IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v18y2000i3p259-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative forms of organising in Europe and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Pettigrew, Andrew
  • Massini, Silvia
  • Numagami, Tsuyoshi

Abstract

Recent writing on contemporary organisations is suggestive of extensive moves to create more responsive and flexible firms. Such claims often rest on studies of exceptional organisations or atypical sectors. Drawing on large-scale surveys of organisational innovations in Europe and Japan, this paper finds widespread but not revolutionary change in terms of organisational structures, processes and boundaries. In comparing innovative forms of organising in 1992 and 1996, the survey results show some similarities in the direction of change between European and Japanese organisations but from different starting points. The pace of innovation is generally much faster in Europe than in Japan. This pattern of more incremental change in Japan and more radical change in Europe is overlaid by a tendency for firms in both regions to seek new forms of organising by simultaneously altering their structures, processes and boundaries. Managing such a complementary change agenda is creating real process challenges for European and Japanese organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Pettigrew, Andrew & Massini, Silvia & Numagami, Tsuyoshi, 2000. "Innovative forms of organising in Europe and Japan," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 259-273, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:18:y:2000:i:3:p:259-273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237300000086
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mike Pedler, 2012. "All in a knot of one another's labours: self-determination, network organising and learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 5-28, March.
    2. Glenn Morgan, 2003. "Introduction," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 609-616, May.
    3. Astadi Pangarso, 2020. "A New Theoretical Framework of Organizational Effectiveness from Knowledge and Ambidexterity Perspectives," GATR Journals jmmr257, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    4. Paolo Pini & Grazia Santangelo, 2005. "Innovation types and labour organisational practices: A comparison of foreign and domestic firms in the Reggio Emilia industrial districts," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 251-276.
    5. Richard M. Burton & Borge Obel, 2013. "Design rules for dynamic organization design: the contribution of computational modeling," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Gabriel Sorin STROE, 2014. "On The Threat Of Suppliers For The Engineering Consulting And Design Services Firms," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 140-149.
    7. Lise Lamothe & Yvon Dufour, 2007. "Systems of interdependency and core orchestrating themes at health care unit level," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 67-85, March.
    8. Schweiger, David M. & Atamer, Tugrul & Calori, Roland, 2003. "Transnational project teams and networks: making the multinational organization more effective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 127-140, May.
    9. Massini, Silvia & Lewin, Arie Y. & Numagami, Tsuyoshi & Pettigrew, Andrew M., 2002. "The evolution of organizational routines among large Western and Japanese firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8-9), pages 1333-1348, December.
    10. John Sillince & Paula Jarzabkowski & Duncan Shaw, 2012. "Shaping Strategic Action Through the Rhetorical Construction and Exploitation of Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 630-650, June.
    11. Angel J. Salazar Alvarez, 2003. "Managing Knowledge Flows between High-Tech Firms and Universities: Empirical Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry in the UK," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(04), pages 309-319.
    12. Ali Mohammadi & Hossein Karami, 2014. "The Role of Universities in Innovation Development as Trainer and Innovator," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(7), pages 471-486.
    13. Colin Hales, 2005. "Rooted in Supervision, Branching into Management: Continuity and Change in the Role of First‐Line Manager," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 471-506, May.
    14. Fariza ACHCAOUCAOU & Merce BERNARDO & Jose M. CASTAN, 2009. "Determinants of Organisational Structures: An Empirical Study," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(3), pages 566-577, July.
    15. Felipe A. Csaszar, 2013. "An Efficient Frontier in Organization Design: Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Exploration and Exploitation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1083-1101, August.
    16. Caliz, Cristina & Quintanilla, Javier & Pin, Jose R., 2001. "Influencia de la nueva economía en la dirección de personas," IESE Research Papers D/440, IESE Business School.
    17. N A D Connell & J H Klein & P L Powell, 2003. "It's tacit knowledge but not as we know it: redirecting the search for knowledge," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(2), pages 140-152, February.
    18. Jean Hartley & Michael J. R. Butler & John Benington, 2002. "Local Government Modernization: UK and Comparative Analysis from an Organizational Perspective," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 387-404, January.
    19. Haji Ali Beigi, Maryam, 2021. "Organizational innovation: Interactive role of external knowledge strategies and market dynamisms," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 159, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    20. Christian Rupietta & Johannes Meuer & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2018. "How do apprentices moderate the influence of organizational innovation on the technological innovation process?," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0145, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW), revised Jan 2021.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:18:y:2000:i:3:p:259-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.