IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rfreco/rfeco_0769-0479_2002_num_17_1_1455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La dollarisation comme solution en dernier ressort

Author

Listed:
  • Henri Bourguinat
  • Larbi Dohni

Abstract

[eng] Ecuador has recently adopted the US dollar as legal tender. Salvador is on the verge of doing so; Guatemala and Costa-Rica are attempting at the same substitution to their own currency. But, the prospect is now more general. In other parts of the world, the dollarization progresses, too; Eastern-Timor and Kosovo have just before replaced their currency, respectively by the dollar and the mark; Balkanic countries are about to dol- larize ("euroize") their economies. Earlier, the South-African rand was substituted to the Lesotho, Swaziland and Namibie national currencies. Now we are far from the previous straight field of official dollarization. A few years ago, it concerned, except the specific case of Panama [1904], only "microscopic" territories like Pacific Island (Guam, Micronesia, etc.) or little cities as, in Europe, Andorra, Lichtenstein, Monaco or the Vatican. Now, official dollarization is quite another phenomenon. It is often presented as a general formula available to reform the International Monetary System (IMS). This solution is now proposed to replace a lot of currencies eroded by inflation, deficits, political crisis, if not by revolts and ethnic troubles. Initially, it seems quite logical to try to replace "minor currencies" by a few number of foreign currencies well identified by the markets and more credible. The main argument of this paper is precisely to discuss this prospect of dollarization used to simplify and rationalize the IMS. Before adopting this view, which seems too optimistic, it would be necessary to consider: - The sound and specific nature of dollarization as a "borrowing contact of credibility in the last resort". —The interest in dollarization, relatively to other exchange rate arrangements like Monetary Unions or Currency Boards. —A cost-benefits analysis of this substitution of a foreign currency to a local one. —An application of the dollarization formula to the Canadian dollar and Eastern Central European countries. [fre] L'Equateur a récemment donné cours légal au dollar. Le Salvador est sur le point de faire de même. Le Guatemala et le Costa-Rica sont également tentés. Mais la perspective est beaucoup plus générale. Dans d'autres parties du monde, la dollarisation progresse (le Timor oriental et le Kosovo ont remplacé leur monnaie par le dollar et le mark) ; les pays balkaniques aussi se « dollarisent » ou « s'euroisent » ; il y a quelques années, le rand sud-africain fut aussi substitué aux monnaies locales de la Namibie, du Lesotho et du Swaziland. Quelques années auparavant, la dollarisation, excepté le cas du Panama [1904], ne concernait que des territoires microscopiques ou de petites cités en Europe, comme les principautés d'Andorre, du Liechtenstein, de Monaco ou le Vatican. Le champ de la dollarisation est donc en train de s'élargir considérablement. La formule est même présentée comme un moyen général de réformer le système monétaire International. Pourquoi, dit-on, ne pas remplacer toute une série de monnaies « mineures » érodées par l'inflation, les déficits, les crises politiques quand ce n'est les révoltes ou troubles ethniques, par un petit nombre de monnaies bien identifiées par les marchés et plus crédibles ? Avant d'adopter cette vue qui paraît trop optimiste (la dollarisation est une solution « en dernier ressort »), il est nécessaire de considérer : —la nature profonde et spécifique de la dollarisation en tant que contrat d'emprunt de crédibilité ; —l'intérêt de la dollarisation par rapport aux autres régimes de change (unions monétaires et caisses d'émission) ; —une analyse coût-bénéfice de la formule ; —une application aux cas du dollar canadien et des pays d'Europe centrale et orientale.

Suggested Citation

  • Henri Bourguinat & Larbi Dohni, 2002. "La dollarisation comme solution en dernier ressort," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 17(1), pages 57-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2002_num_17_1_1455
    Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.2002.1455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/rfeco.2002.1455
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfeco_0769-0479_2002_num_17_1_1455
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francois R. Velde & Marcelo Veracierto, 2000. "Dollarization in Argentina," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, issue Q I, pages 24-37.
    2. Schor, Armand-Denis, 2000. "La théorie des zones monétaires optimales : l’optimum, le praticable, le crédible et le réel," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 76(4), pages 545-576, décembre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alain Raybaut & Dominique Torre, 2004. "Unions monétaires, caisses d'émission et dollarisation : les fondements analytiques des systèmes de change « ultra-fixes »," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 75(2), pages 37-54.
    2. Chrysost Bangake & Jean-Baptiste Desquilbet & Nabil Jedlane, 2006. "Régimes de change pour les petits pays," Post-Print halshs-00225016, HAL.
    3. Le Maux, Laurent, 2003. "Dollarisation officielle : analyse critique et alternative," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 79(3), pages 367-391, Septembre.
    4. Sokic, Alexandre & FABRIS, Nikola, 2013. "Euroization and cyclical stabilization in Montenegro: an empirical analysis," MPRA Paper 46537, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Chrysost Bangake & Jean-Baptiste Desquilbet & Nabil Jedlane, 2006. "Régimes de change pour les petits pays," Post-Print halshs-00225016, HAL.
    6. Chrysost Bangake & Jean-Baptiste Desquilbet & Nabil Jedlane, 2006. "Régimes de change pour les petits pays," Post-Print halshs-00225016, HAL.
    7. Chrysost Bangake & Jean-Baptiste Desquilbet & Nabil Jedlane, 2006. "Régimes de change pour les petits pays," Post-Print halshs-00225016, HAL.
    8. Alexandre Minda, 2005. "La dollarisation intégrale : une option monétaire de dernier ressort pour l'Amérique latine ?," Mondes en développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 130(2), pages 15-39.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2002_num_17_1_1455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/rfeco .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.