IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/e15611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International comparison of the effectiveness of fiscal and insurance models of healthcare financing

Author

Listed:
  • Sheinman, Igor

    () (NRU HSE)

  • Terentieva, Svetlana

    () (NRU HSE)

Abstract

The article analyzes the comparative characteristics of the two main models of health care financing: mandatory health insurance (MHI) and budget. Based on the theoretical analysis of their characteristics are formulated hypotheses about the impact of funding models on the performance of health care. Check these hypotheses performed by estimating multifactor econometric model based on the data on 28 post-Soviet countries for the period 1991-2012 years (27 indicators). It confirmed the hypothesis that the CHI system provides a steady flow of public expenditure on health, compared with the budget model. In discussing the results obtained emphasis on the variability of ways of organizing the CHI system of the countries. It is concluded that the benefits of a model MLA realized only when it is a rational design.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheinman, Igor & Terentieva, Svetlana, 2015. "International comparison of the effectiveness of fiscal and insurance models of healthcare financing," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 171-193.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:e15611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://w82.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/e15611.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ensor, Tim & Thompson, Robin, 1998. "Health insurance as a catalyst to change in former communist countries?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 203-218, March.
    2. Adam Wagstaff, 2010. "Social health insurance reexamined," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(5), pages 503-517.
    3. Шейман И. М. & Шевский В. И., 2015. "Кадровая Политика В Здравоохранении: Сравнительный Анализ Российской И Международной Практики," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 1, pages 143-167.
    4. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    health financing; compulsory medical insurance; post-Soviet countries;

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:e15611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.