IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i4d10.1007_s13132-024-01793-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering High-Quality Corporate Development through ESG-Driven Technological Innovation: A Moderated Mediation Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Peiyou Yu

    (Qingdao University of Science and Technology)

  • Zhiji Zuo

    (Qingdao University of Science and Technology)

  • Da Lian

    (Qingdao University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

In the pursuit of corporate high-quality development (HQD), this research delves into the intricate relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, technological innovation, and Chinese A-share-listed companies from 2011 to 2020. We present empirical evidence of a significant positive correlation between ESG performance and HQD, enriching the landscape of sustainable business practices. Importantly, this study introduces technological innovation as a pivotal mediator in this association, shedding light on its critical role in translating ESG endeavors into superior outcomes. The theoretical implications of this research are twofold. Firstly, it solidifies the empirical basis for the positive impact of ESG performance on HQD, advancing our understanding of this critical relationship. Also, by identifying technological innovation as a mediator, this study offers a novel perspective, revealing the intricate mechanisms through which ESG practices shape high-quality corporate development. This discovery expands theoretical frameworks in sustainability and innovation management, enabling a deeper understanding of these dynamics. From a managerial perspective, this study underscores the strategic importance of integrating ESG initiatives into core business strategies. Aligning mission statements, corporate governance, and daily operations with ESG principles enhances reputation and stakeholder engagement and drives high-quality development through responsible decision-making. Moreover, transparency in ESG reporting, using frameworks like GRI and SASB, fosters trust and accountability, promoting sustainable growth. Our research also emphasizes the necessity of technology investment to facilitate high-quality development. Organizations should prioritize innovation, research, and development, as technology streamlines production, differentiates products, and reduces costs, ultimately enhancing overall performance. In terms of policy recommendations, we urge policymakers to incentivize ESG practices and technology innovation through regulations, tax incentives, and support for collaborative ecosystems. These initiatives can align economic development with sustainability goals, creating a conducive environment for responsible business practices and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Peiyou Yu & Zhiji Zuo & Da Lian, 2024. "Fostering High-Quality Corporate Development through ESG-Driven Technological Innovation: A Moderated Mediation Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17598-17629, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-024-01793-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-01793-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-024-01793-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-024-01793-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo Duque-Grisales & Javier Aguilera-Caracuel, 2021. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 315-334, January.
    2. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Can digital finance empowerment reduce extreme ESG hypocrisy resistance to improve green innovation?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Diane Denis, 2019. "The Case for Maximizing Long‐Run Shareholder Value," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 31(3), pages 81-89, September.
    4. Wang, Yuandi & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Roijakkers, Nadine, 2012. "Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation — A theoretical analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 419-428.
    5. Yuming Zhai & Zhenghuan Cai & Han Lin & Ming Yuan & Ye Mao & Mingchuan Yu, 2022. "Does better environmental, social, and governance induce better corporate green innovation: The mediating role of financing constraints," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1513-1526, September.
    6. Na Xu & Wendong Lv & Junli Wang, 2023. "The Impact of Board Governance on Firm Risk among China’s A-Share Market-Listed Companies from 2010 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Louis Maximilian Ronalter & Merce Bernardo & Javier Manuel Romaní, 2023. "Quality and environmental management systems as business tools to enhance ESG performance: a cross-regional empirical study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9067-9109, September.
    8. Jingwei Zhang, 2023. "Institutional investors site visits, CSR performance, and large shareholder’s expropriation," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 2267223-226, December.
    9. Tan, Yafei & Zhu, Zhaohui, 2022. "The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Chao Hung Wang & Wei‐Jr Juo, 2021. "An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3241-3254, November.
    11. Tuan-Hock Ng & Chun-Teck Lye & Kar-Hoong Chan & Ying-Zhee Lim & Ying-San Lim, 2020. "Sustainability in Asia: The Roles of Financial Development in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 17-44, July.
    12. Jochen Wirtz & Valarie Zeithaml, 2018. "Cost-effective service excellence," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 59-80, January.
    13. Heinonen, Kristina & Strandvik, Tore, 2018. "Reflections on customers’ primary role in markets," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-11.
    14. Hayelom Abrha Meressa, 2020. "Growth of micro and small scale enterprises and its driving factors: empirical evidence from entrepreneurs in emerging region of Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Mariusz Karwowski & Monika Raulinajtys‐Grzybek, 2021. "The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1270-1284, July.
    16. Steve Clarke & Todd Rogers, 2023. "China Market Environment," Springer Books, in: Steven J. Clarke (ed.), Contemporary Strategic Chinese American Business Negotiations and Market Entry, pages 195-230, Springer.
    17. Zahra, Shaker A. & Covin, Jeffrey G., 1995. "Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 43-58, January.
    18. Koellinger, Philipp, 2008. "The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance--Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1317-1328, September.
    19. Jiang, Yihuo & Ni, Hongliang & Ni, Yihan & Guo, Xiaomei, 2023. "Assessing environmental, social, and governance performance and natural resource management policies in China's dual carbon era for a green economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    20. Zhu, Qinghua & Liu, Junjun & Lai, Kee-hung, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility practices and performance improvement among Chinese national state-owned enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P3), pages 417-426.
    21. Shaikh, Ibrahim & Randhawa, Krithika, 2022. "Managing the risks and motivations of technology managers in open innovation: Bringing stakeholder-centric corporate governance into focus," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    22. Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2015. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7), pages 1053-1081, July.
    23. Yilmaz Guney & Elvis Hernandez-Perdomo & Claudio M. Rocco, 2020. "Does relative strength in corporate governance improve corporate performance? Empirical evidence using MCDA approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(10), pages 1593-1618, October.
    24. Eliwa, Yasser & Aboud, Ahmed & Saleh, Ahmed, 2021. "ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    25. Feng, Suling & Zhang, Rong & Li, Guoxiang, 2022. "Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-83.
    26. Kanagaretnam, Kiridaran & Lobo, Gerald J. & Whalen, Dennis J., 2007. "Does good corporate governance reduce information asymmetry around quarterly earnings announcements?," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 497-522.
    27. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1368-1375, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Costantiello, Alberto & Drago, Carlo & Arnone, Massimo & Leogrande, Angelo, 2024. "Regional Research Intensity and ESG Indicators in Italy: Insights from Panel Data Models and Machine Learning," MPRA Paper 124185, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Yang & Jinmian Han, 2023. "Digital transformation, financing constraints, and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3189-3202, November.
    2. Marie, Mohamed & Qi, Baolei & Elgammal, Mohammed & Elnahass, Marwa, 2024. "A more sustainable future: Can politically connected CEOs spur the nexus between ESG performance and firm financial performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Yang, Yang & Jiang, Yan, 2023. "Buyer-supplier CSR alignment and firm performance: A contingency theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Wang, Zhen & Tang, Pei, 2024. "Substantive digital innovation or symbolic digital innovation: Which type of digital innovation is more conducive to corporate ESG performance?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 1212-1228.
    5. Heira Georgina Valdez-Bocanegra & Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán & Carmen Castrejón-Mata, 2020. "The Entrepreneurial Orientation and its Impact on Competitiveness and Growth: Empirical Evidence in the State of Aguascalientes in Mexico," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 1-6.
    6. Hao, Xiaoli & Sun, Qingyu & Li, Ke & Li, Peilun & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "Does environmental decentralisation improve ESG performance? Evidence from listed companies in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Xu, Yong & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Jian & Xie, Peijun, 2023. "Clarifying the dispute of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from green technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Zhao, Shikuan & Abbassi, Wajih & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Zhang, Han, 2024. "How do government R&D subsidies affect corporate green innovation choices? Perspectives from strategic and substantive innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1378-1396.
    9. Ren, Xiaohang & Zeng, Gudian & Zhao, Yang, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Du, Lixia & Geng, Baiyang, 2024. "Financial technology and financing constraints," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Wang, Kai & Li, Tingting & San, Ziyao & Gao, Hao, 2023. "How does corporate ESG performance affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Chao Li & Mian Wu & Wenli Huang, 2023. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Enterprise Dynamic Financial Behavior: Evidence from Panel Vector Autoregression," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(2), pages 281-295, January.
    13. Dingzu Zhang & Luqi Liu, 2022. "Does ESG Performance Enhance Financial Flexibility? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq & Huma Sarwar & Junaid Aftab & Simona Franzoni & Ali Raza, 2024. "Accomplishing sustainable performance through leaders' competencies, green entrepreneurial orientation, and innovation in an emerging economy: Moderating role of institutional support," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1515-1532, February.
    15. Zhang, Jiawei & Li, Yuan & Xu, Hanwen & Ding, Yi, 2023. "Can ESG ratings mitigate managerial myopia? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Qu, Shawn, 2024. "Costs may be a blessing in disguise: Litigation risk and greenwashing," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    17. Ye, Yongwei & Li, Chaoqun & Li, Xiaofan & Tao, Yunqing & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The role of tax enforcement on green innovation: Evidence from the consolidation of state and local tax bureau (CSLTB)," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 221-232.
    18. An, Hui & Ran, Chenyang & Gao, Ya, 2025. "Does ESG information disclosure increase firm value? The mediation role of financing constraints in China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    19. Jie Jiang & Qihang Zhang, 2023. "Boundary spanning strategy and tacit knowledge recombination: Analysis of joint‐patent networks of patent‐intensive firms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3585-3603, September.
    20. Yavuz GÜL & Ceren ALTUNTAŞ, 2024. "Do ESG Ratings Affect Stock Prices? The Case of Developed and Emerging Stock Markets," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 32(60).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-024-01793-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.