IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v201y2025i4d10.1007_s10551-025-05964-4.html

Three Dilemmas of Disabled Employee Voice

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Starzyk

    (NEOMA Business School)

  • Jana F. Bauer

    (University of Cologne)

Abstract

We conceptualize the phenomenon of disabled employee voice to make a case for how disabled employees are systematically prevented from speaking out. Most research on employee voice supposes that the decision for and process of speaking out is similar across employees. We expose that the often inherent (dis-)ableism in organizations imposes three voice dilemmas on disabled employees, adding an additional layer of obstructions to their voice. The first dilemma around disabled employees’ voicer identity evolves because disabled employees systematically have less power and a lower status due to ableist hierarchies in organizations. The second dilemma around voice design arises because disabled employees systematically lack access to suitable voice opportunities because voice structures, procedures, and processes disregard their (dis-)abilities, needs, and preferences. The third dilemma around voice purpose emerges because disabled employees may want and need to advocate for disability rights and, in turn, promote voice content that does not align with their organizations’ interests. Consequently, disabled employee voice provides a better understanding of their disadvantageous voice experiences and points to the laborious practices disabled employees need to engage in to speak out. In addition, we discuss how organizational leaders and policymakers can become responsible for combating the lack of disabled employees’ voices in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Starzyk & Jana F. Bauer, 2025. "Three Dilemmas of Disabled Employee Voice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(4), pages 941-967, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:201:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-025-05964-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-025-05964-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-025-05964-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-025-05964-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eline Jammaers, 2023. "Theorizing Discursive Resistance to Organizational Ethics of Care Through a Multi-stakeholder Perspective on Disability Inclusion Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 333-345, March.
    2. Jane E. Dutton & Susan J. Ashford & Regina M. O’ Neill & Erika Hayes & Elizabeth E. Wierba, 1997. "Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 407-423, May.
    3. Carol Woodhams & Susan Corby, 2007. "Then and Now: Disability Legislation and Employers' Practices in the UK," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 45(3), pages 556-580, September.
    4. Kristian Alm & David S. A. Guttormsen, 2023. "Enabling the Voices of Marginalized Groups of People in Theoretical Business Ethics Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 303-320, January.
    5. Bell, Myrtle P. & Özbilgin, Mustafa F. & Beauregard, T. Alexandra & Sürgevil, Olca, 2011. "Voice, silence, and diversity in 21st century organizations: strategies for inclusion of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 32094, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Jane E. Dutton & Susan J. Ashford & Katherine A. Lawrence & Kathi Miner-Rubino, 2002. "Red Light, Green Light: Making Sense of the Organizational Context for Issue Selling," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 355-369, August.
    7. Lisa Reber & Jodi M. Kreschmer & Tyler G. James & Jaime D. Junior & Gina L. DeShong & Shan Parker & Michelle A. Meade, 2022. "Ableism and Contours of the Attitudinal Environment as Identified by Adults with Long-Term Physical Disabilities: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    8. James R. Detert & Linda K. Treviño, 2010. "Speaking Up to Higher-Ups: How Supervisors and Skip-Level Leaders Influence Employee Voice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 249-270, February.
    9. Gregor Wolbring, 2008. "The Politics of Ableism," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 51(2), pages 252-258, June.
    10. Santuzzi, Alecia M. & Waltz, Pamela R. & Finkelstein, Lisa M. & Rupp, Deborah E., 2014. "Invisible Disabilities: Unique Challenges for Employees and Organizations," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 204-219, June.
    11. Ethan R. Burris & James R. Detert & Alexander C. Romney, 2013. "Speaking Up vs. Being Heard: The Disagreement Around and Outcomes of Employee Voice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 22-38, February.
    12. Carolijn TERWINDT & Amy ARMSTRONG, 2019. "Oversight and accountability in the social auditing industry: The role of social compliance initiatives," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(2), pages 245-272, June.
    13. Sara Louise Muhr, 2008. "Othering diversity – a Levinasian analysis of diversity management," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 176-189.
    14. Michael Barry & Adrian Wilkinson, 2016. "Pro-Social or Pro-Management? A Critique of the Conception of Employee Voice as a Pro-Social Behaviour within Organizational Behaviour," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 261-284, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oana Branzei & Anica Zeyen & Susanne M. Bruyère & Eline Jammaers & Nidhi Singal & Gregor Wolbring, 2025. "Ethical Dilemmas of Disability Inclusion—Emerging Ethics of Activism and Care: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(4), pages 781-795, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iñigo Gallo & Domènec Melé, 2025. "Work Integration of People with Mental Disorders Through Social Enterprise: A Humanistic-Personalist Framework and Case Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 199(4), pages 693-713, July.
    2. James R. Detert & Linda K. Treviño, 2010. "Speaking Up to Higher-Ups: How Supervisors and Skip-Level Leaders Influence Employee Voice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 249-270, February.
    3. Gorgijevski, Alexander & Holmström Lind, Christine & Lagerström, Katarina, 2019. "Does proactivity matter? the importance of initiative selling tactics for headquarters acceptance of subsidiary initiatives," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(4).
    4. Deepti Sharma & Ganesh N. Prabhu, 2025. "Navigating Competency in an Ableist World: The Lived Experiences of Disabled Individuals in Education and the Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(4), pages 859-893, November.
    5. Daniel Qi Chen & Yanlin Zhang & Jinghua Xiao & Kang Xie, 2021. "Making Digital Innovation Happen: A Chief Information Officer Issue Selling Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 987-1008, September.
    6. Anna Paolillo & Jorge Sinval & Sílvia A. Silva & Vittorio E. Scuderi, 2021. "The Relationship between Inclusion Climate and Voice Behaviors beyond Social Exchange Obligation: The Role of Psychological Needs Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. van den Oever, Koen, 2017. "Uncharted waters : A behavioral approach to when, why and which organizational changes are adopted," Other publications TiSEM 0136c8c2-ecdd-4f82-8ca7-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville, 2007. "Developing Issue-Selling Effectiveness over Time: Issue Selling as Resourcing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 560-577, August.
    9. Michiel de Roo & Christopher Wickert & Frank G. A. de Bakker & Tom Elfring, 2025. "From seller to broker : When and how issue sellers engage with external stakeholders to sell issues inside organizations," Post-Print hal-04792325, HAL.
    10. Claire Doussard & Emmanuelle Garbe & Jeremy Morales & Julien Billion, 2024. "Universal Design for the Workplace: Ethical Considerations Regarding the Inclusion of Workers with Disabilities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(2), pages 285-296, October.
    11. Zhiyu Feng & Fong Keng-Highberger & Kai Chi Yam & Xiao-Ping Chen & Hu Li, 2023. "Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: How and When Machiavellian Leaders Demonstrate Strategic Abuse," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 255-280, April.
    12. Conroy, Kieran M. & Collings, David G., 2016. "The legitimacy of subsidiary issue selling: Balancing positive & negative attention from corporate headquarters," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 612-627.
    13. Sarah Richard & Sophie Hennekam, 2020. "When Can a Disability Quota System Empower Disabled Individuals in the Workplace? The Case of France," Post-Print hal-03232751, HAL.
    14. Tomi Laamanen, 2019. "Dynamic attention-based view of corporate headquarters in MNCs," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Maynes, Timothy D. & Podsakoff, Philip M. & Podsakoff, Nathan P. & Yoo, Amber N., 2024. "Harnessing the power of employee voice for individual and organizational effectiveness," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 283-298.
    16. Eline Jammaers, 2023. "Theorizing Discursive Resistance to Organizational Ethics of Care Through a Multi-stakeholder Perspective on Disability Inclusion Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 333-345, March.
    17. Raj, Medha & Wiltermuth, Scott S., 2022. "Better now than later: The social cost of victims’ delayed accusations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Weiner, Bryan Jeffrey & Hobgood, Cherri & Lewis, Megan A., 2008. "The meaning of justice in safety incident reporting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 403-413, January.
    19. Carlos Martin-Rios, 2016. "Innovative management control systems in knowledge work: a middle manager perspective," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 181-204, May.
    20. Florian M. Artinger & Sabrina Artinger & Gerd Gigerenzer, 2019. "C. Y. A.: frequency and causes of defensive decisions in public administration," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 9-25, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:201:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-025-05964-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.