IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v35y1992i8p967-977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal health and the measurement trap

Author

Listed:
  • Graham, Wendy J.
  • Campbell, Oona M. R.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the contribution of measurement-related factors to the neglect of maternal health in resource allocation for programmes and in public health research. As the recent interest in maternal health has now progressed beyond the need for information primarily for the purpose of advocacy, measurement-related factors have emerged as powerful constraints on programme action. Three outstanding needs for information can be identified: first, to establish the levels and trends of specific maternal health outcomes; secondly, to identify the characteristics and determinants of health outcomes; and thirdly, to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of programmes designed to influence health outcomes. In order to meet these needs, the emphasis placed on operational research by the current major initiatives in maternal health must be complemented by an equivalent emphasis on methodological studies. The call for improved information by international and national agencies should be made in unison with the call for action. Inadequate information is a reality that has to be faced throughout the world, but particularly in developing countries. The quality, quantity and scope of health-related data are the elements of this inadequacy and may be discussed in terms of four factors: the indicators, the data sources, the measurement techniques, and the conceptual framework. In this paper, the neglect of maternal health and the lack of information are shown to be self-reinforcing and constitute a measurement trap sprung by these four factors. Dismantling this trap has revealed a weak conceptual framework to lie at the very centre. Maternal health has tended to be conceptualized as a discrete, negative state, characterized by physical rather than social or mental manifestations, and by a narrow time-perspective focusing on pregnancy, delivery and the puerperium. The need to broaden this perspective and to develop equally broad operational definitions represent important steps forward that must be taken.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham, Wendy J. & Campbell, Oona M. R., 1992. "Maternal health and the measurement trap," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 967-977, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:8:p:967-977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90236-J
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suh, Siri, 2020. "What post-abortion care indicators don't measure: Global abortion politics and obstetric practice in Senegal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    2. Storeng, Katerini Tagmatarchi & Murray, Susan F. & Akoum, Mélanie S. & Ouattara, Fatoumata & Filippi, Véronique, 2010. "Beyond body counts: A qualitative study of lives and loss in Burkina Faso after 'near-miss' obstetric complications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1749-1756, November.
    3. Jocelyn Dejong, 2006. "Capabilities, reproductive health and well-being," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 1158-1179.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:8:p:967-977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.