IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v37y2017i11p2041-2052.html

Fish for Dinner? Balancing Risks, Benefits, and Values in Formulating Food Consumption Advice

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Rideout
  • Tom Kosatsky

Abstract

Many and complex factors underlie seemingly simple decisions about what to eat. This is particularly so for foods such as fish, which present consumers with both risks and benefits. Advice about what type of and how much fish to consume is abundant, but that advice is often confusing or contradictory, reflecting the differing mandates and orientations of those advising. We survey a range of issues that can and should be incorporated into dietary advice, and offer tools for health agencies tasked with providing it. We argue that risks and benefits should not be limited to direct physical health. Rather, socioeconomic and community factors, unintended or indirect effects, and nonhuman‐health outcomes such as animal welfare and planetary health should also be considered and weighed. We provide examples of existing fish consumption guidance to highlight the conflicting messages that emerge when different sources of advice with singular aims of avoiding risk, gaining nutritional benefit, or sustaining fish populations are juxtaposed. We then offer tools borrowed from health and other fields to guide health agencies toward developing more comprehensive advice and targeting that advice for specific populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Rideout & Tom Kosatsky, 2017. "Fish for Dinner? Balancing Risks, Benefits, and Values in Formulating Food Consumption Advice," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(11), pages 2041-2052, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:11:p:2041-2052
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12769
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shimshack, Jay P. & Ward, Michael B. & Beatty, Timothy K.M., 2007. "Mercury advisories: Information, education, and fish consumption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 158-179, March.
    2. Jeff Niederdeppe & Nancy A. Connelly & T. Bruce Labuer & Barbara A. Knuth, 2015. "Using Theory to Identify Beliefs Associated with Intentions to Follow Fish Consumption Advisories Among Anglers Living in the Great Lakes Region," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(11), pages 1996-2008, November.
    3. McDaniels, Timothy L. & Trousdale, William, 2005. "Resource compensation and negotiation support in an aboriginal context: Using community-based multi-attribute analysis to evaluate non-market losses," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 173-186, November.
    4. Meyer, I.H. & Schwartz, S., 2000. "Social issues as public health: Promise and peril," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(8), pages 1189-1191.
    5. Ralph L. Keeney, 1982. "Feature Article—Decision Analysis: An Overview," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 803-838, October.
    6. Shimshack, Jay P. & Ward, Michael B., 2010. "Mercury advisories and household health trade-offs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 674-685, September.
    7. Arnold, S.M. & Lynn, T.V. & Verbrugge, L.A. & Middaugh, J.P., 2005. "Human biomonitoring to optimize fish consumption advice: Reducing uncertainty when evaluating benefits and risks," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(3), pages 393-397.
    8. Helen May & Joanna Burger, 1996. "Fishing in a Polluted Estuary: Fishing Behavior, Fish Consumption, and Potential Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 459-471, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nydia‐Yuriana Zamora‐Arellano & Miguel Betancourt‐Lozano & César Ilizaliturri‐Hernández & Jaqueline García‐Hernández & Matín Jara‐Marini & Cristina Chávez‐Sánchez & Jorge Ricardo Ruelas‐Inzunza, 2018. "Mercury Levels and Risk Implications Through Fish Consumption on the Sinaloa Coasts (Gulf of California, Northwest Mexico)," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2646-2658, December.
    2. Paul E. Ouboter & Gwendolyn Landburg & Gaitrie U. Satnarain & Sheryl Y. Starke & Indra Nanden & Bridget Simon-Friedt & William B. Hawkins & Robert Taylor & Maureen Y. Lichtveld & Emily Harville & Jeff, 2018. "Mercury Levels in Women and Children from Interior Villages in Suriname, South America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carrieri, Vincenzo & Principe, Francesco, 2022. "WHO and for how long? An empirical analysis of the consumers’ response to red meat warning," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Alison L. Sexton Ward & Timothy K. M. Beatty, 2016. "Who Responds to Air Quality Alerts?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(2), pages 487-511, October.
    3. Anna Alberini, 2017. "Measuring the economic value of the effects of chemicals on ecological systems and human health," OECD Environment Working Papers 116, OECD Publishing.
    4. T. Bruce Lauber & Nancy A. Connelly & Jeff Niederdeppe & Barbara A. Knuth, 2018. "Effects of an Advisory Brochure on Fish Consumption of Urban Anglers in the Great Lakes Region," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(7), pages 1405-1421, July.
    5. Timothy K. M. Beatty & Jay P. Shimshack & Richard J. Volpe, 2019. "Disaster Preparedness and Disaster Response: Evidence from Sales of Emergency Supplies Before and After Hurricanes," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(4), pages 633-668.
    6. Nydia‐Yuriana Zamora‐Arellano & Miguel Betancourt‐Lozano & César Ilizaliturri‐Hernández & Jaqueline García‐Hernández & Matín Jara‐Marini & Cristina Chávez‐Sánchez & Jorge Ricardo Ruelas‐Inzunza, 2018. "Mercury Levels and Risk Implications Through Fish Consumption on the Sinaloa Coasts (Gulf of California, Northwest Mexico)," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2646-2658, December.
    7. Chen, Victor L. & Delmas, Magali A. & Locke, Stephen L. & Singh, Amarjeet, 2017. "Information strategies for energy conservation: A field experiment in India," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 215-227.
    8. Martin Browning & Lars Gårn Hansen & Sinne Smed, 2019. "Heterogeneous Consumer Reactions to Health News," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(2), pages 579-599.
    9. José G. Dórea, 2010. "Research into Mercury Exposure and Health Education in Subsistence Fish-Eating Communities of the Amazon Basin: Potential Effects on Public Health Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Hirotsugu Uchida & Cathy A. Roheim & Robert J. Johnston, 2017. "Balancing the Health Risks and Benefits of Seafood: How Does Available Guidance Affect Consumer Choices?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1056-1077.
    11. Carrieri, V.; & Principe, F.;, 2018. "WHO and for how long? An empirical analysis of the consumers’ response to red meat warning," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 18/08, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    12. Adam Dvir, 2022. "Is mass media an effective channel for conveying nutritional information? Welfare implications of the WHO classification of processed meats as carcinogenic on consumers in Israel," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2022 21, Stata Users Group.
    13. Chantal Toledo & Sofia Berto Villas-Boas, 2019. "Safe or Not? Consumer Responses to Recalls with Traceability," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 519-541, September.
    14. repec:ags:jrapmc:122316 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Hallstein, Eric & Villas-Boas, Sofia Berto, "undated". "Are Consumers Color Blind?: an empirical investigation of a traffic light advisory for sustainable seafood," CUDARE Working Papers 120535, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    16. Louie Rivers & Tamara Dempsey & Jade Mitchell & Carole Gibbs, 2015. "Environmental Regulation and Enforcement: Structures, Processes and the Use of Data for Fraud Detection," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-29, December.
    17. Mariano J. Rabassa & Mariana Conte Grand & Christian M. García-Witulski, 2021. "Heat warnings and avoidance behavior: evidence from a bike-sharing system," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(1), pages 1-28, January.
    18. Bojian Chen & Shiyuan Dong, 2022. "Mercury Contamination in Fish and Its Effects on the Health of Pregnant Women and Their Fetuses, and Guidance for Fish Consumption—A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Taillandier, F. & Sauce, G. & Bonetto, R., 2009. "Risk-based investment trade-off related to building facility management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 785-795.
    20. Mingcong, Chen & Qingshan, Ma & Qiqi, Sun, 2025. "The impact of food safety regulation on the health of middle-aged and older adults: Evidence from Chinese food safety pilot cities," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1182-1197.
    21. Bennear, Lori S. & Olmstead, Sheila M., 2008. "The impacts of the "right to know": Information disclosure and the violation of drinking water standards," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 117-130, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:11:p:2041-2052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.