IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v16y2023i4d10.1007_s12063-023-00404-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain responses to global disruptions and its ripple effects: an institutional complexity perspective

Author

Listed:
  • David M. Herold

    (Queensland University of Technology)

  • Łukasz Marzantowicz

    (SGH Warsaw School of Economics)

Abstract

The recent disruption of global supply chains and its ripple effects has led to multiple new, often conflicting, demands from governments, businesses, and society for more resilient supply chains, thereby elevating the debate about supply chains to a broader institutional level. As a response, this article aims to broaden how supply chain scholars view decision-making for supply chain resilience from an institutional perspective – in particular, using the construct of institutional complexity. We argue that the inherent complexity in supply chains, consisting of multiple organizations and multiple institutional environments, represents a different playing field and results in different responses, in particular when confronted with disruptions. We provide a systematic and structured understanding of how the interactions of institutional logics, influenced by field-levels structures and processes, impact global supply chains and its constituents. Using existing literature on institutional complexity and works on the effects of institutional logics, we present not only field-level structures and attributes influencing and shaping institutional logics in the supply chain, but also discuss and contrast existing theories and concepts by highlighting the differences between supply chain and organizational responses both on an institutional and an overarching operational level.

Suggested Citation

  • David M. Herold & Łukasz Marzantowicz, 2023. "Supply chain responses to global disruptions and its ripple effects: an institutional complexity perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 2213-2224, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00404-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-023-00404-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-023-00404-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-023-00404-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Dolgui & Dmitry Ivanov & Boris Sokolov, 2018. "Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 414-430, January.
    2. Rico Ihle & Ofir D. Rubin & Ziv Bar-Nahum & Roel Jongeneel, 2020. "Imperfect food markets in times of crisis: economic consequences of supply chain disruptions and fragmentation for local market power and urban vulnerability," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(4), pages 727-734, August.
    3. Tobias Bier & Anne Lange & Christoph H. Glock, 2020. "Methods for mitigating disruptions in complex supply chain structures: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(6), pages 1835-1856, March.
    4. Utz Schäffer & Erik Strauss & Christina Zecher, 2015. "The role of management control systems in situations of institutional complexity," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 395-424, October.
    5. Kevin P. Scheibe & Jennifer Blackhurst, 2018. "Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 43-59, January.
    6. Massari, Giovanni Francesco & Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2021. "Investigating the effect of horizontal coopetition on supply chain resilience in complex and turbulent environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    7. Hayagreeva Rao & Philippe Monin & Rodolphe Durand, 2003. "Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy," Post-Print hal-00480858, HAL.
    8. Gyan Prakash, 2022. "Resilience in food processing supply chain networks: empirical evidence from the Indian dairy operations," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(4), pages 578-603, April.
    9. Roger Strange & John Humphrey, 2019. "What lies between market and hierarchy? Insights from internalization theory and global value chain theory," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1401-1413, October.
    10. Andreas Wieland, 2021. "Dancing the Supply Chain: Toward Transformative Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(1), pages 58-73, January.
    11. John P. Saldanha & John E. Mello & A. Michael Knemeyer & T.A.S. Vijayaraghavan, 2015. "Implementing Supply Chain Technologies in Emerging Markets: An Institutional Theory Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 51(1), pages 5-26, January.
    12. Marcus Brandenburg & Tobias Rebs, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain management: a modeling perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 213-252, June.
    13. Barbara B. Flynn & Xenophon Koufteros & Guanyi Lu, 2016. "On Theory in Supply Chain Uncertainty and its Implications for Supply Chain Integration," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 3-27, July.
    14. Qian Yang & Ruoqi Geng & Taiwen Feng, 2020. "Does the configuration of macro‐ and micro‐institutional environments affect the effectiveness of green supply chain integration?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1695-1713, May.
    15. Zeki Simsek, 2009. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 597-624, June.
    16. Julie Battilana & Bernard Leca & Eva Boxenbaum, 2009. "How actors change institutions : Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship," Post-Print hal-00576509, HAL.
    17. Glover, J.L. & Champion, D. & Daniels, K.J. & Dainty, A.J.D., 2014. "An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 102-111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdulaziz T. Almaktoom, 2025. "Resilience modeling of mobile service for quality assurance," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 182-194, March.
    2. Jan Stentoft & Ole Stegmann Mikkelsen & Kent Adsbøll Wickstrøm, 2025. "Reshoring manufacturing: the influence of industry 4.0, Covid-19, and made-in effects," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 353-372, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    2. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui, 2022. "Stress testing supply chains and creating viable ecosystems," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 475-486, June.
    3. Giulio Marcucci & Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica & Giovanni Mazzuto & Maurizio Bevilacqua, 2024. "Analysis of ripple effect and its impact on supply chain resilience: a general framework and a case study on agri-food supply chain during the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 175-200, March.
    4. Jayanti, Rama K. & Raghunath, S., 2018. "Institutional entrepreneur strategies in emerging economies: Creating market exclusivity for the rising affluent," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 87-98.
    5. Jessica L. Darby & David J. Ketchen & Brent D. Williams & Travis Tokar, 2020. "The Implications of Firm‐Specific Policy Risk, Policy Uncertainty, and Industry Factors for Inventory: A Resource Dependence Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 3-24, October.
    6. Victoria Johnson & Walter W. Powell, 2015. "Poisedness and Propagation: Organizational Emergence and the Transformation of Civic Order in 19th-Century New York City," NBER Working Papers 21011, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Y. Sekou Bermiss & Benjamin L. Hallen & Rory McDonald & Emily C. Pahnke, 2017. "Entrepreneurial beacons: The Yale endowment, run‐ups, and the growth of venture capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 545-565, March.
    8. Chen, Yucheng & Xia, Yongxiang & Hua, Zhen, 2025. "Risk propagation in supply-chain network considering node heterogeneity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 657(C).
    9. Jain, Sanjay, 2020. "Fumbling to the future? Socio-technical regime change in the recorded music industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Yi Zheng & Li Liu & Victor Shi & Wenxing Huang & Jianxiu Liao, 2022. "A Resilience Analysis of a Medical Mask Supply Chain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simulation Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Nadia Zahoor & Jie Wu & Huda Khan & Zaheer Khan, 2023. "De-globalization, International Trade Protectionism, and the Reconfigurations of Global Value Chains," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(5), pages 823-859, October.
    12. Maxim Voronov & Mary Ann Glynn & Klaus Weber, 2022. "Under the Radar: Institutional Drift and Non‐Strategic Institutional Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 819-842, May.
    13. Maureen S. Golan & Laura H. Jernegan & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 222-243, June.
    14. Chatterjee, Ira & Cornelissen, Joep & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "Social entrepreneurship and values work: The role of practices in shaping values and negotiating change," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    15. Christopher W. Craighead & David J. Ketchen Jr. & Matthew T. Jenkins & Mary C. Holcomb, 2017. "A Supply Chain Perspective on Strategic Foothold Moves in Emerging Markets," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(4), pages 3-12, October.
    16. Wei Xu & Dong-Ping Song, 2022. "Integrated optimisation for production capacity, raw material ordering and production planning under time and quantity uncertainties based on two case studies," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2343-2371, July.
    17. Alikhani, Reza & Ranjbar, Amirhossein & Jamali, Amir & Torabi, S. Ali & Zobel, Christopher W., 2023. "Towards increasing synergistic effects of resilience strategies in supply chain network design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Canan Kocabasoglu‐Hillmer & Sinéad Roden & Evelyne Vanpoucke & Byung‐Gak Son & Marianne W. Lewis, 2023. "Radical innovations as supply chain disruptions? A paradox between change and stability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(3), pages 3-19, July.
    19. Jasper Hotho & Dana Minbaeva & Maral Muratbekova-Touron & Larissa Rabbiosi, 2020. "Coping with Favoritism in Recruitment and Selection: A Communal Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 659-679, September.
    20. Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: a Bayesian network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 581-607, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00404-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.