IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v43y2022i4p1934-1957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employers’ views on flexible employment contracts for younger workers: Benefits, downsides and societal outlook

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Rouvroye

    (Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI-KNAW); University of Groningen (RUG), the Netherlands)

  • Hendrik P van Dalen

    (Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI-KNAW); University of Groningen (RUG), the Netherlands; Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Economics and Management (TISEM), the Netherlands)

  • Kène Henkens

    (Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI-KNAW); University of Groningen (RUG), University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), the Netherlands; University of Amsterdam (UVA), Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, the Netherlands)

  • Joop J Schippers

    (Utrecht University (UU), Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, the Netherlands)

Abstract

Employers are instrumental in the growth of non-standard employment, which exposes predominantly younger workers to higher levels of insecurity. Using an interdisciplinary theoretical lens, this article identifies which considerations, both positive and negative, underlie employers’ decision making with regard to the use of flexible contracts for younger workers and discusses how employers perceive future implications of an increasingly flexible labour market. Findings are based on interviews with 26 managers, HR professionals and directors working in different sectors of industry in the Netherlands: local government, education, health care, retail, corporate services and transport and logistics. While acknowledging benefits to the use of flexible contracts, interviewed employers also reported downsides to this practice. Using flexible contracts complicates retention of young talent, deters investment in training, negatively affects social morale on the work floor and puts pressure on younger workers. Interviewees did not deem employers primarily responsible for monitoring societal consequences of an increasingly flexible labour market and often did not see the bigger picture of how increased flexibility could have negative societal consequences. The findings suggest that corrective actions will not come from the side of employers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Rouvroye & Hendrik P van Dalen & Kène Henkens & Joop J Schippers, 2022. "Employers’ views on flexible employment contracts for younger workers: Benefits, downsides and societal outlook," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(4), pages 1934-1957, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:43:y:2022:i:4:p:1934-1957
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X211053378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X211053378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X211053378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:43:y:2022:i:4:p:1934-1957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.