IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v30y2013i3p443-455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer attitudes to different pig production systems: a study from mainland China

Author

Listed:
  • Marcia Barcellos
  • Klaus Grunert
  • Yanfeng Zhou
  • Wim Verbeke
  • F. Perez-Cueto
  • Athanasios Krystallis

Abstract

In many countries consumers have shown an increasing interest to the way in which food products are being produced. This study investigates Chinese consumers’ attitudes towards different pig production systems by means of a conjoint analysis. While there has been a range of studies on Western consumers’ attitudes to various forms of food production, little is known about the level of Chinese consumers’ attitudes. A cross-sectional survey was carried out with 472 participants in 6 Chinese cities. Results indicate that Chinese consumers prefer industrial pig production systems, where traditional pig breeds are raised, over large-scale and small family farms. Farms with maximum attention to food safety, which furthermore can provide lean meat with consistent quality, are also preferred. Imported pig breeds and tasty but variable meat were rejected. A 3-cluster solution found that consumers from cluster 1 focus almost exclusively on the food safety aspect (food safety focused). Consumers from cluster 2 (indifferent) show weak overall attitudes to pig production systems in general. Cluster 3 (industrial production oriented) stands out by being very positive about industrial, large-size farms and consistent quality. From a Chinese consumer’s perspective, the industrial approach seems to represent values such as achievement and evolution, as well as quality and safety, since pig production is moving away from low-cost, low-quality, and low-safety family-scale systems. A complex set of rural and environmental development, quality aspects, and food safety measures are challenges that must be met by the stakeholders of pig production systems in China. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Marcia Barcellos & Klaus Grunert & Yanfeng Zhou & Wim Verbeke & F. Perez-Cueto & Athanasios Krystallis, 2013. "Consumer attitudes to different pig production systems: a study from mainland China," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(3), pages 443-455, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:30:y:2013:i:3:p:443-455
    DOI: 10.1007/s10460-012-9416-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10460-012-9416-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10460-012-9416-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bennett, Merrill K., 1941. "Wheat in National Diets," Wheat Studies, Stanford University, Food Research Institute, vol. 18(02), pages 1-44, October.
    2. Zanoli, Raffaele & Naspetti, Simona, 2002. "Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food. A means-end approach," MPRA Paper 32712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Keiko Tanaka, 2008. "Seven samurai to protect “our” food: the reform of the food safety regulatory system in Japan after the BSE crisis of 2001," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(4), pages 567-580, December.
    4. Harrison, R. Wes & Ozayan, Aylin & Meyers, Samuel P., 1998. "A Conjoint Analysis Of New Food Products Processed From Underutilized Small Crawfish," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Katie Abrams & Courtney Meyers & Tracy Irani, 2010. "Naturally confused: consumers’ perceptions of all-natural and organic pork products," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(3), pages 365-374, September.
    6. Waldron, Scott & Brown, Colin & Longworth, John, 2010. "A critique of high-value supply chains as a means of modernising agriculture in China: The case of the beef industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 479-487, October.
    7. Stewart Lockie, 2009. "Responsibility and agency within alternative food networks: assembling the “citizen consumer”," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(3), pages 193-201, September.
    8. Klaus G. Grunert, 2005. "Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(3), pages 369-391, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salnikova, Ekaterina & Grunert, Klaus G., 2020. "The role of consumption orientation in consumer food preferences in emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 147-159.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaviglio, Anna & Demartini, Eugenio & Pirani, Alberto & Marescotti, Maria Elena & Bertocchi, Mattia, 2015. "National Brands versus Private Labels versus Niche Products: a graphical representation of consumers' perception," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202731, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Anna Gaviglio & Mattia Bertocchi & Maria Elena Marescotti & Eugenio Demartini & Alberto Pirani, 2016. "The social pillar of sustainability: a quantitative approach at the farm level," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Iliriana Miftari & Rainer Haas & Oliver Meixner & Drini Imami & Ekrem Gjokaj, 2022. "Factors Influencing Consumer Attitudes towards Organic Food Products in a Transition Economy—Insights from Kosovo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Agnès François-Lecompte & Morgane Innocent & Dominique Kréziak & Isabelle Prim-Allaz, 2020. "Confinement et comportements alimentaires : Quelles évolutions en matière d'alimentation durable ?," Post-Print hal-03197914, HAL.
    5. Fabrice Larceneux & Florence Benoît-Moreau & Valérie Renaudin, 2012. "Why Might Organic Labels Fail to Influence Consumer Choices? Marginal Labelling and Brand Equity Effects," Post-Print hal-00656485, HAL.
    6. Rodolfo Bernabéu & Margarita Brugarolas & Laura Martínez-Carrasco & Roberto Nieto-Villegas & Adrián Rabadán, 2023. "The Price of Organic Foods as a Limiting Factor of the European Green Deal: The Case of Tomatoes in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Fabrice Larceneux & Florence Benoit-Moreau & Valérie Renaudin, 2012. "Why Might Organic Labels Fail to Influence Consumer Choices? Marginal Labelling and Brand Equity Effects," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 85-104, March.
    8. Caracciolo, Francesco & Cembalo, Luigi & Cicia, Giovanni & Del Giudice, Teresa & Grunert, Klaus G. & Krystallis, Athanasios, 2011. "Food safety and quality, strategic levers for European products in emerging markets: the case of China," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114321, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Ki-Hueng Kim & Kwan-Ryul Lee, 2019. "What Are South Korean Consumers’ Concerns When Buying Eco-Friendly Agricultural Products?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Agnès François-Lecompte & Morgane Innocent & Dominique Kreziak & Isabelle Prim-Allaz, 2020. "Confinement and food-related behaviors: What are the changes in sustainable food consumption? [Confinement et comportements alimentaires : Quelles évolutions en matière d’alimentation durable ?]," Post-Print hal-03123334, HAL.
    11. Ramo Barrena & Mercedes Sánchez, 2010. "Differences in Consumer Abstraction Levels as a Function of Risk Perception," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 34-59, February.
    12. Evrim ERDOĞAN YAZAR & Murat BURUCUOĞLU, 2019. "Consumer Attitude towards Organic Foods: A Multigroup Analysis across Genders," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(2), pages 176-196, November.
    13. Del Giudice, Teresa & Caracciolo, Francesco & Cicia, Gianni & Grunert, Klaus G. & Krystallis, Athanasios & Zhou, Yanfeng, 2012. "New Trends in Chinese Diet: Cultural Influences on Consumer Behavior," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144962, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. Tingqiang Chen & Lei Wang & Jining Wang & Qi Yang, 2017. "A Network Diffusion Model of Food Safety Scare Behavior considering Information Transparency," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, December.
    15. Jabbar, Mohammad A. & Admassu, Samuel A., 2009. "Assessing consumer preferences for quality and safety attributes of food in the absence of official standards: the case of beef in Ethiopia," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 50120, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Hattori, Keisuke & Higashida, Keisaku, 2014. "Misleading advertising and minimum quality standards," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-14.
    17. Vehapi Semir, 2015. "A Study of the Consumer Motives which Influence the Purchase of Organic Food in Serbia," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 53(1), pages 102-118, March.
    18. Meyer, Christian H. & Fritz, Melanie & Schiefer, Gerhard, 2010. "Customer Communication of Regional Quality Efforts: A Case From the Grain Sector," 2010 International European Forum, February 8-12, 2010, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 100595, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    19. Curzi, Daniele & Raimondi, Valentina & Olper, Alessandro, 2013. "Quality Upgrading, Competition and Trade Policy: Evidence from the Agri-Food Sector," 2013: Productivity and Its Impacts on Global Trade, June 2-4, 2013. Seville, Spain 152386, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    20. Jayson Lusk, 2011. "The market for animal welfare," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(4), pages 561-575, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:30:y:2013:i:3:p:443-455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.