IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/povpop/v10y2018i1p39-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Between a Rock and a Hard Place”: The Constraints of Welfare‐to‐Work Bureaucracies

Author

Listed:
  • Christi L. Gross
  • Jacob Church
  • Tiffany Taylor
  • Jackuelyn K. Towne‐Roese

Abstract

Using data drawn from telephone interviews with program managers in Ohio's welfare‐to‐work program, Ohio Works First (OWF; N = 69), we examine how managers deal with revisions to welfare‐to‐work program requirements. Specifically, we examine the tensions concerning expectations that managers will both police and help clients. Much like street‐level bureaucrats, managers not only face these tensions, but they also supervise caseworkers to ensure county compliance with government rules. Therefore, we also examine managers’ frustrations with state and federal governments, their clients, and the bureaucratic constraints associated with their positions. 通过对俄亥俄州“福利到工作”计划-俄亥俄州工作第一(Ohio Works First, OWF)的69名项目经理进行电话访问, 并使用得出的数据, 本文检测了项目经理如何修订“福利到工作”计划的相关要求。具体而言, 本文检验了项目经理被期待同时监管和帮助客户时的紧张关系。和街头官僚很相似的是, 经理不仅要面对这些紧张关系, 还要监管个案工作者, 以确保各县遵守政府规定。因此, 本文还检验了经理对州政府、联邦政府、客户, 以及与其职务相关的官僚限制感到懊恼的事务。 Utilizando datos de entrevistas telefónicas con gerentes del programa Ohio Works First (OWF; N = 69), examinamos cómo los gerentes lidian con las revisiones a los requisitos de los programas walfare‐to‐work. Específicamente, examinamos cómo las tensiones que tienen que ver con las expectativas de que los gerentes sean tanto policías como una ayuda para los clientes. Así como los burócratas de bajo nivel, los gerentes no solo se enfrentan a estas tensiones, también supervisan a los trabajadores de caso para asegurar su cumplimiento con las reglas del gobierno. Por ende, también examinamos las frustraciones de los gerentes con gobiernos estatales y federales, sus clientes y las limitaciones burocráticas asociadas con sus puestos.

Suggested Citation

  • Christi L. Gross & Jacob Church & Tiffany Taylor & Jackuelyn K. Towne‐Roese, 2018. "“Between a Rock and a Hard Place”: The Constraints of Welfare‐to‐Work Bureaucracies," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 39-56, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:39-56
    DOI: 10.1002/pop4.208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.208
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pop4.208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heckman, James J & Heinrich, Carolyn & Smith, Jeffrey, 1997. "Assessing the Performance of Performance Standards in Public Bureaucracies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 389-395, May.
    2. Lars Tummers & Victor Bekkers, 2014. "Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 527-547, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helen Simpson, 2009. "Productivity In Public Services," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 250-276, April.
    2. Pascal Courty & Gerald Marschke, 2003. "Making Government Accountable: Lessons from a Federal Job Training Program," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 03/083, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    3. Khalid Mehmood & Yaser Iftikhar & Aamir Suhail & Adil Zia, 2024. "How high-involvement work practices, public service motivation, and employees’ commitment influence employees' proactive work behavior: evidence from China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 55-81, February.
    4. Dumont, Etienne & Fortin, Bernard & Jacquemet, Nicolas & Shearer, Bruce, 2008. "Physicians' multitasking and incentives: Empirical evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1436-1450, December.
    5. Makris, Miltiadis, 2009. "Incentives for motivated agents under an administrative constraint," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 428-440, August.
    6. Mohammed Salah Hassan & Raja Noriza Raja Ariffin & Norma Mansor & Hussam Al Halbusi, 2021. "An Examination of Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Discretion and the Moderating Role of Supervisory Support: Evidence from the Field," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Shimaa Elkomy & Graham Cookson, 2020. "Performance Management Strategy: Waiting Time in the English National Health Services," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 95-112, March.
    8. Michael Kuhn & Luigi Siciliani, 2009. "Performance Indicators for Quality with Costly Falsification," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 1137-1154, December.
    9. Schmieder, Johannes F & Trenkle, Simon, 2020. "Disincentive effects of unemployment benefits and the role of caseworkers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Gauri, Varun, 2001. "Are incentives everything? payment mechanisms for health care providers in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2624, The World Bank.
    11. Cullen, Julie Berry, 2003. "The impact of fiscal incentives on student disability rates," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(7-8), pages 1557-1589, August.
    12. Christian Laux & Volker Laux, 2006. "Performance Measurement and Information Production," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 162(3), pages 412-423, September.
    13. Pirog, Maureen & Gerrish, Ed, 2015. "Impact of the Child Support Performance and Incentive Act on child support order establishment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 104-117.
    14. Carolyn J. Heinrich & Laurence E. Lynn, Jr., 1999. "Means and Ends: A Comparative Study of Empirical Methods For Investigating Governance and Performance," Working Papers 9915, Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.
    15. Besley, Timothy & Burchardi, Konrad B. & Bevan, Gwen, 2009. "Naming and shaming: the impacts of different regimes on hospital waiting times in England and Wales," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 33775, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Besley, Tim & Bevan, Gwyn & Burchardi, Konrad, 2009. "Naming & Shaming: The impacts of different regimes on hospital waiting times in England and Wales," CEPR Discussion Papers 7306, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Miller, Fiona A. & Lehoux, Pascale, 2020. "The innovation impacts of public procurement offices: The case of healthcare procurement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    18. Silva-Muller, Livio, 2022. "Payment for ecosystem services and the practices of environmental fieldworkers in policy implementation: The case of Bolsa Floresta in the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. Sechindra Vallury & Bryan Leonard, 2022. "Canals, climate, and corruption: The provisioning of public infrastructure under uncertainty," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 221-252, March.
    20. Brattström, Erik & Hellström, Tomas, 2019. "Street-level priority-setting: The role of discretion in implementation of research, development, and innovation priorities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 240-247.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:39-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-2858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.