IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i8d10.1007_s11192-025-05387-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who leads matters: diversity and external collaboration in Brazilian scientific teams

Author

Listed:
  • Tulio Chiarini

    (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Ipea)

  • Emerson Gomes Santos

    (Economia e Negócios, e Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, da Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Eppen/Unifesp)

  • Larissa Pereira

    (Advocacia-Geral da União, AGU)

  • Marcia Siqueira Rapini

    (da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Cedeplar/UFMG)

  • Leandro Alves Silva

    (da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Cedeplar/UFMG)

Abstract

This paper investigates the diversity within research teams, with a particular focus on the individual characteristics of team leaders. To achieve this, we test four hypotheses using data on 46,158 leaders from 31,869 research teams in Brazil, which together accounted for 51,275 interactions with external partners. First, we investigate whether shared leadership in scientific teams fosters greater collaboration with external partners compared to teams with a single leader. Second, we evaluate whether the presence of female leaders in scientific teams influences the extent of external collaborations. Third, we analyze whether non-White leaders affect the level of cooperation with external partners. Finally, we explore whether diverse shared leadership, incorporating variation in both race/ethnicity and gender, impacts the number of external partnerships and collaborations. We use data from the Directory of Research Groups (Diretório dos Grupos de Pesquisa—DGP) to test these hypotheses and employ Poisson and Negative Binomial regression techniques. Our findings reveal that shared leadership within scientific teams has a positive influence on the number of collaborations with external partners. However, the presence of female leaders—whether in single or shared leadership configurations (e.g., female–female, male–female, or female–male leadership)—is associated with a significant reduction in external collaborations. Additionally, teams led by non-White researchers—either as sole leaders or in shared leadership structures—are less likely to collaborate externally compared to teams led by White researchers. Finally, leadership groups composed exclusively of ‘Shared White Leadership,’ ‘Shared Male Leadership,’ or ‘Shared Female White Leadership’ do not exhibit statistically significant differences from the reference group, ‘Heterogeneous Shared Leadership,’ in terms of external collaborations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tulio Chiarini & Emerson Gomes Santos & Larissa Pereira & Marcia Siqueira Rapini & Leandro Alves Silva, 2025. "Who leads matters: diversity and external collaboration in Brazilian scientific teams," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4749-4772, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05387-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05387-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05387-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05387-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J15 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05387-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.