IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rvmgts/v19y2025i2d10.1007_s11846-024-00767-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing professional microfinance associations: the Tanzanian case through the prism of institutional design

Author

Listed:
  • Tristan Caballero-Montes

    (Université de Mons (UMONS)
    Centre for European Research in Microfinance (CERMi)
    National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS))

  • Cécile Godfroid

    (Université de Mons (UMONS)
    Centre for European Research in Microfinance (CERMi))

Abstract

Given recent criticisms, orienting the practices of microfinance institutions towards the achievement of their social missions is critical. Going beyond the dichotomous “government-or-market” view, we investigate a fundamental but barely studied actor: professional microfinance associations (MFAs). Despite their central position and the roles that they aim to endorse in the field, MFAs face organizational and governance obstacles limiting their impact, including free riding among member organizations. Our study explores the root causes of free riding within microfinance associations. Thanks to a three-month stay at the Tanzanian MFA, TAMFI, we carried out an immersive fieldwork, which enabled us to collect diverse types of qualitative data, in an inductive perspective: observations during multiple events related to TAMFI’s activities and initiatives, multiple semi-directed interviews with key, local, stakeholders, and reviews of specific documents and reports available at the MFA. Discovering the organizational issues faced by the MFA, we used Elinor Ostrom’s institutional design principles for governing collective action as theoretical lenses, which helped explain some of the mechanisms preventing the MFA to play its desired roles. Among root causes of free riding, we identified trade-offs related to membership heterogeneity, inappropriate distribution of inputs and outputs among member organizations, the lack of monitoring and sanctioning capacity of the associations, and a weak integration into regulatory processes, especially. With a theoretical contribution, we also suggest interdependencies among these institutional issues, which should be considered when governing microfinance associations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tristan Caballero-Montes & Cécile Godfroid, 2025. "Governing professional microfinance associations: the Tanzanian case through the prism of institutional design," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 623-648, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:19:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11846-024-00767-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11846-024-00767-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-024-00767-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11846-024-00767-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Héritier, Adrienne & Eckert, Sandra, 2009. "Self-Regulation by Associations: Collective Action Problems in European Environmental Regulation," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Cécile Lapenu & Zana Konini & Charlot Razakaharivelo, 2009. "Évaluation De La Performance Sociale : Les Enjeux D'Une Finance Responsable," Revue Tiers-Monde, Armand Colin, vol. 0(1), pages 37-54.
    3. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils, 2005. "Organizations and meta-organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 429-449, December.
    4. W. Nathan Green, 2020. "Regulating Over‐indebtedness: Local State Power in Cambodia's Microfinance Market," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(6), pages 1429-1453, November.
    5. MAREK HUDON & BENJAMIN HUYBRECHTS & Anaïs PÉRILLEUX & Marthe NYSSENS, 2017. "Understanding Cooperative Finance As A New Common," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 155-177, June.
    6. Michael J. Lenox, 2006. "The Role of Private Decentralized Institutions in Sustaining Industry Self-Regulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 677-690, December.
    7. Philip Jones, 2004. "‘All for One and One for All’: Transactions Cost and Collective Action," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(3), pages 450-468, October.
    8. Joana Silva Afonso & Solène Morvant‐Roux & Isabelle Guérin & Davide Forcella, 2017. "Doing Good by Doing Well? Microfinance, Self‐Regulation and Borrowers' Over‐indebtedness in the Dominican Republic," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(7), pages 919-935, October.
    9. Laura Albareda & Alejo Jose G. Sison, 2020. "Commons Organizing: Embedding Common Good and Institutions for Collective Action. Insights from Ethics and Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 727-743, November.
    10. R. Quentin Grafton, 2000. "Governance of the Commons: A Role for the State?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 76(4), pages 504-517.
    11. Dima Jamali & Asem M. Safieddine & Myriam Rabbath, 2008. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 443-459, September.
    12. Héritier Adrienne & Eckert Sandra, 2009. "Self-Regulation by Associations: Collective Action Problems in European Environmental Regulation," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Tristan Caballero-Montes, 2023. "Integrating market conditions into regulatory decisions on microfinance interest rates: does competition matter?," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 201-232, June.
    14. John Elkington, 2006. "Governance for Sustainability," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(6), pages 522-529, November.
    15. Neema Mori & Roy Mersland, 2014. "Boards in microfinance institutions: how do stakeholders matter?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(1), pages 285-313, February.
    16. Philip Jones, 2004. "'All for One and One for All': Transactions Cost and Collective Action," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52, pages 450-468, October.
    17. Sanjay Kumar Singh & Sanjaya S. Gaur, 2020. "Corporate growth, sustainability and business ethics in twenty-first century," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 303-305, June.
    18. Kilbane, Sally Conway & Beck, John H, 1990. "Professional Associations and the Free Rider Problem: The Case of Optometry," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 181-187, May.
    19. Ranjay Gulati & Phanish Puranam & Michael Tushman, 2012. "Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 571-586, June.
    20. Frances Bowen, 2019. "Marking Their Own Homework: The Pragmatic and Moral Legitimacy of Industry Self-Regulation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 257-272, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Carlos Marques, 2017. "Industry Business Associations: Self-Interested or Socially Conscious?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 733-751, July.
    2. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    3. Francesca Bernini & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 405-444, June.
    4. Héloïse Berkowitz & Nils Brunsson & Michael Grothe-Hammer & Mikaela Sundberg & Bertrand Valiorgue, 2022. "Meta-Organizations: A Clarification and a Way Forward," Post-Print hal-03685386, HAL.
    5. Francesco Perrini & Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro, 2011. "Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 59-76, March.
    6. Banerjee, Anup & Carlsson-Wall, Martin & Nordqvist, Mattias, 2024. "Hybrid board governance: Exploring the challenges in implementing social impact measurements," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    7. Rasha Ahmed, 2012. "Promoting energy-efficient products: voluntary or regulatory approaches?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 14(3), pages 303-321, July.
    8. Andreas P. Kyriacou, 2010. "Intrinsic Motivation and the Logic of Collective Action: The Impact of Selective Incentives," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 823-839, April.
    9. Gangi, Francesco & Meles, Antonio & Monferrà, Stefano & Mustilli, Mario, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility help the survivorship of SMEs and large firms?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    10. Shiu, Jing-Ming & Dallas, Mark P. & Huang, Hui-Hsuan, 2023. "A friend of a friend? Informal authority, social capital, and networks in telecommunications standard-setting organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Taewoo Roh & Shufeng Simon Xiao & Byung Il Park, 2023. "Effects of open innovation on eco-innovation in meta-organizations: evidence from Korean SMEs," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 2004-2028, November.
    12. Chee Kwong Lau, 2019. "The economic consequences of business sustainability initiatives," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 937-970, December.
    13. Ahmad Nawaz & Sana Iqbal & Sadaf Ehsan, 2018. "Does Social Performance Drive Corporate Governance Mechanism In Case of Asian MFIs? An Issue of Endogeneity," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 988-1012, August.
    14. Dionisia Tzavara and Adrienne Héritier, 2011. "Quality and Environmental Regulation: Verifying Compliance along the Supply Chain," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 16, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    15. Ntim, Collins G., 2016. "Corporate governance, corporate health accounting, and firm value: The case of HIV/AIDS disclosures in Sub-Saharan Africa," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 155-216.
    16. Eunice S. Khoo & Youngdeok Lim & Louise Y. Lu & Gary S. Monroe, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility performance and the reputational incentives of independent directors," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5-6), pages 841-881, May.
    17. Eugenio Zubeltzu‐Jaka & Igor Álvarez‐Etxeberria & Eduardo Ortas, 2020. "The effect of the size of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A meta‐analytic approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1361-1374, May.
    18. Eunice S. Khoo & Li Chen & Gary S. Monroe, 2023. "Shareholder election of CSR committee members and its effects on CSR performance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3-4), pages 716-763, March.
    19. Pierre Garaudel, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Post-Print halshs-02474817, HAL.
    20. Kwame Ohene Djan & Roy Mersland, 2022. "Are NGOs and cooperatives similar or different? A global survey using microfinance data," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(2), pages 641-683, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:19:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11846-024-00767-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.