IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v90y2024i3p741-768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can geography explain Quebec's historical poverty?

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Geloso
  • Louis Rouanet

Abstract

From the 19th century to the 1940s, Quebec remained poorer and less economically developed than the rest of Canada in general, and than Ontario in particular. This placed Quebec at the bottom of North American rankings of living standards. One prominent hypothesis for the initiation of this gap is tied to disparities in agricultural land quality. We formally test this hypothesis using newly available data for the mid‐19th century and find it holds little explanatory power. We further argue that poor institutions in Quebec, notably seigneurial tenure, were at the root of the development gap and that the effect of land quality on living standards was institutionally contingent.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Geloso & Louis Rouanet, 2024. "Can geography explain Quebec's historical poverty?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 90(3), pages 741-768, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:90:y:2024:i:3:p:741-768
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.12671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12671
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.12671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:90:y:2024:i:3:p:741-768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.