IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v42y2005i3p471-506.html

Rooted in Supervision, Branching into Management: Continuity and Change in the Role of First‐Line Manager

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Hales

Abstract

abstract It is frequently argued that, as a consequence of radical organizational change, the role of first‐line manager (FLM) has shifted from supervision to team leadership/co‐ordination or business unit management. After reviewing the nature of these claims and the debate about the relationship between first‐line management and supervision, evidence is presented from a survey of 135 organizations in London and the South East on how the role of FLM is presently defined and how it has changed. The findings paint a picture of a stable, consistent FLM role where a common performance‐oriented supervisory core is surrounded by a penumbra of additional managerial responsibilities relating to stewardship, translating strategy into operations, unit management and, exceptionally, business management. The FLM role remains part of a hierarchical system of individual managerial responsibility and vertical accountability, with narrow spans of control, vertical and internal contacts and authority, participation in decisions and accountability confined largely to operating routines. Changes to the FLM role have been as much towards a strengthening of the supervisory core as a broadening into business management responsibilities. It is argued that the persistence and prevalence of the supervisory core stems from the continued location of FLMs within systems of external, hierarchical supervision. Far from being weakened, the supervisory core of the FLM role has often been strengthened by the adoption of more stringent controls over work practice in order to cope with a growth in business activity or comply with a greater range of external regulations. In some cases, however, a re‐division of managerial labour has led to formerly middle management responsibilities and accountability being added to the supervisory core to produce an extended FLM role.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Hales, 2005. "Rooted in Supervision, Branching into Management: Continuity and Change in the Role of First‐Line Manager," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 471-506, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:42:y:2005:i:3:p:471-506
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00506.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00506.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00506.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Rose & Gordon Marshall & Howard Newby & Carolyn Vogler, 1987. "Goodbye to Supervisors?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 1(1), pages 7-24, March.
    2. Berg, Per Olof, 1989. "Postmodern management? From facts to fiction in theory and practice," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 201-217.
    3. Osterman, Paul, 1994. "Supervision, Discretion, and Work Organization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 380-384, May.
    4. James Lowe, 1993. "Manufacturing Reform And The Changing Role Of The Production Supervisor: The Case Of The Automobile Industry," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 739-758, September.
    5. Rosemary Stewart, 1989. "Studies Of Managerial Jobs And Behaviour: The Ways Forward," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 1-10, January.
    6. P. Du Gay & G. Salaman & B. Rees, 1996. "The Conduct of Management and the Management of Conduct: Contemporary Managerial Discourse and the Constitution of the ‘Competent’ Manager," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 263-282, May.
    7. Pettigrew, Andrew & Massini, Silvia & Numagami, Tsuyoshi, 2000. "Innovative forms of organising in Europe and Japan," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 259-273, June.
    8. Ezzamel, Mahmoud & Lilley, Simon & Willmott, Hugh, 1994. "The 'new organization' and the 'new managerial work'," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 454-461, December.
    9. Whittington, Richard & Mayer, Michael, 2000. "The European Corporation: Strategy, Structure, and Social Science," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199242085.
    10. Gallie, Duncan & White, Michael & Cheng, Yuan & Tomlinson, Mark, 1998. "Restructuring the Employment Relationship," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198294412.
    11. Donna S. Rothstein, 2001. "Supervisory Status and Upper-Level Supervisory Responsibilities: Evidence from the NLSY79," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(3), pages 663-680, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ariel C. Avgar & Niti Pandey & Kiwook Kwon, 2012. "Discretion in Context: A Moderated Mediation Model of the Relationship between Discretion and Turnover Intentions," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 106-128, January.
    2. repec:bla:jomstd:v:40:y:2003:i:3:p:609-616 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bryson, Alex, 2001. "Union effects on managerial and employee perceptions of employee relations in Britain," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4957, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Dennis J. Snower & Alessio J. G. Brown & Christian Merkl, 2009. "Globalization and the Welfare State: A Review of Hans-Werner Sinn's Can Germany Be Saved?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 136-158, March.
    5. Danuta DiskienÄ— & Virginijus TamaÅ¡eviÄ ius & AgnÄ— KalvaitytÄ—, 2018. "MANAGERIAL ROLES IN SMEs AND THEIR EFFECT ON PERCEIVED MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS IN LITHUANIA," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(1).
    6. Oscar Smallenbroek & Florian R. Hertel & Carlo Barone, 2024. "Measuring Class Hierarchies in Postindustrial Societies: A Criterion and Construct Validation of EGP and ESEC Across 31 Countries," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(3), pages 1412-1452, August.
    7. Simon Luechinger & Stephan Meier & Alois Stutzer, 2010. "Why Does Unemployment Hurt the Employed?: Evidence from the Life Satisfaction Gap Between the Public and the Private Sector," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 45(4), pages 998-1045.
    8. Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J., 2004. "Well-being over time in Britain and the USA," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(7-8), pages 1359-1386, July.
    9. Stephen C. Hansen, 1997. "Designing Internal Controls: The Interaction between Efficiency Wages and Monitoring," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 129-163, March.
    10. John H. Pencavel, 2004. "The Surprising Retreat of Union Britain," NBER Chapters, in: Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980–2000, pages 181-232, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. K Clark & M Tomlinson, 2001. "The Determinants of Work Effort: Evidence from the Employment in Britain Survey," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0113, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    12. Duncan Gallie, 2012. "Skills, Job Control and the Quality of Work:The Evidence from Britain Geary Lecture 2012," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 43(3), pages 325-341.
    13. Mohammed-Aminu Sanda, 2011. "Managerial Self-efficacy and Discretionary Behavior Improving Work Environment for Small Firm Performance," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 2(6), pages 259-266.
    14. Alex Bryson & Rafael Gomez & P Willman, 2003. "Why Do Voice Regimes Differ?," CEP Discussion Papers dp0591, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    15. Francis Green, 2004. "Work Intensification, Discretion, and the Decline in Well-Being at Work," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 30(4), pages 615-625, Fall.
    16. Isabela dos Santos Paes & Jean-Luc Moriceau & Géraldine Guérillot & Julien Billion, 2014. "Entrepreneur et salarié : parcours et identités dans le portage salarial," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-02394355, HAL.
    17. Filstad, Cathrine & Olsen, Trude Høgvold & Karp, Tom, 2021. "Constructing managerial manoeuvring space in contradictory contexts," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 467-475.
    18. Susan Sayce & Peter Ackers & Anne-Marie Greene, 2007. "Work restructuring and changing craft identity," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 21(1), pages 85-101, March.
    19. Zoe Zoupanou & Mark Cropley & Leif W Rydstedt, 2013. "Recovery after Work: The Role of Work Beliefs in the Unwinding Process," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Alex Bryson & Erling Barth & Harald Dale-Olsen, 2013. "The Effects of Organizational Change on Worker Well-Being and the Moderating Role of Trade Unions," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 66(4), pages 989-1011, July.
    21. Ida Regalia, 2001. "Local-level concertation: the scope for innovative regulation of non-standard forms of employment in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 7(4), pages 657-673, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:42:y:2005:i:3:p:471-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.