IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infott/v20y2018i1d10.1007_s40558-018-0113-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding European tourists’ use of e-tourism platforms. Analysis of networks

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana David-Negre

    (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria - University Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development (TIDES))

  • Arminda Almedida-Santana

    (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria - University Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development (TIDES))

  • Juan M. Hernández

    (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria - University Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development (TIDES))

  • Sergio Moreno-Gil

    (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria - University Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development (TIDES))

Abstract

This paper analyses the use of the main e-tourism platforms by European tourists. A computer-aided Web interview (CAWI) was used to conduct the research in 19 European countries: Germany, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Spain, Finland, France, Holland, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, Luxemburg, Czech Republic, and the United Kingdom. The final sample consisted of 13,243 tourists. Through the methodology of Social Network Analysis (SNA), the study focuses on detecting key network players (social media, OTAs, etc.) in the e-tourism ecosystem. The network analysis reveals the structural characteristics of the network of networks in the European e-tourism ecosystem: number of platforms (473), centrality degree and betweenness, and the specific characteristics of the networks by country. The results show an e-tourism network of platforms following a pattern known as core-periphery. Four platforms show a predominant role: Facebook, TripAdvisor, Google, and Booking. These ‘big four’ ego-networks are graphically represented to better understand the e-tourism network. The results also show that different networks are formed by country according to the use of e-tourism platforms. This study helps understand in a novel way the behaviour of European tourists when using e-tourism platforms to choose their travel destination. The results obtained are useful for companies and Destination Marketing Organizations (DMOs), understanding how e-tourism platforms are connected in order to design their segmentation and promotion strategy through e-tourism platforms in the European market.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana David-Negre & Arminda Almedida-Santana & Juan M. Hernández & Sergio Moreno-Gil, 2018. "Understanding European tourists’ use of e-tourism platforms. Analysis of networks," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 131-152, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40558-018-0113-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40558-018-0113-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40558-018-0113-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40558-018-0113-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard J. Jansen & Mimi Zhang & Kate Sobel & Abdur Chowdury, 2009. "Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(11), pages 2169-2188, November.
    2. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    3. Koo, Bonwoo & Mantin, Benny & O'Connor, Peter, 2011. "Online distribution of airline tickets: Should airlines adopt a single or a multi-channel approach?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 69-74.
    4. D. König Michael & Stefano Battiston, 2009. "From Graph Theory to Models of Economic Networks. A Tutorial," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Ahmad K. Naimzada & Silvana Stefani & Anna Torriero (ed.), Networks, Topology and Dynamics, pages 23-63, Springer.
    5. Baggio, Rodolfo, 2007. "The web graph of a tourism system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 379(2), pages 727-734.
    6. Verhoef, Peter C. & Kannan, P.K. & Inman, J. Jeffrey, 2015. "From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 174-181.
    7. Suzanne Amaro & Paulo Duarte, 2017. "Social media use for travel purposes: a cross cultural comparison between Portugal and the UK," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 161-181, June.
    8. Scott Neslin & Kinshuk Jerath & Anand Bodapati & Eric Bradlow & John Deighton & Sonja Gensler & Leonard Lee & Elisa Montaguti & Rahul Telang & Raj Venkatesan & Peter Verhoef & Z. Zhang, 2014. "The interrelationships between brand and channel choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 319-330, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deukhee Park & Sunmi Yun, 2023. "Comparing Tourism Activity Patterns Influenced by a Tourism Information Source: A Case of the Gyeonggi Province, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Marcello Mariani, 2020. "Web 2.0 and Destination Marketing: Current Trends and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Gelashvili, Vera & Martínez-Navalón, Juan Gabriel & DeMatos, Nelson & de Brito Correia, Marisol, 2024. "Technological transformation: The importance of E-WOM and perceived privacy in the context of opinion platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Alharmoodi, Ahmed Abdulla & Khan, Mehmood & Mertzanis, Charilaos & Gupta, Shivam & Mikalef, Patrick & Parida, Vinit, 2024. "Co-creation and critical factors for the development of an efficient public e-tourism system," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Giorgos Stamatelatos & George Drosatos & Sotirios Gyftopoulos & Helen Briola & Pavlos S. Efraimidis, 2021. "Point-of-interest lists and their potential in recommendation systems," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 209-239, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shu-Hsun Ho & Yu-Ling Lin & Robert Carlson Patrick, 2015. "Participant Motivations In A Social Media Community Page," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(4), pages 67-75.
    2. Lena Steinhoff & Denni Arli & Scott Weaven & Irina V. Kozlenkova, 2019. "Online relationship marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 369-393, May.
    3. Aladwani, Adel M., 2015. "Facilitators, characteristics, and impacts of Twitter use: Theoretical analysis and empirical illustration," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 15-25.
    4. Nguyen, Anh Thi Van & McClelland, Robert & Thuan, Nguyen Hoang, 2022. "Exploring customer experience during channel switching in omnichannel retailing context: A qualitative assessment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Hausmann, Andrea & Pöllmann, Lorenz, 2014. "Nutzer und Nutzung der Social Media-Profile von Theatern – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung auf Facebook," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 37(1-2), pages 73-87.
    6. Schneider, Patricia J. & Zielke, Stephan, 2020. "Searching offline and buying online – An analysis of showrooming forms and segments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. Hana Kim & Daeho Lee & Min Ho Ryu, 2018. "An Optimal Strategic Business Model for Small Businesses Using Online Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Marta Frasquet-Deltoro & Alejandro Molla-Descals & Maria-Jose Miquel-Romero, 2021. "Omnichannel retailer brand experience: conceptualisation and proposal of a comprehensive scale," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 388-401, July.
    9. Rutsaert, Pieter & Pieniak, Zuzanna & Regan, Áine & McConnon, Áine & Kuttschreuter, Margôt & Lores, Mònica & Lozano, Natàlia & Guzzon, Antonella & Santare, Dace & Verbeke, Wim, 2014. "Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 84-93.
    10. Lei, Lijun (Gillian) & Li, Yutao & Luo, Yan, 2019. "Production and dissemination of corporate information in social media: A review," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 29-43.
    11. Sesma Julio & Husted Bryan & Banks Jerry, 2014. "La medición del desempeño social empresarial a través de las redes sociales," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 59(2), pages 121-143, abril-jun.
    12. Paniagua, Jordi & Sapena, Juan, 2014. "Business performance and social media: Love or hate?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 719-728.
    13. Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Indulska, Marta & Steen, John & Verreynne, Martie-Louise, 2020. "Towards a framework for innovation in retailing through social media," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. João M. Lopes & Ana Sousa & Eva Calçada & José Oliveira, 2022. "A citation and co-citation bibliometric analysis of omnichannel marketing research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 1017-1050, December.
    15. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    16. Aleksandar Bradic, 2012. "The Role of Social Feedback in Financing of Technology Ventures," Papers 1301.2196, arXiv.org.
    17. Lashgari, Maryam, 2014. "Social Media Technology Deployment in B2B: A Case Study," INDEK Working Paper Series 2014/9, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management.
    18. Moro, Sérgio & Rita, Paulo & Vala, Bernardo, 2016. "Predicting social media performance metrics and evaluation of the impact on brand building: A data mining approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3341-3351.
    19. Charitha Harshani Perera & Rajkishore Nayak & Long Thang Van Nguyen, 2019. "Role of social word-of-mouth on emotional brand attachment and brand choice intention: A study on private educational institutes in Vietnam," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 8611115, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    20. Suddaby, Roy & Saxton, Gregory D. & Gunz, Sally, 2015. "Twittering change: The institutional work of domain change in accounting expertise," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 52-68.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40558-018-0113-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.