in the delivery system. We use this relationship to recover are vealed preference value for improvements in canal conveyance efficiency. We find an average value of $2,898.71 per canal for a one percentage point increase in conveyance efficiency in the South Platte River Basin and $1,898.58 in the Rio Grande Basin. Using these estimates, we compare the benefits of canal lining with the costs and find that there are no canals in the study area for which benefits exceed costs. Taken together, these findings help explain the limited historical investment in canal conveyance improvements in our study area and shed light on opportunities for investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Wei & Rouhi Rad, Mani & Bahrami, Shahin & Nayga, Rodolfo & Hrozencik, Aaron, 2026. "Value of Improving Canal Conveyance Efficiency," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404449, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404449
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404449/files/177514_193883_115232_CE.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chieko Umetsu & Ujjayant Chakravorty, 2000. "Water conveyance costs and conjunctive use," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(7/8/9/10), pages 1020-1036, July.
    2. Pfeiffer, Lisa & Lin, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2014. "Does efficient irrigation technology lead to reduced groundwater extraction? Empirical evidence," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 189-208.
    3. David Zilberman & Jinhua Zhao & Amir Heiman, 2012. "Adoption Versus Adaptation, with Emphasis on Climate Change," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 4(1), pages 27-53, August.
    4. Hrozencik, Aaron & Perez-Quesada, Gabriela & Donahue, Hannah, 2025. "The development and current challenges of irrigated agriculture in the western U.S," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    5. Olivier Deschênes & Michael Greenstone & Joseph S. Shapiro, 2017. "Defensive Investments and the Demand for Air Quality: Evidence from the NOx Budget Program," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(10), pages 2958-2989, October.
    6. Sara Azargashb Lord & Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany & Abbas Roozbahani, 2021. "Minimization of Operational and Seepage Losses in Agricultural Water Distribution Systems Using the Ant Colony Optimization," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 827-846, February.
    7. Fisher-Vanden, Karen & Mansur, Erin T. & Wang, Qiong (Juliana), 2015. "Electricity shortages and firm productivity: Evidence from China's industrial firms," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 172-188.
    8. Francois, John Nana & Konte, Maty & Ruch, Franz Ulrich, 2026. "“Crowding in” effect of public investment on private investment revisited," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Hunt Allcott & Allan Collard-Wexler & Stephen D. O'Connell, 2016. "How Do Electricity Shortages Affect Industry? Evidence from India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(3), pages 587-624, March.
    10. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Wagner, Katherine R.H., 2023. "Crowding in with impure altruism: Theory and evidence from volunteerism in national parks," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    11. Kyle Wilson, 2025. "Does Public Competition Crowd Out Private Investment? Evidence from Municipal Provision of Internet Access," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 399-431, November.
    12. Blumberg, Joey & Goemans, Christopher & Manning, Dale, 2021. "Producer Beliefs and Conservation Decisions: The Impact of Perceived Water Security on Irrigation Technology Adoption," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 312796, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. John G. Fernald, 1999. "Roads to Prosperity? Assessing the Link between Public Capital and Productivity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(3), pages 619-638, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brown, David P. & Muehlenbachs, Lucija, 2024. "The value of electricity reliability: Evidence from battery adoption," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Perez Sebastian,Fidel & Steinbuks,Jevgenijs & Feres,Jose Gustavo & Trotter,Ian Michael, 2020. "Electricity Access and Structural Transformation : Evidence from Brazil's Electrification," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9182, The World Bank.
    3. Feng, Qu & Wu, Guiying Laura, 2018. "On the reverse causality between output and infrastructure: The case of China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 97-104.
    4. Xuehui Han & Jiaqi Su & Jang Ping Thia, 2021. "Impact of infrastructure investment on developed and developing economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 995-1024, November.
    5. Kennedy, Ryan & Mahajan, Aseem & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2019. "Quality of service predicts willingness to pay for household electricity connections in rural India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 319-326.
    6. Acar, Pinar & Berk, Istemi, 2022. "Power infrastructure quality and industrial performance: A panel data analysis on OECD manufacturing sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    7. Solomon P. Nathaniel & Festus V. Bekun, 2020. "Electricity Consumption, Urbanization and Economic Growth in Nigeria: New Insights from Combined Cointegration amidst Structural Breaks," Research Africa Network Working Papers 20/013, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    8. Yu, Mingwei & Xia, Fang & Su, Li & Song, Feng, 2025. "Climate change, electricity reliability, and energy structure: County-level evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PA).
    9. Zhang, Dengjun & Durmaz, Nazif & Kagochi, John M., 2025. "Energy outages, in-house power generators, and capacity utilization: The case of African manufacturing," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. repec:ces:ceswps:_10944 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Fried, Stephie & Lagakos, David, 2021. "Rural electrification, migration and structural transformation: Evidence from Ethiopia," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Ly, Alpha & Chakir, Raja & Creti, Anna, 2024. "Electrification or deforestation? Evidence from household practices in Côte d’Ivoire," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    13. Abiodun, Kehinde & Gilbert, Ben, 2022. "Does universal electrification shield firms from productivity loss?," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    14. Rabia Asif & Muhammad Fiaz & Zunaina Zulfiqar, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainable Energy on Liquidity and Financial Performance of the Textile Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    15. Lin, Yatang & Kassem, Dana, 2025. "The environmental cost of power outages: Evidence from Delhi," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Zhifeng Wang & Guiying Laura Wu & Qu Feng, 2020. "Productivity of core infrastructure investment in China: An input–output approach," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 3384-3406, December.
    17. Stephie Fried & David Lagakos, 2023. "Electricity and Firm Productivity: A General-Equilibrium Approach," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 67-103, October.
    18. Mertzanis, Charilaos & Garas, Samy & Abdel-Maksoud, Ahmed, 2020. "Integrity of financial information and firms' access to energy in developing countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Yu, Jian & Liu, Peng & Fu, Dahai & Shi, Xunpeng, 2023. "How do power shortages affect CO2 emission intensity? Firm-level evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    20. Taylor, Rebecca & Zilberman, David, 2015. "The Diffusion of Process Innovation: The Case of Drip Irrigation in California," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205320, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    21. Dang, Duc Anh & La, Hai Anh, 2019. "Does electricity reliability matter? Evidence from rural Viet Nam," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 399-409.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.