IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intsec/v17y2022i1p108-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Persistent and transient efficiency of the chemical fertilizer firms in China: Does ownership matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoheng Zhang
  • Bingyu Huangfu
  • Shi Min

Abstract

The chemical fertilizer industry has made great contributions to China's food security. Existing studies mainly focus on evaluating fertilizer use efficiency at the farm level whereas little is known about the technical efficiency of Chinese firms producing fertilizer. Based on the Chinese Industrial Enterprise Database (CIED) and the Generalized True Random Effects model (GTRE), this paper estimates and decomposes the technical efficiency of Chinese fertilizer‐producing firms. Results show technical efficiency increased from 0.883 in 1998 to 0.930 in 2007, with an average of 0.898. The growth rate of persistent efficiency is lower than that of transient efficiency, implying structural problems exist in the Chinese fertilizer industry. Moreover, ownership type and firms' entry and exit are exogenous determinants of technical inefficiency. State‐owned firms perform much worse on technical efficiency. The entry of efficient firms and exit of inefficient firms, especially the exit of inefficient state‐owned firms, have improved the technical efficiency significantly.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoheng Zhang & Bingyu Huangfu & Shi Min, 2022. "Persistent and transient efficiency of the chemical fertilizer firms in China: Does ownership matter?," International Studies of Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 108-124, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:intsec:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:108-124
    DOI: 10.1002/ise3.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.6
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ise3.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intsec:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:108-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.