IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Why is job security lower for Maori and pacific island workers? The role of employer-provided training

Listed author(s):
  • John Gibson
  • Carolyn Watane

Maori and Pacific Island workers are more likely than other workers to transit from employment to unemployment whereas exit rates from unemployment are relatively less dispersed across ethnic groups. Hence, lack of job security appears to raise the unemployment rate for Maori and Pacific Islanders. This paper uses unit record data to examine one source of lower job security, which is that Maori and Pacific Island workers may receive less employer-provided training. The results suggest that training reduces employer-induced separations, but even controlling for training, and for age, years of schooling, gender, marital status and industry, there is an identifiable effect of Maori and especially Pacific Islanders experiencing higher involuntary job losses. Moreover, once the available characteristics of workers and their jobs are controlled for, Maori have the same incidence of training and may receive even more intensive training than do Pakeha workers. In contrast, Pacific Island and Other ethnic group workers have a significantly lower level of employer-provided training. Thus, job training does not explain all of the ethnic differences in involuntary unemployment rates and some ethnic minorities appear to receive a lower level of job training which cannot be explained by their known social characteristics and their occupation and industry. Of course there may be social characteristics for which we have not been able to control, which further explain part of the differences in experiences between the ethnic groups.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal New Zealand Economic Papers.

Volume (Year): 35 (2001)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 1-24

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:35:y:2001:i:1:p:1-24
DOI: 10.1080/00779950109544330
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:35:y:2001:i:1:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.