Some flaws in the doctrine of classical liberalism: Reviewing Charles Murray’sWhat it means to be a libertarian: A personal interpretation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.
Other versions of this item:
- Robert Prasch, 2000. "Some flaws in the doctrine of classical liberalism: Reviewing Charles Murray’sWhat it means to be a libertarian: A personal interpretation," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 17-29, January.
References listed on IDEAS
- Prasch, Robert E., 1997. "The Overburdened Consumer: The Economics of Technological Change in the Service Sector," Vassar College Department of Economics Working Paper Series 39, Vassar College Department of Economics.
- Levy, Frank & Murnane, Richard J, 1992. "U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 1333-1381, September.
- Piet-Hein van Eeghen, 1997. "The Capitalist Case Against the Corporation," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 85-113.
More about this item
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fosoec:v:30:y:2000:i:1:p:17-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .