IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Dollarisation officielle : analyse critique et alternative

Listed author(s):
  • Le Maux, Laurent

    (Université de Paris VIII)

The lack of immunity to speculative attacks in currency board arrangements has led some economists to advocate official dollarization or euroization. Dollarization cancels the reserve system, but dollarization is dangerous because it leads to an “inelasticity of the currency” which destabilizes the price level and the system of payment. The banking system we call “banking board” can be suggested as an alternative to currency board and dollarization. Under banking board, banking system could issue demand deposits as banknotes convertible at par into reserve money. Besides the absence of exchange risk and the fall in the interest rate, the banking board by introducing an elasticity of the currency alleviates deflation pressures and stabilizes banks’ reserves. The last but not the least, a banks’ bank acting as lender of last resort can emerge or can be created, and its prudential policy can be more precise. La dollarisation ou l’euroisation officielles ont été récemment préconisées du fait de la persistance d’attaques spéculatives sous le système du currency board. La dollarisation supprime la réserve unique, mais elle demeure dangereuse, car elle conduit à une « inélasticité de l’offre de billets » déstabilisant le système bancaire et le niveau des prix. Ce que nous appelons banking board peut être une alternative à la fois au currency board et à la dollarisation. Sous le banking board, le système bancaire peut émettre des dépôts à vue et des billets à vue convertibles au pair en monnaie de réserve. En plus de la suppression du risque de change et grâce à l’élasticité de l’offre de billets, le système bénéficie de l’atténuation des pressions déflationnistes et d’une stabilisation des réserves des banques. Enfin, une banque supérieure intervenant comme prêteur en dernier ressort peut émerger ou être créée, et sa politique prudentielle est alors à la fois plus lisible et plus efficace.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Société Canadienne de Science Economique in its journal L'Actualité économique.

Volume (Year): 79 (2003)
Issue (Month): 3 (Septembre)
Pages: 367-391

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:79:y:2003:i:3:p:367-391
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:79:y:2003:i:3:p:367-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bruce Shearer)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.