IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpdev/v3y2006i3-4p292-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Designing for Six Sigma

Author

Listed:
  • Khalid S. Mekki

Abstract

Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a methodology that has been used in most industries for many years. Typically, the Design FMEAs are developed early in the product development cycle, in conjunction with the product risk analysis, product architecture and product requirements. Robust Design FMEA, the subject of this paper, is an enhancement to the currently in use Design FMEA by anticipating safety and reliability failure modes through the use of a Parameter Diagram (P-Diagram). The Design FMEAs have gone through a metamorphosis of sorts in the last decade, as a focus on severity and occurrence has replaced Risk Priority Number- (RPN-) driven activities. In large part this is due to the measurement of risk outcomes, resulting from associated RPNs being misinterpreted. As so many practitioners of the Design FMEA believe that the RPN is the most important outcome. However, the Design FMEA methodology must consider taking actions as soon as it is practical.

Suggested Citation

  • Khalid S. Mekki, 2006. "Robust Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Designing for Six Sigma," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 292-304.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:3:y:2006:i:3/4:p:292-304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9895
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanajah Siva, 2012. "Improvement in Product Development: Use of back-end data to support upstream efforts of Robust Design Methodology," Quality Innovation Prosperity, Technical University of Košice, Department of integrated management, vol. 16(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:3:y:2006:i:3/4:p:292-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=36 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.