IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joevec/v36y2026i1d10.1007_s00191-025-00919-4.html

Hybrid organizations beyond externalities and organizational duality: The case of Chinese “People’s Mediation Committees”

Author

Listed:
  • Yanlong Zhang

    (Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Rural Development Institute)

  • Wolfram Elsner

    (University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics)

Abstract

The increasing complexity of real-world business environments, problem-solving, and governance has outgrown traditional organizational theories, which are based solely on negative externalities and the market-hierarchy duality. We add a social-network dimension to “market” and “hierarchy” and develop an extended conception of a hybrid organizational space. We fill this two-dimensional space, the “organizational triangle”, with a more specific hybrid organizational structure. We not only consider this structure a combination of the three allocation mechanisms but also integrate multiple and heterogeneous entities into that triangle, i.e., firms, local public-private networks, and state agencies (e.g., courts). This entails multiple and diverse interrelations, objectives, values, and behaviors. In joint conflict-solving, entities will have to adapt to each other, and often to adopt principles of other entities, implementing the hybridity of the system within their own organization, decision-making, and learning of new emerging social institutions. This is investigated in case studies of Chinese non-governmental local “People’s Mediation Committees”. These function as hubs that, with their conflict-settling arrangements, link the agents in new ways and through new informal institutions to be learned. They also use specific explicit and implicit contracts, complementing hierarchical, market, and network contracting. Such more comprehensive hybridity may help advance organizational theories in economics and management studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanlong Zhang & Wolfram Elsner, 2026. "Hybrid organizations beyond externalities and organizational duality: The case of Chinese “People’s Mediation Committees”," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joevec:v:36:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s00191-025-00919-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00191-025-00919-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00191-025-00919-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00191-025-00919-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melissa E. Graebner & Koen H. Heimeriks & Quy Nguyen Huy & Eero Vaara, 2017. "The Process of Postmerger Integration : A Review and Agenda for Future Research," Post-Print hal-02276670, HAL.
    2. Elinor Ostrom & Vincent Ostrom, 2004. "The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 105-147, January.
    3. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    4. Filipe Santos, 2012. "A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 335-351, December.
    5. Fiona Lee & Amy C. Edmondson & Stefan Thomke & Monica Worline, 2004. "The Mixed Effects of Inconsistency on Experimentation in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 310-326, June.
    6. Bylund, Per L., 2021. "The Firm versus the Market: Dehomogenizing the Transaction Cost Theories of Coase and Williamson," Strategic Management Review, now publishers, vol. 2(1), pages 79-118, February.
    7. Lewis, Paul & Aligica, Paul Dragos, 2024. "The Ostroms on self-governance: the importance of cybernetics," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20, pages 1-1, January.
    8. repec:hal:journl:hal-02311973 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Richard O. Zerbe & Howard E. McCurdy, 1999. "The failure of market failure," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 558-578.
    10. Pollack, Mark A., 2003. "The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199251179.
    11. Zhang, Yanlong & Elsner, Wolfram, 2017. "A social-leverage mechanism on the Silk Road: the private emergence of institutions in central Asia, from the 7th to the 9th century," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 379-400, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:483-506 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Wallace E. Oates & Paul R. Portney & Wallace E. Oates & Paul R. Portney, 2004. "The Political Economy of Environmental Policy," Chapters, in: Environmental Policy and Fiscal Federalism, chapter 1, pages 3-30, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Jiao Luo & Aseem Kaul, 2019. "Private action in public interest: The comparative governance of social issues," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 476-502, April.
    4. Yanlong Zhang, 2021. "The Demsetz’s Evolutionary Theory of Property Rights as Applied to Rural Land of China: A Supplement," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Kubickova Marketa, 2016. "The Role of Government in Tourism: Linking Competitiveness, Freedom, and Developing Economies," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 73-92, December.
    6. Benno Torgler, 2021. "The Power of Public Choice in Law and Economics," CREMA Working Paper Series 2021-04, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    7. Elodie Bertrand, 2019. "Much ado about nothing? The controversy over the validity of the Coase theorem," Post-Print hal-03479468, HAL.
    8. Silvia Sacchetti & Carlo Borzaga, 2021. "The foundations of the “public organisation”: governance failure and the problem of external effects," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 731-758, September.
    9. Jeffery S. McMullen & Benjamin J. Warnick, 2016. "Should We Require Every New Venture to Be a Hybrid Organization?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 630-662, June.
    10. Grafström, Jonas, 2025. "Vertical industrial policy: principles, practice and potential," Ratio Working Papers 384, The Ratio Institute.
    11. Massimo Cervesato, 2026. "Conceptualizing Common Property Rights: An Institutionalist Reading of Elinor Ostrom," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 26005, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    12. Thomas Doleys, 2009. "Incomplete Contracting, Commission Discretion and the Origins of EU Merger Control," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 483-506, June.
    13. Benno Torgler, 2022. "The power of public choice in law and economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1410-1453, December.
    14. Cary Coglianese & Shana M. Starobin, 2020. "Social Science and the Analysis of Environmental Policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(5), pages 578-604, September.
    15. Raul V. Fabella & Vigile Marie Fabella, 2016. "RE-thinking market failure in the light of the imperfect state," Philippine Review of Economics, University of the Philippines School of Economics and Philippine Economic Society, vol. 53(2), pages 28-46, December.
    16. Massimo Cervesato, 2025. "When Elinor Ostrom Meets Herbert A. Simon: The Sciences of the Artificial as a Methodological Guide "To Deal with Complexity"," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 25007, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    17. J.A. den Hertog, 2010. "Review of economic theories of regulation," Working Papers 10-18, Utrecht School of Economics.
    18. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    19. Giuseppe Attanasi & Ylenia Curci & Patrick Llerena & Maria del Pino Ramos-Sosa & Adriana Carolina Pinate & Giulia Urso, 2019. "Looking at Creativity from East to West: Risk Taking and Intrinsic Motivation in Socially and Culturally Diverse Countries," Working Papers of BETA 2019-38, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    20. Qiuyue Xia & Lu Li & Jie Dong & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    21. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joevec:v:36:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s00191-025-00919-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.