IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v43y2015i2p206-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Replication of “Millionaire Migration and State Taxation of Top Incomes

* This paper is a replication of an original study

Author

Listed:
  • Roger S. Cohen

    (Department of the Treasury, Trenton, NJ, USA)

  • Andrew E. Lai

    (Department of the Treasury, Trenton, NJ, USA)

  • Charles Steindel

    () (Department of the Treasury, Trenton, NJ, USA)

Abstract

We reevaluate Young and Varner’s (YV) study of the effect of New Jersey’s 2004 income tax increase on migration. The 2004 “millionaires’ tax†raised New Jersey’s marginal income tax rate from 6.37 percent to 8.97 percent on incomes over US$500,000. YV reported that the tax change apparently had no effect on net out-migration of affected taxpayers (relative to other affluent taxpayers); however, this result appears to be due to their modeling New Jersey out-migration and in-migration simultaneously to determine net migration effects. Correcting for this, we find a statistically significant increase in the out-migration of taxpayers making over US$500,000 of roughly eighty per year in the years following the tax change. Given that the increase likely spurred out-migration in groups not directly taxed and discouraged in-migration, our estimates may understate the actual impact of the tax on New Jersey net out-migration.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger S. Cohen & Andrew E. Lai & Charles Steindel, 2015. "A Replication of “Millionaire Migration and State Taxation of Top Incomes," Public Finance Review, , vol. 43(2), pages 206-225, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:43:y:2015:i:2:p:206-225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pfr.sagepub.com/content/43/2/206.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    Replication

    This item is a replication of:
  • Young, Cristobal & Varner, Charles, 2011. "Millionaire Migration and State Taxation of Top Incomes: Evidence From a Natural Experiment," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 64(2), pages 255-283, June.
  • Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:43:y:2015:i:2:p:206-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.