IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mfa/journl/v29y2021i2p29-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Minimum Tick Size Policy on Price Efficiency and Execution Cost

Author

Listed:
  • Syamsul Idul Adha

    (Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Ar-Raniry, Indonesia.)

  • A. Sakir

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Syiah Kuala, Indonesia.)

Abstract

Research Question: Whether the minimum tick size has effect on small caps price efficiency and execution cost on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Motivation: The market microstructure of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) is based on the emerging market-order driven system which is different than developed market and identified by the problem of inefficiency market. The previous related literatures to minimum tick size policy are only limited to the concept of liquidity and the bid-ask spreads (Bessembinder, 1999; Goldstein and Kavajecz, 2000; Ekaputra and Ahmad, 2007). We propose a new empirical model using Market Efficiency Coefficient (MEC) approach as the only proxy of the price efficiency, Price Inefficiency (PINE) to measure the level of price inefficiency level, and Execution Cost (COST) to measure the probability of error pricing in stock trading. This empirical model is applied to the testing of the effectiveness of minimum tick size policy and its impact on stock trading efficiency. Idea: Based on the empirical research literature, the minimum tick size policy will increase the price efficiency and reducing the execution cost for some of the securities transactions, then the execution cost can also be minimalized to create a beneficial transaction. Data: We collect the daily stock price trading, intraday price trading, and trading volume from Regular Board (RG) and RTI data recording. Method/Tools: We run the Ordinary Least Square (OLS), Quintile Regression as robust test, and General Linear Model to test the empirical model. Findings: We find that the minimum tick size insignificantly effects price efficiency and partially affects execution cost. The minimum tick size significantly affects mean of execution cost, but insignificantly affects median of execution cost. We also find that insignificant difference of small caps price efficiency level between pre-implementation of the minimum tick size and post-implementation of the minimum tick size and significant difference of execution cost level between pre-implementation of the minimum tick size and post implementation of the minimum tick size. Contributions: Our research contributes to develop a robust empirical model to analyse the impact of market microstructure policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Syamsul Idul Adha & A. Sakir, 2021. "Effect of Minimum Tick Size Policy on Price Efficiency and Execution Cost," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 29(2), pages 29-41.
    • Handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:29:y:2021:i:2:p:29-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mfa.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/v29_i2_a3_pg29-41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terrance Odean., 1996. "Volume, Volatility, Price and Profit When All Trader Are Above Average," Research Program in Finance Working Papers RPF-266, University of California at Berkeley.
    2. Tarun Chordia & Lakshmanan Shivakumar & Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 2006. "The Cross-Section of Daily Variation in Liquidity," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Ivan E Brick & Tavy Ronen & Cheng-Few Lee (ed.), Advances In Quantitative Analysis Of Finance And Accounting Essays in Microstructure in Honor of David K Whitcomb, chapter 5, pages 75-110, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Grossman, Sanford J & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1980. "On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 393-408, June.
    4. Green, T. Clifton, 2006. "The Value of Client Access to Analyst Recommendations," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Angel, James J, 1997. "Tick Size, Share Prices, and Stock Splits," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 655-681, June.
    6. Kee Chung & Jangkoo Kang & Joon-Seok Kim, 2011. "Tick size, market structure, and market quality," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 57-81, January.
    7. Irwan Adi Ekaputra & Basharat Ahmad, 2007. "The Impact of Tick Size Reduction on Liquidity and Order Strategy : Evidence from the Jakarta Stock Exchange (JSX)," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, vol. 55, pages 89-104, April.
    8. Xin Zhao & Kee H. Chung, 2006. "Decimal Pricing and Information-Based Trading: Tick Size and Informational Efficiency of Asset Price," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5-6), pages 753-766.
    9. Peter Cramton, 1997. "The FCC Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 431-495, September.
    10. Alexander Kurov, 2008. "Tick size reduction, execution costs, and informational efficiency in the regular and E‐mini Nasdaq‐100 index futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(9), pages 871-888, September.
    11. Fama, Eugene F, et al, 1969. "The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Barberis, Nicholas & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert, 1998. "A model of investor sentiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 307-343, September.
    13. Andreas Dische, 2002. "Dispersion in Analyst Forecasts and the Profitability of Earnings Momentum Strategies," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 8(2), pages 211-228, June.
    14. OPREAN Camelia & BRATIAN Vasile, 2012. "Market Informational Efficiency Tests And Its Critics: The Case Of Emergent Capital Markets," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(4), pages 482-491.
    15. Van Ness, Bonnie F & Van Ness, Robert A & Pruitt, Stephen W, 2000. "The Impact of the Reduction in Tick Increments in Major U.S. Markets on Spreads, Depth, and Volatility," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 153-167, September.
    16. Chordia, Tarun & Roll, Richard & Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 2008. "Liquidity and market efficiency," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 249-268, February.
    17. Lehmann, Bruce N., 2002. "Some desiderata for the measurement of price discovery across markets," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 259-276, July.
    18. Chiang, Thomas C & Doong, Shuh-Chyi, 2001. "Empirical Analysis of Stock Returns and Volatility: Evidence from Seven Asian Stock Markets Based on TAR-GARCH Model," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 301-318, November.
    19. OPREAN Camelia & BRATIAN Vasile, 2012. "Financial Market Tests Of Informational Efficiency: The Case Of Emergent Markets," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 65(6), pages 57-82.
    20. Xin Zhao & Kee H. Chung, 2006. "Decimal Pricing and Information‐Based Trading: Tick Size and Informational Efficiency of Asset Price," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5‐6), pages 753-766, June.
    21. Goldstein, Michael A. & A. Kavajecz, Kenneth, 2000. "Eighths, sixteenths, and market depth: changes in tick size and liquidity provision on the NYSE," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 125-149, April.
    22. David C. Porter & Daniel G. Weaver, 1997. "Tick Size and Market Quality," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 26(4), Winter.
    23. Jones, Charles M. & Kaul, Gautam & Lipson, Marc L., 1994. "Information, trading, and volatility," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 127-154, August.
    24. Baillie, Richard T. & Geoffrey Booth, G. & Tse, Yiuman & Zabotina, Tatyana, 2002. "Price discovery and common factor models," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 309-321, July.
    25. Irwan Adi Ekaputra & Erni Sukmadini Asikin, 2012. "Impact of Tick Size Reduction on Small Caps Price Efficiency and Execution cost on the Indonesia Stock Exchange," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 8(Supp. 1), pages 1-12.
    26. Bessembinder, Hendrik, 1999. "Trade Execution Costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE: A Post-Reform Comparison," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 387-407, September.
    27. Terrance Odean, 1998. "Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 53(6), pages 1887-1934, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albuquerque, Rui & Song, Shiyun & Yao, Chen, 2017. "The Price Effects of Liquidity Shocks: A Study of SEC’s Tick-Size Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 12486, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Thanos Verousis & Pietro Perotti & Georgios Sermpinis, 2018. "One size fits all? High frequency trading, tick size changes and the implications for exchanges: market quality and market structure considerations," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 353-392, February.
    3. Albuquerque, Rui & Song, Shiyun & Yao, Chen, 2020. "The price effects of liquidity shocks: A study of the SEC’s tick size experiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 700-724.
    4. AltInkIlIç, Oya & Hansen, Robert S., 2009. "On the information role of stock recommendation revisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 17-36, October.
    5. Peng, Lin & Xiong, Wei, 2006. "Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 563-602, June.
    6. Jiao, Peiran & Veiga, André & Walther, Ansgar, 2020. "Social media, news media and the stock market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 63-90.
    7. Winter, Christoph, 2018. "The Impact of Heterogeneous Signals on Stock Price Predictability in a Rational Expectations Model," Working papers 2018/21, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    8. Tarek A. Hassan & Thomas M. Mertens, 2017. "The Social Cost of Near-Rational Investment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(4), pages 1059-1103, April.
    9. Murphy Jun Jie Lee, 2013. "The Microstructure of Trading Processes on the Singapore Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 2-2013.
    10. Liu, Hongqi & Peng, Cameron & Xiong, Wei A. & Xiong, Wei, 2022. "Taming the bias zoo," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 716-741.
    11. Michael Fleming & Giang Nguyen & Francisco Ruela, 2024. "Tick Size, Competition for Liquidity Provision, and Price Discovery: Evidence from the U.S. Treasury Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 332-354, January.
    12. Vuorenmaa, Tommi A., 2008. "Decimalization, Realized Volatility, and Market Microstructure Noise," MPRA Paper 8692, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Khalil Dayri & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2012. "Large tick assets: implicit spread and optimal tick size," Papers 1207.6325, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2013.
    14. Liu, Hongqi & Peng, Cameron & Wei, Xiong & Wei, Xiong, 2022. "Taming the bias zoo," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109301, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Mohrschladt, Hannes & Langer, Thomas, 2020. "Biased information weight processing in stock markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 89-106.
    16. Stéphane Goutte & David Guerreiro & Bilel Sanhaji & Sophie Saglio & Julien Chevallier, 2019. "International Financial Markets," Post-Print halshs-02183053, HAL.
    17. Wei Xiong, 2013. "Bubbles, Crises, and Heterogeneous Beliefs," NBER Working Papers 18905, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Komáromi, György, 2002. "A hatékony piacok elméletének elméleti és gyakorlati relevanciája [The theoretical and practical relevance of the theory of efficient markets]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 377-395.
    19. Irwan Adi Ekaputra & Erni Sukmadini Asikin, 2012. "Impact of Tick Size Reduction on Small Caps Price Efficiency and Execution cost on the Indonesia Stock Exchange," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 8(Supp. 1), pages 1-12.
    20. Murphy Jun Jie Lee, 2013. "The Microstructure of Trading Processes on the Singapore Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 4, July-Dece.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Minimum tick size; price efficiency; price inefficiency; execution cost; IDX;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G19 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:29:y:2021:i:2:p:29-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Capital Market Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.