IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404366.html

Environmental and Economic Drivers of Greenhouse Tomato Competition in U.S. Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Vourazeris, Kelsey
  • Richards, Timothy
  • Schmitz, Troy

Abstract

This paper examines how trade policy and technological change have jointly shaped competition in the U.S. fresh tomato market. Since 1996, the U.S.–Mexico Tomato Suspension Agreements have imposed minimum reference prices on Mexican tomato exports, while Mexico has simultaneously expanded greenhouse production through sustained investment in protected agriculture. Using weekly product-level data from the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) Terminal Market and Movement reports from 1998 to 2025, we first document that suspension-agreement price floors bind frequently, with binding episodes occurring in approximately two out of every five weeks over the sample period. We show that these binding episodes disproportionately constrain lower-priced open-field products while greenhouse tomatoes, which command higher prices, are less frequently affected. This creates incentives for compositional shifts toward greenhouse production and higher-value export categories. To evaluate these mechanisms, we estimate a structural model of differentiated tomato demand that allows substitution across products defined by origin, production technology, variety, and organic status. The model incorporates heterogeneous preferences for greenhouse production and recovers implied marginal costs and markups under Bertrand competition. We then use the estimated framework to evaluate counterfactual policy scenarios involving tariffs on Mexican imports, reductions in marginal costs associated with Mexican greenhouse investment, and comparable subsidies for U.S. greenhouse producers. The preliminary results suggest that price-based trade protection primarily redistributes surplus, whereas technological change and greenhouse expansion have played a more important role in reshaping market structure, trade composition, and welfare outcomes in U.S. tomato markets. The paper contributes to the literature on non-tariff barriers by showing how differentiated price floors interact with production technology and quality differentiation in agricultural trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Vourazeris, Kelsey & Richards, Timothy & Schmitz, Troy, 2026. "Environmental and Economic Drivers of Greenhouse Tomato Competition in U.S. Markets," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404366, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404366
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404366/files/177472_194629_115232_Environmental_and_Economic_Drivers_of_Greenhouse_Tomato_Competition_in_US_Markets_AAEA_Submission.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kosse, Elijah & Devadoss, Stephen, 2016. "Welfare Analysis of the U.S.-Mexican Tomato Suspension Agreement," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(4), November.
    2. Baskins, Sarah & Bond, Jennifer K. & Minor, Travis, 2019. "Unpacking the Growth in Per Capita Availability of Fresh Market Tomatoes," Vegetables and Melons Outlook 341028, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Kosse, Elijah & Devadoss, Stephen, 2016. "Welfare Analysis of the U.S.-Mexican Tomato Suspension Agreement," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252726, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Hiau LooiKee & Alessandro Nicita & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2009. "Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(534), pages 172-199, January.
    5. Asci, Serhat & Seale, James L. & Onel, Gulcan & VanSickle, John J., 2016. "U.S. and Mexican Tomatoes: Perceptions and Implications of the Renegotiated Suspension Agreement," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(01), pages 1-23, January.
    6. John C. Beghin & Miet Maertens & Johan Swinnen, 2017. "Nontariff Measures and Standards in Trade and Global Value Chains," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 2, pages 13-38, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Maria Concetta Pedalà & Marzia Traverso & Simona Prestigiacomo & Antonio Covais & Giovanni Gugliuzza, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Tomato Cultivated in an Innovative Soilless System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2019. "The Effects of Non‐tariff Measures on Agri‐food Trade: A Review and Meta‐analysis of Empirical Evidence," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 595-617, September.
    9. Kosse, Elijah & Devadoss, Stephen, 2016. "Welfare Analysis Of The U.S.-Mexican Tomato Suspension Agreement," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 430-449, November.
    10. Cook, Roberta L. & Calvin, Linda, 2005. "Greenhouse Tomatoes Change the Dynamics of the North American Fresh Tomato Industry," Economic Research Report 7244, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Nevo, Aviv, 2001. "Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 307-342, March.
    12. Wu, Feng & Qushim, Berdikul & Calle, Marcelo & Guan, Zhengfei, . "Government Support in Mexican Agriculture," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(3).
    13. Valdez-Lafarga, Octavio & Schmitz, Troy G. & Englin, Jeffrey E., 2019. "The Role of Exchange Rates on Country-Differentiated Demand: The Case of United States Tomatoes," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 44(01), January.
    14. Christopher Conlon & Jeff Gortmaker, 2020. "Best practices for differentiated products demand estimation with PyBLP," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(4), pages 1108-1161, December.
    15. James Levinsohn & Steven Berry & Ariel Pakes, 1999. "Voluntary Export Restraints on Automobiles: Evaluating a Trade Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(3), pages 400-430, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takeshi Fukasawa, 2024. "Fast and simple inner-loop algorithms of static / dynamic BLP estimations," Papers 2404.04494, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    2. Mayer, Thierry & Head, Keith, 2021. "Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual methods in IO and Trade compared," CEPR Discussion Papers 16762, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Pesendorfer, Martin & Schiraldi, Pasquale & Silva-Junior, Daniel, 2023. "Omitted budget constraint bias in discrete-choice demand models," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & Lamonaca, Emilia, 2019. "On the impact of non-tariff measures on trade performances of the African agri-food sector," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 58(4), February.
    5. Pesendorfer, Martin & Schiraldi, Pasquale & Silva-Junior, Daniel, 2023. "Omitted budget constraint bias in discrete-choice demand models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117353, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Matthew Backus & Christopher Conlon & Michael Sinkinson, 2021. "Common Ownership and Competition in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry," NBER Working Papers 28350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Tovar, Jorge, 2012. "Consumers’ Welfare and Trade Liberalization: Evidence from the Car Industry in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 808-820.
    8. Giorgio Barba Navaretti & Giulia Felice & Emanuele Forlani & Paolo Garella, 2018. "Non-tariff measures and competitiveness," Development Working Papers 438, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano, revised 01 Feb 2023.
    9. Kirill Safonov, 2024. "Neural Network Approach to Demand Estimation and Dynamic Pricing in Retail," Papers 2412.00920, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    10. Coşar, A. Kerem & Grieco, Paul L.E. & Li, Shengyu & Tintelnot, Felix, 2018. "What drives home market advantage?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 135-150.
    11. Hammaad Adam & Pu He & Fanyin Zheng, 2024. "Machine Learning for Demand Estimation in Long Tail Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(8), pages 5040-5065, August.
    12. Haeck, Catherine & Lawson, Nicholas & Poirier, Krystel, 2022. "Estimating consumer preferences for different beverages using the BLP approach," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    13. Luis Armona & Greg Lewis & Georgios Zervas, 2025. "Learning Product Characteristics and Consumer Preferences from Search Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 838-855, July.
    14. Richard Schmalensee, 2012. "“On a Level with Dentists?” Reflections on the Evolution of Industrial Organization," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 41(3), pages 157-179, November.
    15. A. de Palma & K. Kilani, 2003. "Compensating Variation for Discrete Choice Models," Thema Working Papers 2003-02, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    16. Matthew Gentzkow, 2006. "Valuing New Goods in a Model with Complementarities: Online Newspapers," NBER Working Papers 12562, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Friberg, Richard & Ganslandt, Mattias, 2006. "An empirical assessment of the welfare effects of reciprocal dumping," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Wang, Ao, 2023. "Sieve BLP: A semi-nonparametric model of demand for differentiated products," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 325-351.
    19. Zhentong Lu & Kenichi Shimizu, 2025. "Estimating Discrete Choice Demand Models with Sparse Market-Product Shocks," Staff Working Papers 25-10, Bank of Canada.
    20. Christopher Conlon & Julie Holland Mortimer, 2021. "Empirical properties of diversion ratios," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 52(4), pages 693-726, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.