IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Capabilities, reproductive health and well-being

Listed author(s):
  • Jocelyn Dejong
Registered author(s):

    Lack of reproductive health (or the health consequences of sexuality and reproduction) constitutes a significant deficiency in well-being in developing countries, yet the field is often marginalised within development studies. This paper explores whether applying Amartya Sen's capabilities framework to reproductive health may provide one means of bridging this gap. It asks whether it has advantages over prevailing approaches based on disability adjusted life years, which are disease-focused, or reproductive rights, which are often perceived as being too individualistic. The paper draws on analysis of three reproductive health problems, namely obstetric fistulae, maternal mortality and female genital mutilation, that occur disproportionately in developing countries. It argues that the capabilities approach offers an opportunity to address the social bases of health (including deprivation and poverty) and one class of societal claims to social justice. However, there are barriers to fostering the kind of cross-disciplinarity needed to undertake such research, which would combine the more technical orientation of economics and epidemiology on the one hand, with the more qualitative social sciences on the other. Even where such cross-disciplinarity can be achieved, however, there are both informational constraints and methodological challenges to illuminate health capabilities - as opposed to functionings as measured in quantitative surveys - in such a sensitive field.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Journal of Development Studies.

    Volume (Year): 42 (2006)
    Issue (Month): 7 ()
    Pages: 1158-1179

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:42:y:2006:i:7:p:1158-1179
    DOI: 10.1080/00220380600884092
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Amartya Sen, 2002. "Why health equity?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(8), pages 659-666.
    2. Anand, Sudhir & Hanson, Kara, 1997. "Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 685-702, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:42:y:2006:i:7:p:1158-1179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.