IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/merase/v10y2025i2p503-516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Impact of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) on the Firm Performance of Indonesia State-Owned Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Dinda Amalia CANDELA

    (Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)

  • Machmudin Eka PRASETYA

    (Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the impact of enterprise risk management (ERM) on company performance in Indonesia’s state-owned enterprises (SOE). This study took a sample of 40 Indonesia SOEs from 2021-2023, with 100 observations. The ERM aspects consist of the Directors of Risk Management, Risk Management Committee, Reporting between Directors to the Risk Management Committee, Risk Assessment, Risk Management Framework, and Risk Management Maturity. At the same time, Company performance is measured by Return on Assets (ROA). Hypothesis testing was carried out using the Ordinary Least Square method, and it showed that the Directors of Risk Management aspect had a significant positive effect on ROA. The Risk Management Committee aspect, reporting between Directors to the Risk Management Committee, Risk Assessment, and Risk Management Framework had no significant effect on ROA. In contrast, the overall implementation of ERM, as measured by RMI, had a significant positive effect on ROA.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinda Amalia CANDELA & Machmudin Eka PRASETYA, 2025. "An Analysis of the Impact of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) on the Firm Performance of Indonesia State-Owned Enterprises," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(2), pages 503-516, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:merase:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:503-516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mer.ase.ro/files/2025-2/10-2-15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:cbooks:9781107034662 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Eduardo Duque-Grisales & Javier Aguilera-Caracuel, 2021. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 315-334, January.
    3. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    4. Basiru Salisu Kallamu, 2015. "Risk Management Committee Attributes and Firm Performance," International Finance and Banking, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Callahan, Carolyn & Soileau, Jared, 2017. "Does Enterprise risk management enhance operating performance?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 122-139.
    6. Agrawal, Anup & Knoeber, Charles R., 1996. "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 377-397, September.
    7. Afzalur Rashid, 2016. "Managerial Ownership and Agency Cost: Evidence from Bangladesh," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 609-621, September.
    8. Anup Agrawal & Charles R. Knoeber, "undated". "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders (Revision of 29-94)," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 8-96, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    9. Purwatiningsih Lisdiono & Jamaliah Said & Haslinda Yusoff & Ancella Anitawati Hermawan, 2022. "Examining Leadership Capabilities, Risk Management Practices, and Organizational Resilience: The Case of State-Owned Enterprises in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Florio, Cristina & Leoni, Giulia, 2017. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 56-74.
    11. Brooks,Chris, 2014. "Introductory Econometrics for Finance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107661455, December.
    12. Alexander Bohnert & Nadine Gatzert & Robert E. Hoyt & Philipp Lechner, 2019. "The drivers and value of enterprise risk management: evidence from ERM ratings," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 234-255, February.
    13. Mark Farrell & Ronan Gallagher, 2015. "The Valuation Implications of Enterprise Risk Management Maturity," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 82(3), pages 625-657, September.
    14. Upadhyay, Arun D. & Bhargava, Rahul & Faircloth, Sheri D., 2014. "Board structure and role of monitoring committees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1486-1492.
    15. Anup Agrawal & Charles R. Knoeber, "undated". "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders (Revision of 29-94)," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 08-96, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brahmadev Panda & N. M. Leepsa, 2017. "Agency theory: Review of Theory and Evidence on Problems and Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 10(1), pages 74-95, June.
    2. Alley Ibrahim S. & Adebayo Abimbola L. & Oligbi Blessing O., 2016. "Corporate Governance and Financial Performance Nexus: Any Bidirectional Causality?," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 50(1), pages 82-99, June.
    3. Ghosh, Saibal, 2007. "Leverage, managerial monitoring and firm valuation: A simultaneous equation approach," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 84-98, June.
    4. M. Ameziane Lasfer, 2006. "The Interrelationship Between Managerial Ownership and Board Structure," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1006-1033, September.
    5. Hoje Jo & Maretno Harjoto, 2011. "Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 351-383, October.
    6. Ning Zhang, 2016. "The effects of anticipated future investments on firm value: evidence from mergers and acquisitions," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 516-558, June.
    7. Sulaiman Ademola Oreshile & Nurul Shahnaz Mahdzan & Rozaimah Zainudin, 2025. "Enterprise risk management quality and firm value: Evidence from corporate reputation risk theory," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-31, February.
    8. Premepeh, kwadwo Boateng & Odartei-Mills, Eugene, 2015. "Corporate governance structure and shareholder wealth maximisation," MPRA Paper 68087, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Golbe, Devra L. & Nyman, Ingmar, 2013. "How do share repurchases affect ownership concentration?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 22-40.
    10. Germain, Laurent & Galy, Nadine & Lee, Wanling, 2014. "Corporate governance reform in Malaysia: Board size, independence and monitoring," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 126-162.
    11. Aida Sy & Lamia Jamel & Abdelkader Derbali, 2017. "Do ownership structure and quality of financial information affect the cost of debt of Tunisian listing firms?," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 140-153.
    12. Enalto de Oliveira Gondrige & Ademir Clemente & Márcia Maria dos Santos Bortolocci Espejo, 2012. "Composition of the board and firm value of brazilian public companies," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 9(3), pages 71-93, July.
    13. Carola Frydman & Dirk Jenter, 2010. "CEO Compensation," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 75-102, December.
    14. Paul McGuinness & Kevin Lam & João Vieito, 2015. "Gender and other major board characteristics in China: Explaining corporate dividend policy and governance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 989-1038, December.
    15. Detthamrong, Umawadee & Chancharat, Nongnit & Vithessonthi, Chaiporn, 2017. "Corporate governance, capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 689-709.
    16. Shoaib Khan & Yasushi Suzuki, 2016. "Ownership and Capital Structure of Pakistani Non Financial Firms," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 57-67.
    17. Wolfgang Drobetz & Pascal Pensa & Markus M. Schmid, 2007. "Estimating the Cost of Executive Stock Options: evidence from Switzerland," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 798-815, September.
    18. Mehmet Levent Erdaş & Emel Bachá Sımoes, 2020. "The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 62(62), pages 255-284, December.
    19. Rajaa Mtanios & Mathieu Paquerot, 1999. "Structure de propriété et sous-performance des firmes: une étude empirique sur le marché au comptant, le règlement mensuel et le second marché," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 2(4), pages 157-179, December.
    20. Fernando Lefort & Eduardo Walker, 2005. "The Effect of Corporate Governance Practices on Company Market Valuation and Payout Policy in Chile," Research Department Publications 3210, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:merase:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:503-516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.