IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tuk/qipqip/v16y2012i27.html

Improvement in Product Development: Use of back-end data to support upstream efforts of Robust Design Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Vanajah Siva

Abstract

In the area of Robust Design Methodology (RDM) less is done on how to use and work with data from the back-end of the product development process to support upstream improvement. The purpose of this paper is to suggest RDM practices for the use of customer claims data in early design phases as a basis for improvements. The back-end data, when systematically analyzed and fed back into the product development process, aids in closing the product development loop from claims to improvement in the design phase. This is proposed through a flow of claims data analysis tied to an existing tool, namely Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). The systematic and integrated analysis of back-end data is suggested as an upstream effort of RDM to increase understanding of noise factors during product usage based on the feedback of claims data to FMEA and to address continuous improvement in product development.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanajah Siva, 2012. "Improvement in Product Development: Use of back-end data to support upstream efforts of Robust Design Methodology," Quality Innovation Prosperity, Technical University of Košice, Department of integrated management, vol. 16(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:tuk:qipqip:v:16:y:2012:i:2:7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.qip-journal.eu/index.php/QIP/article/download/65/50
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marlin U. Thomas & Sridevi S. Rao, 1999. "Warranty Economic Decision Models: A Summary and Some Suggested Directions for Future Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 807-820, December.
    2. Khalid S. Mekki, 2006. "Robust Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Designing for Six Sigma," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 292-304.
    3. Majeske, Karl D. & Lynch-Caris, Terri & Herrin, Gary, 1997. "Evaluating product and process design changes with warranty data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 79-89, June.
    4. Bharatendra K. Rai, 2009. "Strategies for feedback on reliability and robustness from automobile warranty data," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 276-290.
    5. Bersimis, Sotiris & Psarakis, Stelios & Panaretos, John, 2006. "Multivariate Statistical Process Control Charts: An Overview," MPRA Paper 6399, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Tari, Juan Jose & Sabater, Vicente, 2004. "Quality tools and techniques: Are they necessary for quality management?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 267-280, December.
    7. Gruner, Kjell E. & Homburg, Christian, 2000. "Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Gang & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 98-110.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Shaomin, 2013. "A review on coarse warranty data and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Zhou, Chongwen & Chinnam, Ratna Babu & Dalkiran, Evrim & Korostelev, Alexander, 2017. "Bayesian approach to hazard rate models for early detection of warranty and reliability problems using upstream supply chain information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 316-331.
    3. Bayo-Moriones, Alberto & Merino-Díaz-de-Cerio, Javier & Antonio Escamilla-de-León, Sergio & Mary Selvam, Rejina, 2011. "The impact of ISO 9000 and EFQM on the use of flexible work practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 33-42, March.
    4. Molly C. Klanderman & Kathryn B. Newhart & Tzahi Y. Cath & Amanda S. Hering, 2020. "Fault isolation for a complex decentralized waste water treatment facility," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 931-951, August.
    5. Marian Beise, 2004. "Lead Markets, Innovation Differentials and Growth," Discussion Paper Series 157, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    6. Maria Rosario Perello-Marín & Gabriela Ribes-Giner & Odette Pantoja Díaz, 2018. "Enhancing Education for Sustainable Development in Environmental University Programmes: A Co-Creation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Ehrenhard, Michel & Wijnhoven, Fons & van den Broek, Tijs & Zinck Stagno, Marc, 2017. "Unlocking how start-ups create business value with mobile applications: Development of an App-enabled Business Innovation Cycle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 26-36.
    8. L. G. Pee, 2016. "Customer co-creation in B2C e-commerce: does it lead to better new products?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 217-243, June.
    9. Linus Schiöler & Marianne Fris�n, 2012. "Multivariate outbreak detection," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 223-242, April.
    10. Mahdi Mokhtarzadeh & Jorge Rodríguez-Echeverría & Ivana Semanjski & Sidharta Gautama, 2025. "Hybrid intelligence failure analysis for industry 4.0: a literature review and future prospective," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2309-2334, April.
    11. Suherna & Weksi Budiaji, 2014. "The Impact of customers' relation quality and sensing on the marketing performance for micro industries development in Banten Province, Indonesia," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 147-151, June.
    12. Tarunija Chandra & Vibhuti Tripathi, 2023. "Antecedents and Mediators for Building and Integrated Research Framework towards Successful Brand Revitalisation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 133-163.
    13. Anna S. Cui & Fang Wu, 2016. "Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 516-538, July.
    14. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Wen-An Yang, 2016. "Simultaneous monitoring of mean vector and covariance matrix shifts in bivariate manufacturing processes using hybrid ensemble learning-based model," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 845-874, August.
    16. M.A. Wortman & Debra A. Elkins, 2005. "Stochastic modeling for computational warranty analysis," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 224-231, April.
    17. Chowdhury, Sanjib & Miles, Grant, 2006. "Customer-induced uncertainty in predicting organizational design: Empirical evidence challenging the service versus manufacturing dichotomy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 121-129, January.
    18. Meeta Dasgupta & Anupama Prashar, 2020. "Does Parental Co-creation Impacts Perceived Value? A Mixed-method Study in Indian Elementary Educational Innovations," Vision, , vol. 24(1), pages 90-100, March.
    19. SamatlI-Pa, Glay & Taner, Mehmet R., 2009. "The role of repair strategy in warranty cost minimization: An investigation via quasi-renewal processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 632-641, September.
    20. Alexandra Rese & Anke Kutschke & Daniel Baier, 2016. "Analyzing The Relative Influence Of Supply Side, Demand Side And Regulatory Factors On The Success Of Collaborative Energy Innovation Projects," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-43, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tuk:qipqip:v:16:y:2012:i:2:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Bober (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.