IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Bidding for Business: New Evidence on the Effect of Locally Offered Economic Development Incentives in a Metropolitan Area

Listed author(s):
  • Robert W. Wassmer

    (California State University, Sacramento)

  • John E. Anderson

    (University of Nebraska, Lincoln)

The use of local economic development incentives within a metropolitan area has undergone less analysis than incentives that attempt to alter interregional business location decisions. This is unfortunate because other factors that influence where business resides are constant across cities in a metropolitan area, and a properly used incentive is more likely to alter a business location decision. To comment on these issues, the authors use a simultaneous equation model to conduct regression analyses of panel data from 112 cities in the Detroit metropolitan area. They find that only certain forms of local incentives, at certain times, exert the expected positive influence on the local value of commercial and manufacturing property. The findings are tied to issues related to the redistribution of economic activity from the core to the periphery in U.S. metropolitan areas, and the authors conclude with policy suggestions on the future use of local incentives.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by in its journal Economic Development Quarterly.

Volume (Year): 15 (2001)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
Pages: 132-148

in new window

Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:15:y:2001:i:2:p:132-148
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:15:y:2001:i:2:p:132-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.