IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v57y2020i6p1290-1304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Problematizing Review: A Counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s Argument for Integrative Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Mats Alvesson
  • Jörgen Sandberg

Abstract

In this paper we provide a counterpoint to conventional views on integrative reviews in knowledge development, as exemplified by Elsbach and Van Knippenberg (2020). First, we critique their proposed integrative review by identifying and problematizing several key assumptions underlying it, particularly their idea that the integrative review can simply build on existing studies and lead the way to knowledge. Second, based on this critique, we propose as an alternative the problematizing review, which is based on the following four core principles: the ideal of reflexivity, reading more broadly but selectively, not accumulating but problematizing, and the concept that ‘less is more’. In contrast to the integrative review, which regards reviews as a ‘building exercise’, the problematizing review regards reviews as an ‘opening up exercise’ that enables researchers to imagine how to rethink existing literature in ways that generate new and ‘better’ ways of thinking about specific phenomena.

Suggested Citation

  • Mats Alvesson & Jörgen Sandberg, 2020. "The Problematizing Review: A Counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s Argument for Integrative Reviews," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1290-1304, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:57:y:2020:i:6:p:1290-1304
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12582
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corinne Post & Riikka Sarala & Caroline Gatrell & John E. Prescott, 2020. "Advancing Theory with Review Articles," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 351-376, March.
    2. Kimberly D. Elsbach & Daan van Knippenberg, 2020. "Creating High‐Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for ‘Integrative Reviews’," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1277-1289, September.
    3. Stanley Deetz, 1996. "Crossroads---Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 191-207, April.
    4. Andrew Corbett & Joep Cornelissen & Andrew Delios & Bill Harley, 2014. "Variety, Novelty, and Perceptions of Scholarship in Research on Management and Organizations: An Appeal for Ambidextrous Scholarship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 3-18, January.
    5. Blom, Martin & Alvesson, Mats, 2014. "Leadership On Demand: Followers as initiators and inhibitors of managerial leadership," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 344-357.
    6. Mats Alvesson & Jörgen Sandberg, 2013. "Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 128-152, January.
    7. Freese, Jeremy & Peterson, David, 2017. "Replication in Social Science," SocArXiv 5bck9, Center for Open Science.
    8. Timothy Clark & Mike Wright, 2009. "So, Farewell Then . . . Reflections on Editing the Journal of Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 1-9, January.
    9. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    10. Gerardo Patriotta, 2017. "Crafting Papers for Publication: Novelty and Convention in Academic Writing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 747-759, July.
    11. repec:osf:socarx:5bck9_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Wickert & Corinne Post & Jonathan P. Doh & John E. Prescott & Andrea Prencipe, 2021. "Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 297-320, March.
    2. Cruz, Angela Gracia B. & Cardoso, Flavia & Rojas-Gaviria, Pilar, 2022. "Crafting food products for culturally diverse markets: A narrative synthesis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 19-34.
    3. Jörgen Sandberg & Mats Alvesson, 2021. "Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 487-516, March.
    4. Cabiddu, Francesca & Moi, Ludovica & Patriotta, Gerardo & Allen, David G., 2022. "Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 685-706.
    5. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    6. Rodríguez Sánchez, Isabel & Makkonen, Teemu & Williams, Allan M., 2019. "Peer review assessment of originality in tourism journals: critical perspective of key gatekeepers," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Esther Calderon-Monge & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2024. "The role of digitalization in business and management: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 449-491, February.
    8. Sorin M. S. Krammer & Peter Dahlin & Jonathan P. Doh & Kristina Potočnik, 2024. "Happy Diamond Anniversary JMS! A Decade Analysis of the Journal of Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1654-1682, June.
    9. Appiah, Emmanuel Kusi & Gabrielsson, Peter & Rialp Criado, Alex, 2025. "The role of digitalization in early internationalization Research: A systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Sánchez-Pérez, Manuel & Marín-Carrillo, María Belén & Segovia-López, Cristina & Terán-Yépez, Eduardo, 2025. "Bibliometric articles in business and management: Factors affecting production and scholarly impact," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    11. Nguyen, Pascal & Rahman, Nahid & Zhao, Ruoyun, 2013. "Ownership structure and divestiture decisions: Evidence from Australian firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 170-181.
    12. Minas N. Kastanakis & Katerina Kampouri & Christian Linder & Michael Christofi & Alfredo Massis, 2025. "Linking biases and paradoxes in the family entrepreneurship context: an integrative framework for future research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 935-956, March.
    13. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    14. Paul, Justin & Criado, Alex Rialp, 2020. "The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    15. Klimas Patrycja & Stańczyk Sylwia & Sachpazidu Karina, 2023. "A Multipath Development Framework for Inter-Organizational Relationships: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 59(2), pages 33-52, June.
    16. Marie Madeleine Meurer & Maksim Belitski & Christian Fisch & Roy Thurik, 2024. "What gets published and what doesn’t? Exploring optimal distinctiveness and diverse expectations in entrepreneurship articles," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1139-1170, October.
    17. Sascha Kraus & Ricarda B. Bouncken & Alba Yela Aránega, 2024. "The burgeoning role of literature review articles in management research: an introduction and outlook," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 299-314, February.
    18. Beatriz Ferreira & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira, 2022. "The Contribution of Knowledge Management to Human Resource Development: a Systematic and Integrative Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2319-2347, September.
    19. Kimberly D. Elsbach & Daan van Knippenberg, 2020. "Creating High‐Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for ‘Integrative Reviews’," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1277-1289, September.
    20. Lehtonen, Salla & Seeck, Hannele, 2022. "Multilevel and multisite leadership development from a leadership-as-practice perspective: an integrative literature review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118462, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:57:y:2020:i:6:p:1290-1304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.