IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nbb/ecrart/y2005mseptemberiiiip45-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential growth of the Belgian economy and its determinants

Author

Listed:
  • C. Rigo

    (National Bank of Belgium, Research Department)

Abstract

The potential growth path of the economy is at the centre of various fundamental economic questions, particularly in connection with the conduct of monetary policy and the management of public finances. It also determines the progress of living standards, so that the adverse population prospects confronting the European economies have rekindled interest in the subject. The first chapter of the article reports on the developments recorded over the past twenty years, using a method derived from the one adopted by the EC and based on the use of a production function. The role played by the three determinants – labour, capital and total factor productivity – is discussed, focusing on the case of the Belgian economy while comparing the results with those recorded in the EU-15. With potential growth averaging 2.2 p.c. for the private sector and 2.1 p.c. in the whole economy, Belgium is in the middle group of European countries. A growth breakdown between labour volume and labour productivity is proposed in chapter 2. Belgium’s advantages and disadvantages are assessed, not only in comparison with the EU-15 average but also in relation to the United States. Particular attention is drawn to the divergent picture in terms of productivity on the two continents. The improving performance in the United States in this respect contrasts with the deceleration recorded in Europe. The slowdown was also experienced in Belgium although, in the past ten years, the weaker growth in labour productivity here was due essentially to a slower increase in capital intensity. Having diminished between 1985 and 1995, the growth of total factor productivity, which in principle measures the overall productive capacity of the economy, stabilised at a level above the European average and close to that of the United States. This relatively good performance could be due to the fairly widespread use of ICT, as Belgium’s investment expenditure on this item is greater than that of the majority of European countries. The highly skilled labour force provides additional support for total factor productivity, although its impact has not been quantified in the case of Belgium. Expenditure on research and development could also yield substantial productivity returns. Particular efforts in these three fields, in a context within which market forces provide appropriate incentives to the economic agents, could hold possibilities for enhancing productivity growth. This could contribute to stimulate growth in view of the anticipated adverse demographic developments in the coming decades, that will also require raising the rates of participation in the labour market.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Rigo, 2005. "The potential growth of the Belgian economy and its determinants," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue iii, pages 45-64, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2005:m:september:i:iii:p:45-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nbb.be/en/articles/potential-growth-belgian-economy-and-its-determinants
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Oulton, 2002. "ICT and Productivity Growth in the United Kingdom," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 363-379.
    2. repec:dgr:rugggd:200368 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Cette, G. & Kocoglu, Y. & Mairesse, J., 2004. "L’ effet de la diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) sur la productivité par employé en France," Bulletin de la Banque de France, Banque de France, issue 121, pages 33-46.
    4. repec:dgr:rugggd:200363 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. -, 2005. "United States economic outlook: quarterly developments," Oficina de la CEPAL en Washington (Estudios e Investigaciones) 28847, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Timmer, Marcel P. & Ypma, Gerard & Ark, Bart van der, 2003. "IT in the European Union: driving productivity divergence?," GGDC Research Memorandum 200363, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    7. Ark, Bart van & Inklaar, Robert & McGuckin, Robert, 2002. ""Changing gear" : productivity, ICT and services: Europe and the United States," GGDC Research Memorandum 200260, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    8. -, 2005. "United States economic outlook: quarterly developments," Oficina de la CEPAL en Washington (Estudios e Investigaciones) 28841, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    9. Giuseppe Nicoletti & Stefano Scarpetta, 2003. "Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence [‘A model of growth through creative destruction’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 18(36), pages 9-72.
    10. Cécile Denis & Kieran McMorrow & Werner Röger, 2004. "An analysis of EU and US productivity developments (a total economy and industry level perspective)," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 208, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    11. Ms. Paula De Masi, 1997. "IMF Estimates of Potential Output: Theory and Practice," IMF Working Papers 1997/177, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Vijselaar, Focco & Backé, Peter, 2002. "New technologies and productivity growth in the euro area," Working Paper Series 122, European Central Bank.
    13. Cette, Gilbert & Mairesse, Jacques & Kocoglu, Yusuf, 2005. "ICT diffusion and potential output growth," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 231-234, May.
    14. Bart van Ark & Robert Inklaar & Robert H. McGuckin, 2002. "'Changing Gear' - Productivity, ICT and Services Industries: Europe and the United States," Economics Program Working Papers 02-02, The Conference Board, Economics Program.
    15. Gilbert Cette & Jacques Mairesse & Yusuf Kocoglu, 2002. "The Diffusion of ICTs and Growth of the French Economy over the Long-term, 1980-2000," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 4, pages 27-38, Spring.
    16. Robert Inklaar & Mary O'Mahony & Marcel Timmer, 2005. "ICT AND EUROPE's PRODUCTIVITY PERFORMANCE: INDUSTRY‐LEVEL GROWTH ACCOUNT COMPARISONS WITH THE UNITED STATES," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 51(4), pages 505-536, December.
    17. Chantal Kegels & Mary Van Overbeke & Willem Van Zandweghe, 2002. "Working Paper 08-02 - ICT contribution to economic performance in Belgium: preliminary evidence -revision of WP 7-02," Working Papers 0208, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    18. repec:dgr:rugggd:200260 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Paolo Guarda, 2002. "Potential output and the output gap in Luxembourg: some alternative methods," BCL working papers 4, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    20. -, 2005. "United States economic outlook: quarterly developments," Oficina de la CEPAL en Washington (Estudios e Investigaciones) 28845, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R. Basselier & G. Langenus & P. Reusens, 2017. "The potential growth of the Belgian economy," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue ii, pages 37-53, september.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2012. "The Transatlantic Productivity Gap: A Survey Of The Main Causes," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 395-419, July.
    2. Navarro-García, Juan Carlos & Madrid-Guijarro, Antonia, 2016. "Real economic activity and accounting information in Spanish construction and real estate firms," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 21-30.
    3. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-79 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ark, Bart van, 2002. "ICT investments and growth accounts for the European Union," GGDC Research Memorandum 200256, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    5. Fabiano Schivardi & Eliana Viviano, 2011. "Entry Barriers in Retail Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(551), pages 145-170, March.
    6. repec:dgr:rugggd:200363 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Francesco Venturini, 2005. "How Much Does IT Consumption Matter for Growth? Evidence from National Accounts," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 95(1), pages 57-110, January-F.
    8. repec:dgr:rugggd:200256 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:dgr:rugsom:05c01 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. van Ark, Bart & Inklaar, Robert, 2006. "Catching up or getting stuck? Europe's troubles to exploit ICT's productivity potential," GGDC Research Memorandum GD-79, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    11. Gilbert Cette & Christian Pfister, 2004. "Challenges of the “New Economy” for Monetary Policy," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 8, pages 27-36, Spring.
    12. Markus Poschke, 2010. "The Regulation of Entry and Aggregate Productivity," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 120(549), pages 1175-1200, December.
    13. Erumban, Abdul Azeez & de Jong, Simon B., 2006. "Cross-country differences in ICT adoption: A consequence of Culture?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 302-314, December.
    14. Laura Abramovsky & Rachel Griffith, 2009. "ICT, corporate restructuring and productivity," IFS Working Papers W09/10, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    15. Antonopoulos, Christos & Sakellaris, Plutarchos, 2009. "The contribution of Information and Communication Technology investments to Greek economic growth: An analytical growth accounting framework," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 171-191, August.
    16. Berthold, Norbert & Fricke, Holger, 2009. "Die Bundesländer im Standortwettbewerb," Discussion Paper Series 106, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    17. Berthold, Norbert & Fricke, Holger, 2007. "Volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen der finanziellen Ausgleichsysteme in Deutschland," Discussion Paper Series 93, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    18. Timmer, Marcel P. & Ypma, Gerard & Ark, Bart van der, 2003. "IT in the European Union: driving productivity divergence?," GGDC Research Memorandum 200363, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    19. Broersma, Lourens & Dijk, Jouke van, 2005. "Regional differences in productivity growth in The Netherlands: an industry-level growth accounting," CCSO Working Papers 200504, University of Groningen, CCSO Centre for Economic Research.
    20. repec:cnb:ocpubv:rb03/1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Espinoza, Héctor & Kling, Gerhard & McGroarty, Frank & O'Mahony, Mary & Ziouvelou, Xenia, 2020. "Estimating the impact of the Internet of Things on productivity in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116391, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    22. Gilbert Cette & Yusuf Kocoglu & Jacques Mairesse, 2009. "Productivity Growth and Levels in France, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States in the Twentieth Century," NBER Working Papers 15577, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    23. R. Nahuis & H. van der Wiel, 2005. "How Should Europe’s ICT Ambitions look like? An Interpretative Review of the Facts," Working Papers 05-22, Utrecht School of Economics.
    24. Francesco Venturini, 2009. "The long-run impact of ICT," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 497-515, December.
    25. O'Mahony, Mary & Robinson, Catherine & Vecchi, Michela, 2008. "The impact of ICT on the demand for skilled labour: A cross-country comparison," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 1435-1450, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    potential output; labour productivity; growth accounting; total factor productivity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2005:m:september:i:iii:p:45-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bnbgvbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.