IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe

Listed author(s):
  • Andres Rodriguez-Pose
  • Riccardo regstdcenzi

Rodriguez-Pose A. and regstdcenzi R. Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies. Research on the impact of innovation on regional economic performance in Europe has fundamentally followed three approaches: (1) the analysis of the link between investment in research and development (R&D), patents, and economic growth; (2) the study of the existence and efficiency of regional innovation systems; and (3) the examination of the geographical diffusion of regional knowledge spillovers. These complementary approaches have, however, rarely been combined. Important operational and methodological barriers have thwarted any potential cross-fertilization. This paper tries to fill this gap in the literature by combining in one model R&D, spillovers, and innovation systems approaches. A multiple regression analysis is conducted for all regions of the group of 25 European Union countries (EU-25), including measures of R&D investment, proxies for regional innovation systems, and knowledge and socio-economic spillovers. This approach allows the discrimination between the influence of internal factors and external knowledge and institutional flows on regional economic growth. The empirical results highlight how the complex interaction between local and external research, on the one hand, with local and external socio-economic and institutional conditions, on the other, shapes the innovation capacity of every region. They also indicate the importance of proximity for the transmission of economically productive knowledge, as spillovers are affected by strong distance decay effects. [image omitted] Rodriguez-Pose A. et regstdcenzi R. R&D, retombees, systemes d'innovation, et la genese de la croissance regionale en Europe. Regional Studies. Les recherches sur l'impact de l'innovation sur les performances economiques regionales en Europe ont essentiellement suivi trois approches: (1) l'analyse du lien entre l'investissement dans la R&D, les brevets et la croissance economique; (2) l'etude de l'existence et de l'efficacite de systemes regionaux d'innovation; et (3) l'examen de la diffusion geographique des retombees regionales du savoir. Ces approches complementaires ont cependant ete rarement combinees. D'importants obstacles operationnels et methodologiques ont contrecarre toute fertilisation croisee potentielle. Dans cet article, nous essayons de combler cette lacune dans la litterature en combinant dans un modele unique les approches de type R&D, retombees et systeme d'innovation. Une analyse de regression multiple est menee pour toutes les regions de l'UE a 25, incluant les mesures pour l'investissement en R&D, les mandataires des systemes d'innovation regionaux, et les retombees socio-economiques et du savoir. Cette approche nous permet de faire la distinction entre l'influence des facteurs internes et des flux externes de savoir et institutionnels sur la croissance economique regionale. Les resultats empiriques soulignent combien les interactions complexes entre la recherche locale et la recherche exterieure, d'un cote, et les conditions socio-economiques et institutionnelles locales et exterieures, de l'autre, faconnent la capacite d'innovation de chaque region. Ces resultats indiquent egalement l'importance de la proximite dans la transmission du savoir economiquement productif, les retombees etant affectees par les forts effets de degradation qu'entraine la distance. Croissance economique Innovation R&D Savoir Retombees Systemes d'innovation Regions Union Europeenne Rodriguez-Pose A. und regstdcenzi R. F&E, Wissensubertragung, Innovationssysteme und die Entstehung von Regionalwachstum in Europa. Regional Studies. Bei der Erforschung der Auswirkung der regionalen Wirtschaftsleistung in Europa auf die Innovation wurden bisher in erster Linie drei Ansatze verfolgt: (1) die Analyse der Verknupfung zwischen Investitionen in F&E, Patente und Wirtschaftswachstum, (2) die Erforschung der Existenz und Effizienz von regionalen Innovationssystemen und (3) die Untersuchung der geografischen Diffusion von regionaler Wissensubertragung. Diese Ansatze erganzen einander, wurden jedoch bisher nur selten miteinander kombiniert. Eine potenzielle gegenseitige Befruchtung wurde durch wichtige operative und methodologische Hindernisse konterkariert. In diesem Beitrag versuchen wir diese Lucke in der Literatur zu schliessen, indem wir die Ansatze fur F&E, Wissensubertragung und Innovationssysteme in einem Modell kombinieren. Wir fuhren fur alle EU-25-Regionen eine multiple Regressionsanalyse durch, die Messungen der F&E-Investitionen, Vertreter fur regionale Innovationssysteme sowie Wissens- und soziooonomische Ubertragungen umfasst. Mit diesem Ansatz lasst sich zwischen dem Einfluss von internen Faktoren und externen Wissens- und Institutionsstromen auf das regionale Wirtschaftswachstum unterscheiden. Die empirischen Ergebnisse verdeutlichen, wie die komplexen Wechselwirkungen zwischen lokaler und externer Forschung einerseits und lokalen sowie externen soziookonomischen und institutionellen Bedingungen andererseits die Innovationskapazitat jeder Region pragen. Ebenso weisen sie auf die Bedeutung der Nahe fur die Ubertragung von wirtschaftlich produktivem Wissen hin, da die Wissensubertragung mit zunehmender Entfernung stark beeintrachtigt wird. Wirtschaftswachstum Innovation F&E Wissen Wissensubertragung Innovationssysteme Regionen Europaische Union Rodriguez-Pose A. y regstdcenzi R. I + D, 'spillovers', sistemas de innovacion y la genesis del crecimiento regional en Europa. Regional Studies. La investigacion sobre el impacto de la innovacion sobre el desempeno economico en Europa ha seguido fundamentalmente tres enfoques: (1) el analisis del vinculo entre la inversion en I + D, patentes y crecimiento economico; (2) el estudio de la existencia y eficacia de sistemas de innovacion regionales y (3) el examen de la difusion geografica del conocimiento (spillovers). A pesar de su complementariedad, estos enfoques apenas se han combinado. La presencia de barreras metodologicas y operacionales ha minado cualquier posibilidad de interaccion. En este articulo nuestra intencion es cubrir este hueco en la literatura, combinando en un modelo los enfoques basados I + D, spillovers y sistemas de innovacion. Esto se realiza mediante un analisis de regresion multiple que incluye variables de inversion en I + D, componentes de los sistemas de innovacion regional y spillovers de conocimiento y de caracter socioeconomico. Este enfoque nos permite discriminar entre la influencia de los factores internos y los flujos externos de conocimiento e institucionales sobre el crecimiento economico. Los resultados empiricos subrayan como la interaccion entre la investigacion local y la realizada en otros espacios, por un lado, con las condiciones socioeconomicas e institucionales tanto en el ambito local como en otras areas, por otro, influye en la capacidad innovativa de cada region. Los resultados tambien ponen de manifiesto la importancia de la cercania geografica en la transmision del conocimiento productivo, ya que la eficacia de los spillovers se ve fuertemente afectada por la distancia. Crecimiento economico Innovacion I + D Conocimiento Spillovers Sistemas de innovacion regiones Union Europea

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 42 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 51-67

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:42:y:2008:i:1:p:51-67
DOI: 10.1080/00343400701654186
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Jan Fagerberg & Bart Verspagen & Marjolein Caniëls, 1997. "Technology, Growth and Unemployment across European Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 457-466.
  2. Lydia Greunz, 2003. "Geographically and technologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 37(4), pages 657-680, December.
  3. Sylvie Charlot & Gilles Duranton, 2006. "Cities and Workplace Communication: Some Quantitative French Evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(8), pages 1365-1394, July.
  4. Jaffe, Adam B, 1986. "Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 984-1001, December.
  5. W. Rupert Maclaurin, 1953. "The Sequence from Invention to Innovation and Its Relation to Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 67(1), pages 97-111.
  6. Fagerberg, Jan, 1994. "Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 32(3), pages 1147-1175, September.
  7. Birgitte Gregersen & Bjorn Johnson, 1997. "Learning Economies, Innovation Systems and European Integration," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 479-490.
  8. James D. Adams, 2002. "Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 253-278, July.
  9. Rosina Moreno & Raffaele Paci & Stefano Usai, 2005. "Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(10), pages 1793-1812, October.
  10. Cooke, Philip & Gomez Uranga, Mikel & Etxebarria, Goio, 1997. "Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 475-491, December.
  11. Paul Cheshire, 2000. "Endogenous Processes in European Regional Growth: Convergence and Policy," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 455-479.
  12. Kurt Dopfer & John Foster & Jason Potts, 2004. "Micro-meso-macro," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 263-279, July.
  13. Breschi, Stefano & Lissoni, Francesco, 2001. "Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 975-1005, December.
  14. Audretsch, David B & Feldman, Maryann P, 1996. "R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 630-640, June.
  15. Riccardo Crescenzi & Andrés Rodriguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2007. "The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe-United States comparative analysis," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(6), pages 673-709, November.
  16. Anselin, Luc & Varga, Attila & Acs, Zoltan, 1997. "Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 422-448, November.
  17. Michael Storper & Anthony J. Venables, 2004. "Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 351-370, August.
  18. John Adams & Francesco Pigliaru (ed.), 1999. "Economic Growth and Change," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1359.
  19. Andres RodrIguez-Pose & Ugo Fratesi†, 2004. "Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 97-113.
  20. Allen Scott, 2006. "Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Industrial Development: Geography and the Creative Field Revisited," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-24, February.
  21. Beñat Bilbao-Osorio & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2004. "From R&D to Innovation and Economic Growth in the EU," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 434-455.
  22. Jung Won Sonn & Michael Storper, 2008. "The increasing importance of geographical proximity in knowledge production: an analysis of US patent citations, 1975 – 1997," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 40(5), pages 1020-1039, May.
  23. Bottazzi, Laura & Peri, Giovanni, 2003. "Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 687-710, August.
  24. Acs, Zoltan J & Audretsch, David B & Feldman, Maryann P, 1992. "Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(1), pages 363-367, March.
  25. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2002. "The determinants of national innovative capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 899-933, August.
  26. Edward E Leamer & Michael Storper, 2001. "The Economic Geography of the Internet Age," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 32(4), pages 641-665, December.
  27. Iammarino, Simona & McCann, Philip, 2006. "The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1018-1036, September.
  28. Thomas Doring & Jan Schnellenbach, 2006. "What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 375-395.
  29. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters,in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  30. Riccardo Crescenzi, 2005. "Innovation and Regional Growth in the Enlarged Europe: The Role of Local Innovative Capabilities, Peripherality, and Education," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 471-507.
  31. Rosenberg,Nathan, 1994. "Exploring the Black Box," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521459556, December.
  32. Giovanni Dosi & Christopher Freeman & Richard Nelson & Gerarld Silverberg & Luc Soete (ed.), 1988. "Technical Change and Economic Theory," LEM Book Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, number dosietal-1988, June.
  33. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
  34. Kevin Morgan, 2004. "The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 3-21, January.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:42:y:2008:i:1:p:51-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.