IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v39y2025i4p882-903.html

Won’t Get Fooled Again? Theorizing Discursive Constructions of Novelty in the ‘New’ World of Work

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Aroles

    (University of York, UK)

  • Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte

    (Univ. Lille, CNRS, IESEG School of Management, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management, Lille F-59000, France)

  • John Hassard

    (University of Manchester, UK)

  • William M Foster

    (University of Alberta, Canada)

  • Edward Granter

    (University of Birmingham, UK)

Abstract

This article outlines how notions of novelty define today’s work practices and debates what the discursive construction of work as ‘new’ means. On the one hand, we highlight a misplaced emphasis on change and novelty that can lead to unnecessary dichotomization in the characterization and discursive construction of work practices and organizational phenomena. On the other, we specify substantive continuities in a range of strategic, organizational and employment arrangements. As such, we contend that a critical evaluation of key characteristics of contemporary work reveals that they are often not unique. Instead, these characteristics reflect the extending, rebranding or reshaping of measures and processes fashioned in earlier forms of value production. Ultimately, we theorize how the promotion of the ‘new’ world of work reflects structures and practices somehow altered in appearance, yet still analogous in substance, to those found in the traditional employment and production fabric of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Aroles & Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte & John Hassard & William M Foster & Edward Granter, 2025. "Won’t Get Fooled Again? Theorizing Discursive Constructions of Novelty in the ‘New’ World of Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(4), pages 882-903, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:882-903
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170241300948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170241300948
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170241300948?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremy Aroles & Nathalie Mitev & François-Xavier de Vaujany, 2019. "Mapping themes in the study of new work practices," Post-Print hal-02327015, HAL.
    2. Collin Constantine, 2017. "Economic structures, institutions and economic performance," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Mats Alvesson & Jörgen Sandberg, 2020. "The Problematizing Review: A Counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s Argument for Integrative Reviews," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1290-1304, September.
    4. Ashley Baber, 2024. "Labour Market Engineers: Reconceptualising Labour Market Intermediaries with the Rise of the Gig Economy in the United States," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(3), pages 723-743, June.
    5. Gerber, Christine, 2022. "Gender and precarity in platform work: Old inequalities in the new world of work," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 206-230.
    6. Leo McCann & Jonathan Morris & John Hassard, 2008. "Normalized Intensity: The New Labour Process of Middle Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 343-371, March.
    7. Janssen, M. & Stoopendaal, A.M.V. & Putters, K., 2015. "Situated novelty: Introducing a process perspective on the study of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1974-1984.
    8. Saori Shibata, 2020. "Gig Work and the Discourse of Autonomy: Fictitious Freedom in Japan’s Digital Economy," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 535-551, June.
    9. Roger L. M. Dunbar & William H. Starbuck, 2006. "Learning to Design Organizations and Learning from Designing Them," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 171-178, April.
    10. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    11. Jeremy Howells, 2012. "The geography of knowledge: never so close but never so far apart," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(5), pages 1003-1020, September.
    12. Adermon, Adrian & Hensvik, Lena, 2022. "Gig-jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Andrew Corbett & Joep Cornelissen & Andrew Delios & Bill Harley, 2014. "Variety, Novelty, and Perceptions of Scholarship in Research on Management and Organizations: An Appeal for Ambidextrous Scholarship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 3-18, January.
    14. John Van Maanen, 2011. "Ethnography as Work: Some Rules of Engagement," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 218-234, January.
    15. Patricia Everaert & Gerrit Sarens & Jan Rommel, 2010. "Using Transaction Cost Economics to explain outsourcing of accounting," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 93-112, July.
    16. Gerald Friedman, 2014. "Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 171-188, April.
    17. Anjali Chopra & Priyanka Bhilare, 2020. "Future of Work: An Empirical Study to Understand Expectations of the Millennials from Organizations," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 272-288, July.
    18. Briken, Kendra & Chillas, Shiona & Krzywdzinski, Martin & Marks, Abigail, 2017. "Labour Process Theory and the New Digital Workplace," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-17.
    19. Jonathan Morris & John Hassard & Rick Delbridge & Takahiro Endo, 2021. "Understanding managerial work in the modern Japanese firm: The influence of new organizational forms and changing human resource management practices," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(4), pages 1378-1406, November.
    20. Colin Hales, 2005. "Rooted in Supervision, Branching into Management: Continuity and Change in the Role of First‐Line Manager," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 471-506, May.
    21. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    22. Eve Chiapello & Norman Fairclough, 2002. "Understanding the new management ideology: a transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism," Post-Print hal-00466541, HAL.
    23. Elena Cefis & Riccardo Leoncini & Luigi Marengo & Sandro Montresor, 2023. "Firms and innovation in the new industrial paradigm of the digital transformation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeremy Aroles & Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte & John Hasard & William M Foster & Edward Granter, 2024. "Won't Get Fooled Again? Theorising Discursive Constructions of Novelty in the 'New' World of Work," Post-Print hal-04845366, HAL.
    2. Nada Endrissat & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03332209, HAL.
    3. Jan-Erik Vahlne & Jan Johanson, 2017. "From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(9), pages 1087-1102, December.
    4. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, Aurélie, 2021. "“Seeing to be seen”: The manager’s political economy of visibility in new ways of working," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 605-616.
    5. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte & Gazi Islam, 2024. "Renewing Experimentation in Organization Studies: Combining Inquiry with Drift," Post-Print hal-04549611, HAL.
    6. Deborah Giustini, 2021. "The Impact Of Labour Market Trends On The Employment Of R&D Personnel: A Literature Review," HSE Working papers WP BRP 117/STI/2021, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Jean-François Stich & Antonio Díaz Andrade & Wendelin Küpers, 2026. "Holiworking: Perspectives on New Ways of Integrating Holiday and Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 40(2), pages 250-272, April.
    8. Yuanyuan Li & Zuomiao Xie & Zhangjing Tui & Donghyup Woo, 2025. "The Impact of Digital Economy on Flexible Employment: The Mediating Role of Laborer Perceptions," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
    9. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "Exploring the New in Politics at Work: A Temporal Approach of Managerial Agencies," Post-Print hal-03330228, HAL.
    10. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte & Iain Munro & Yesh Nama & Robin Holt, 2021. "Control and Surveillance in Work Practice: Cultivating Paradox in ‘New’ Modes of Organizing," Post-Print hal-03268925, HAL.
    11. Schmück, Kilian & Schückes, Magnus & Gutmann, Tobias & Gassmann, Oliver, 2025. "Less trust, more truth: Implications and design choices for business models and platform ecosystems in the age of Web3," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Bill Harley & Dries Faems & Andrew Corbett, 2014. "A Few Bad Apples or the Tip of an Iceberg? Academic Misconduct in Publishing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(8), pages 1361-1363, December.
    13. Yi Wang & Yafei Yang & Zhaoxiang Qin & Yefei Yang & Jun Li, 2023. "A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Caroline Lloyd & Jonathan Payne, 2021. "Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and ‘routine’ work in the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 109-124, March.
    15. Gen-Yih Liao & Tzu-Ling Huang & Alan R. Dennis & Ching-I Teng, 2024. "The Influence of Media Capabilities on Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 165-183, March.
    16. Chimenti, Gianluca & Hagberg, Johan & Araujo, Luis, 2025. "Platforms, infrastructures and the Futures of market society," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Jie Li & Sijia Zhong, 2025. "Understanding the well-being of digital nomads from the perspective of self-determination theory – the case of China," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1229-1251, December.
    18. Anghel, Răzvan, 2019. "Implications of CJEU Jurisprudence on the Delimitation of Working Time by Rest Time in the Collaborative Economy," SocArXiv pj63e, Center for Open Science.
    19. Fischer, Michael Daniel & Ferlie, Ewan, 2013. "Resisting hybridisation between modes of clinical risk management: Contradiction, contest, and the production of intractable conflict," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 30-49.
    20. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:882-903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.