IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v57y2003i1p3-30.html

John R. Commons and the Wisconsin School on Industrial Relations Strategy and Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce E. Kaufman

Abstract

The field of industrial relations in the United States is largely rooted in the early twentieth-century writings of John R. Commons and the Wisconsin School. The author documents and describes their strategy and recommended policy approach for improved industrial relations. The three core components of their strategy were stabilization of markets, equalization of bargaining power, and constitutional government in industrial enterprise. The author also shows that the thinking of Commons and his associates on the best way to achieve these three goals—and, in particular, their view of the appropriate mix of trade unionism, labor law, personnel management, and macroeconomic monetary/fiscal policy—evolved through four distinct phases, starting about 1900 and ending in the late 1930s.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce E. Kaufman, 2003. "John R. Commons and the Wisconsin School on Industrial Relations Strategy and Policy," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 57(1), pages 3-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:57:y:2003:i:1:p:3-30
    DOI: 10.1177/001979390305700101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001979390305700101
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/001979390305700101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Godard & John T. Delaney, 2000. "Reflections on the “High Performance†Paradigm's Implications for Industrial Relations as a Field," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 53(3), pages 482-502, April.
    2. Charles J. Whalen, 1993. "Saving Capitalism by Making It Good: The Monetary Economics of John R. Commons," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 1155-1179, December.
    3. J. Dennis Chasse, 1994. "The American Association for Labor Legislation and the Institutionalist Tradition in National Health Insurance," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 1063-1090, December.
    4. Commons, John R., 1913. "Labor and Administration," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number commons1913.
    5. Thomas A. Kochan, 2000. "On the Paradigm Guiding Industrial Relations Theory and Research Comment on John Godard and John T. Delaney, “Reflections on the ‘High Performance’ Paradigm's Implications for Industrial Relatio," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 53(4), pages 704-711, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janice Fine & Michael Piore, 2021. "Introduction to a Special Issue on the New Labor Federalism," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(5), pages 1085-1102, October.
    2. Michel Rocca, 2017. "L'analyse économique du travail. Complémentarité ou parallélisme des propositions théoriques depuis les années 1880," Working Papers halshs-01566506, HAL.
    3. Benjamin Dubrion, 2021. "John R. Commons, penseur du travail," Post-Print halshs-03190364, HAL.
    4. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2009. "Promoting Labour Market Efficiency and Fairness through a Legal Minimum Wage: The Webbs and the Social Cost of Labour," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 306-326, June.
    5. Susan HAYTER, 2015. "Introduction: What future for industrial relations?," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 154(1), pages 1-4, March.
    6. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2024. "Advancing a system-level perspective in stakeholder theory: Insights from the institutional economics of John R. Commons," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 443-467.
    7. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2010. "Institutional Economics and the Minimum Wage: Broadening the Theoretical and Policy Debate," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 63(3), pages 427-453, April.
    8. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2008. "Paradigms in Industrial Relations: Original, Modern and Versions In‐between," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 314-339, June.
    9. Drakopoulos, Stavros A. & Katselidis, Ioannis, 2021. "The Old Institutional School and Labour Market Functions and Policies," MPRA Paper 110794, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Ioannis A. Katselidis, 2019. "Institutions, Policy and the Labour Market: The Contribution of the Old Institutional Economics," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 8, pages 13-30, December.
    11. Alexandre Chirat & Ulysse Lojkine, 2024. "Three views on economic power," EconomiX Working Papers 2024-31, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    12. Korkut Alp Erturk, 2019. "Class Agency Under Conditions of Self-Enforcement: Marx on Capitalists' Common's Problem," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2019_01, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
    13. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2016. "Experience with Company Unions and their Treatment under the Wagner Act: A Four Frames of Reference Analysis," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 3-39, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaufman, Bruce E., 1998. "Regulation of the employment relationship: The 'old' institutional perspective," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 349-385, March.
    2. Glen Atkinson & Charles J. Whalen, 2011. "Futurity: cornerstone of Post Keynsian institutionalism," Chapters, in: Charles J. Whalen (ed.), Financial Instability and Economic Security after the Great Recession, chapter 3, pages 53-74, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Amanda Pyman & Peter Holland & Julian Teicher & Brian K. Cooper, 2010. "Industrial Relations Climate, Employee Voice and Managerial Attitudes to Unions: An Australian Study," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(2), pages 460-480, June.
    4. Maddy Janssens & Chris Steyaert, 2009. "HRM and Performance: A Plea for Reflexivity in HRM Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 143-155, January.
    5. Jeffrey B. Arthur, 2011. "Do HR System Characteristics Affect the Frequency of Interpersonal Deviance in Organizations? The Role of Team Autonomy and Internal Labor Market Practices," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 30-56, January.
    6. John Godard, 2001. "High Performance and the Transformation of Work? The Implications of Alternative Work Practices for the Experience and Outcomes of Work," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(4), pages 776-805, July.
    7. Richard A. Gonce, 2006. "John R. Commons’ Successful Plan for Constitutional, Effective Labor Legislation," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1045-1067, December.
    8. Forand, Jean Guillaume, 2019. "Civil service and the growth of government," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Arturo Hermann, 2012. "Policy responses to economic and financial crises: insights from heterodox economics and psychoanalysis," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 8-22.
    10. Pruneda, Gabriel, 2014. "Employee coverage of high-performance work systems in Spain: a comparative analysis before and during economic retrenchment," MPRA Paper 83909, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Kozica, Arjan & Kaiser, Stephan, 2012. "A Sustainability Perspective on Flexible HRM: How to Cope with Paradoxes of Contingent Work," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(3), pages 239-261.
    12. Charles J. Whalen, 2020. "Post-Keynesian institutionalism: past, present, and future," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 71-92, January.
    13. Guimarães, Julio Cesar Ferro de & Severo, Eliana Andrea & Dorion, Eric Charles Henri & Coallier, François & Olea, Pelayo Munhoz, 2016. "The use of organisational resources for product innovation and organisational performance: A survey of the Brazilian furniture industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 135-147.
    14. Cedric E. Dawkins, 2019. "A Normative Argument for Independent Voice and Labor Unions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1153-1165, April.
    15. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2008. "Paradigms in Industrial Relations: Original, Modern and Versions In‐between," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 314-339, June.
    16. Dong-One Kim, 2005. "The Benefits and Costs of Employee Suggestions under Gainsharing," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 58(4), pages 631-652, July.
    17. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas, 2011. "Technological learning environments and organizational practices--cross-sectoral evidence from Britain," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 20(5), pages 1439-1474, October.
    18. Dionne Pohler & Andrew Luchak, 2015. "Are Unions Good or Bad for Organizations? The Moderating Role of Management's Response," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 423-459, September.
    19. Ioannis A. Katselidis, 2019. "Institutions, Policy and the Labour Market: The Contribution of the Old Institutional Economics," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 8, pages 13-30, December.
    20. Larry W. Hunter & John Paul MacDuffie & Lorna Doucet, 2002. "What Makes Teams Take? Employee Reactions to Work Reforms," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 55(3), pages 448-472, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:57:y:2003:i:1:p:3-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.