IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v57y2023i6d10.1007_s11135-023-01621-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-criteria approach for ranking Italian high schools

Author

Listed:
  • Paola Mancini

    (University of Sannio)

  • Gabriella Marcarelli

    (University of Sannio)

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision making is a useful tool for economic applications, especially in the last decade. We investigate and compare the performance of Italian public high schools. We consider three outputs provided by average students’ school and academic performance, and school characteristics. Our sample includes 263 high schools (HS) in all Italian Regions, grouped into 6 types and 3 geographic areas. Employing specific weights for the outputs, we apply PROMETHEE to derive the ranking of different types of schools by geographic area. Then we apply ELECTRE III to the same problem and compare the results with those obtained using PROMETHEE. Our results show that: (a) there are significant differences between HS according to school and academic performance; (b) Classic and Scientific Lyceums are the best types of school regardless of geographic area; (c) by simultaneously considering type of school and geographic area, southern HS seem to have better performances than northern ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Paola Mancini & Gabriella Marcarelli, 2023. "A multi-criteria approach for ranking Italian high schools," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 5533-5549, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01621-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01621-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01621-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-023-01621-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01621-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.