IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v45y2014i2p183-203.html

Evaluating a Project Management Simulation Training Exercise

Author

Listed:
  • Ki-Young Jeong
  • Ipek Bozkurt

Abstract

This research is an evaluation of a single-player, project management simulation training exercise. Our objective is to gain understanding about the extent to which it contributes to participants’ project management knowledge and skills. Results from pre- and post-simulation exercise questionnaires indicate that overall the simulation exercise significantly improves a participant’s conceptual knowledge about project management. It also indicates that participants with less experience achieve more knowledge improvement than those with more experience. Results further indicate that the actual performance of the exercise, which represents the educational value of the exercise, is primarily dependent on the post-project management knowledge of the participant established throughout the exercise, prior knowledge brought to the exercise, and the experience of the participant. We believe that these results indicate that the simulation training exercise is a valuable training tool, which both engineering and project managers can use.

Suggested Citation

  • Ki-Young Jeong & Ipek Bozkurt, 2014. "Evaluating a Project Management Simulation Training Exercise," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(2), pages 183-203, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:2:p:183-203
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878113518481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878113518481
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878113518481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casper Harteveld & Geertje Bekebrede, 2011. "Learning in Single-Versus Multiplayer Games: The More the Merrier?," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(1), pages 43-63, February.
    2. Brad W. Mayer & Kathleen M. Dale & Katherine A. Fraccastoro & Gisele Moss, 2011. "Improving Transfer of Learning: Relationship to Methods of Using Business Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(1), pages 64-84, February.
    3. Charles F. Petranek, 2000. "Written Debriefing: The Next Vital Step in Learning with Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 31(1), pages 108-118, March.
    4. John D. Sterman, 1989. "Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 321-339, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sy, Charlle, 2017. "A policy development model for reducing bullwhips in hybrid production-distribution systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 67-79.
    2. Pastore, Erica & Alfieri, Arianna & Zotteri, Giulio, 2019. "An empirical investigation on the antecedents of the bullwhip effect: Evidence from the spare parts industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 121-133.
    3. Berry, D. & Naim, M. M., 1996. "Quantifying the relative improvements of redesign strategies in a P.C. supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 181-196, December.
    4. Towill, Denis R. & Zhou, Li & Disney, Stephen M., 2007. "Reducing the bullwhip effect: Looking through the appropriate lens," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 444-453, July.
    5. Jonnie L. Hill & Cynthia G. Lance, 2002. "Debriefing Stress," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 33(4), pages 490-503, December.
    6. Kull, Thomas & Closs, David, 2008. "The risk of second-tier supplier failures in serial supply chains: Implications for order policies and distributor autonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(3), pages 1158-1174, May.
    7. Ademola Amida & Woei Hung & Sameera Algarni, 2024. "System modelling: Exploring engineering students perceptions and learning outcomes," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 598-613, July.
    8. Oliva, Rogelio, 2003. "Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 552-568, December.
    9. Jonna Koponen & Saara Julkunen, 2015. "Theoretical Principles of Simulation-Based Sales Communication Training," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(2), pages 137-147, April.
    10. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    11. Ma, Yungao & Wang, Nengmin & He, Zhengwen & Lu, Jizhou & Liang, Huigang, 2015. "Analysis of the bullwhip effect in two parallel supply chains with interacting price-sensitive demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 815-825.
    12. Rich, Karl M. & Ross, R. Brent & Baker, A. Derek & Negassa, Asfaw, 2011. "Quantifying value chain analysis in the context of livestock systems in developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 214-222, April.
    13. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2012. "Bullwhip Effect Measurement and Its Implications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 771-784, August.
    14. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    15. Gérard P. Cachon & Paul H. Zipkin, 1999. "Competitive and Cooperative Inventory Policies in a Two-Stage Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 936-953, July.
    16. Abdul Khabir Rahmat, 2025. "LogistiQuest as a Tool for Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Cargo Project Management ," GATR Journals jber258, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    17. Zhang, Xiaolong & Burke, Gerard J., 2011. "Analysis of compound bullwhip effect causes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 514-526, May.
    18. Lin, Jinchai & Fan, Ruguo & Tan, Xianchun & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2021. "Dynamic decision and coordination in a low-carbon supply chain considering the retailer's social preference," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Arunachalam Narayanan & Brent B. Moritz, 2015. "Decision Making and Cognition in Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: An Experimental Study," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1216-1234, August.
    20. Saeed P. Langarudi & Carlos G. Silva & Alexander G. Fernald, 2021. "Measure more or report faster? Effect of information perception on management of commons," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(1), pages 72-92, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:2:p:183-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.